Accrington Web - White Wash at Westminster

Page 5 of 5

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

Accrington Web (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/index.php)

- General Chat (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f69/)

- - White Wash at Westminster (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f69/white-wash-at-westminster-47912.html)

jaysay

05-02-2010 11:24

Re: White Wash at Westminster

Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 785207)

Most Americans though that Eye-rack was a well upholstered chest, where you could comfortably rest your gaze.

:rolleyes::D

Think that went out the window with the statement I did not have sexual relations with that woman:D

Mancie

05-02-2010 17:06

Re: White Wash at Westminster

Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 721989)

Well Gordon has decide to have a public enquiry about the Gulf War, the only thing is it ain't public, its to be held totally in camera, so that anything controversial won't come out, even them the report won't come out until after the General Election. So much for open and honest Government, the first chance he has and he bottles it. There is no doubt that some parts should me kept in secret, to protect national security, but just what went on in the run up to the war should be open and honest, pigs are flying over Ossy as I write:(

to get back to the original post, it is a "Public Inquiry".. unlike the Falklands ..the first Gulf War.. or the "Arms to Iraq" inquires. ;)

Eric	05-02-2010 18:37

Re: White Wash at Westminster

Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 785163)

Unfortunately their commander in chief couldn't some one had to point it out, or he'd have attacked Iran:D

Or the Isle of Man:rolleyes:

jaysay

06-02-2010 07:57

Re: White Wash at Westminster

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mancie (Post 785278)

to get back to the original post, it is a "Public Inquiry".. unlike the Falklands ..the first Gulf War.. or the "Arms to Iraq" inquires. ;)

Why should there have been a public inquiry into those three didn't realise anybody lied to sort it out, unlike Blair who lied through his teeth about WMDs

Bernard Dawson

06-02-2010 09:16

Re: White Wash at Westminster

Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 785404)

Why should there have been a public inquiry into those three didn't realise anybody lied to sort it out, unlike Blair who lied through his teeth about WMDs

At the time you will probably recall that most people thought that Iraq had WMB, including the Tory Party.

jaysay

06-02-2010 09:54

Re: White Wash at Westminster

Only because your lying scumbag Blair Lied, had massaged the facts aided and abetted by Campbell

Neil	06-02-2010 09:54

Re: White Wash at Westminster

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bernard Dawson (Post 785423)

At the time you will probably recall that most people thought that Iraq had WMB, including the Tory Party.

Yes that is true.
The issue is why did we?
we deceived?
If so who by?
Was it on purpose or genuinely poor intelligence?

jaysay

06-02-2010 10:05

Re: White Wash at Westminster

Quote:

Originally Posted by Neil (Post 785434)

Yes that is true.
The issue is why did we?
we deceived?
If so who by?
Was it on purpose or genuinely poor intelligence?

To pander to George W Neil:( Yaw Blair:rolleyes:

webglynne

06-02-2010 11:18

Re: White Wash at Westminster

(At the time you will probably recall that most people thought that Iraq had WMB, including the Tory Party.)

The man on the front line Hans Blik? didn't! And since when did the tory party have an intelligence service?

kestrelx

06-02-2010 12:29

Re: White Wash at Westminster

Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 785433)

Only because your lying scumbag Blair Lied, had massaged the facts aided and abetted by Campbell

Yep Blair is a Liar - he told us that Saddam could reach this country with weapons of mass destruction in 45 mins! Liar! He still claims he believes it! but that is because he is a consumate liar! All politicians get where they are by deciet and lies. How can we ever have a fair society when it's run by these kind of people who's profession is based on one-up man ship and deciet! Anyone read, Machiavelli the Prince?

Aftert the next election a Tory leader will be as bad if not worse than Brown/Labour! People are aware of this and it leads to voter apathy which perpetuates this evil system! When will there be a revolution?

jaysay

06-02-2010 14:08

Re: White Wash at Westminster

The thing is there has never been a successful Labour Government in history, they always leave a tip behind them, then we get the likes of Mancie moaning because the incoming Tories have to take stringent measures to put Labours mistakes right, it was bad enough righting the country after 5 years in the seventies, god knows what it will take after 13 years and a trillion pounds of debt

garinda

06-02-2010 17:32

Re: White Wash at Westminster

The enquiry may have failed, but good old Fern managed to illicit the confession that Blair would have gone to war in Iraq regardless, despite there not being weapons of mass destruction.

An illegal war, that if the truth had been known, wouldn't have been supported by his party, and parliament.

YouTube - Tony Blair Admits He Would Have Invaded Iraq Anyway

Stumped

06-02-2010 19:19

Re: White Wash at Westminster

Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 785483)

It matters not a jot who gets into power next time around. We have been sold down the river by past Labour and Tory administrations which has transformed the UK into a dumping ground for the world's unwanted riff raff, with thanks to France, Germany and the Netherlands in particular for facilitating the flow. The UK is all but dead in the water and - short of a miracle - I cannot see it recovering within the next couple of generations. If ever?

All times are GMT. The time now is 04:02.

Page 5 of 5

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page