![]() |
cameras on traffic lights
i never thought i would ever say this but its about time we got cameras on traffic lights to catch red light shooters especially at dill hall lane where express gifts is and on blackburn road near where afrikas/dolly greys used to be
teh speed these morons are shooting through long after the light has gone red is getting beyond a joke and at the dill hall lane lights at 5pm you can get between 4 to 8 cars still nipping through long after tehir light has gone red causing those with teh green light to sometimes have to wait as their light goes back to red leavingthem stranded in no mans land, it also causes problems for those waiting to turn right in teh yellow box because they cant get out due to a constant stream of cars shooting through on red ok moan over but they could make thousands putting camera units on teh lights and in my opinion shooting a red light is a lot more dangerous than speeding |
Re: cameras on traffic lights
Red-light cameras exist. They are in mainstream use across
Manchester. They work very much in the same way as speed cameras. Just not reached us yet.. :( Perhaps worth a query with the LCC and suggestions for certain lights. |
Re: cameras on traffic lights
More costs on the county rate levy:rolleyes:
......as if we weren't being watched enough ......why don't they design a camera to be worn on the forehead of everyone venturing outside their home. Oooops - I have to be careful what I wish for:D |
Re: cameras on traffic lights
Quote:
|
Re: cameras on traffic lights
Quote:
|
Re: cameras on traffic lights
Quote:
i tought a paranoid nut like you would be up to speed on what sort of cameras do what lol :D |
Re: cameras on traffic lights
I did e-mail the L.C.C. expressing our concerns on the issue of red light jumping and asking if they had any plans to install these cameras around Hyndburn ... this is the reply :-
'Kate During the 1990's, Lancashire County Council purchased a red light camera and identified 6 locations for the installation of housings in which to deploy the camera. The locations were generally in the Preston area and sites selected following detailed analysis of collision records at traffic signals. The direction that the camera faced was determined by the direction that the majority of red light violation collisions had occurred at each junction. The 6 sites have been continually monitored and a report produced in June 2005 showed that on average across the 6 locations, injury collisions had fallen by 10.6% from 21.6 to 19.3 per year. Further analysis is now being carried out looking at the occurrence of injury collisions at traffic signals over the three year period from 2006 to 2008 inclusive. After that the Partnership will be reviewing its strategy towards red light cameras but to date no firm decisions have been made I hope the above is of some assistance Steve Whitehouse Project Manager Lancashire Partnership for Road Safety Guild House Cross Street Preston PR1 8RD Tel 01772 532411 Mob 0781 553 1567 Fax: 01772 531365 Get all the latest news at www.safe2travel.co.uk ' Slow progress, but at least they are monitoring the budget on these to see whether will be effective. Funnily enough, did notice that there was one of those yellow triangle warning signs on the 30 mph poles today warning you of a CCTV camera at the Dill Hall traffic lights which I had never noticed before ... thought blimey, that's service for ya' ... :D |
Re: cameras on traffic lights
The CCTV sign has been there for ages.
What I find wrong is that they only target accident black spots. In other words they wait until someone is killed then think they better look like they care after the fact. They need to be more proactive and monitor traffic and add red light cameras where red light jumping is a problem and speed cameras where speeding is a problem before someone is killed. Ordinary CCTV could be used to manually monitor some traffic lights and issue fines and then make a big thing about it in the paper to act as a deterrent to others. |
Re: cameras on traffic lights
Have consulted... :D
'Not 100% sure what the question is... However - the transport authority can only respond to issues as they are presented. The number of red-light violations are actually relatively low - they are mostly self enforcing because you have moving traffic coming across your direction of travel. To suggest that CCTV should be used to monitor driver behaviour at junctions is not a ridiculous idea and they do this in London (to fine yellow box violators, banned turn violators etc). There is a significant cost attached to this and the revenue generated (from fines) would have to be used to finance the infrastructure, equipment and manpower required to monitor these junctions. As incidences of red-light jumping are relatively low, it is unlikely that the revenue generated would be adequate to finance such an undertaking. In any case it would require a huge amount of manpower to monitor every red-light junction in Lancashire! The police are required to record certain information about incidents in their police authority. This is then passed to the transport authority who use the data to establish the reasons for incidents. It is right that they respond, based on the available data, with action to eliminate red-light jumping where it is seen to be causing incidents. People need to bear a certain amount of responsibility for their own behaviour. The alternative would be police officer marshalling every junction, speed humps on every road, pedestrian crossings every 20 metres etc, etc, etc. That might sound a little flippant but the transport authority can only make decisions based on available evidence and does not have the resources to be so 'pro-active' that they monitor every junction in Lancashire. It would appear that the cameras have not been that successful in reducing red-light jumping anyway - a 10% reduction is not great and how does that correlate with incident rates? Overall figures suggest that there are only (based on figures below) 19 incidents per year - I bet if you compared that with speeding there would be a massive difference in these figures! Hope this helps.' |
Re: cameras on traffic lights
Quote:
those cameras are monitored 24 hours a day so somone is already been paid to monitor them and just like any offence the person monitoring them can zoom in , playback and report the crime to a police unit who will basically go round to the registered keepers address later on if no police unit is available to respond as it is all recorded i know this because a friend of mine works for the police and has on many occasions sent police to peoples houses who thought they had got away with driving like a knob and besides no one so far has suggested all traffic lights be monitored but only selected problem ones lol i quoted katex but i am saying teh person who told her that sorry tale was full of crap not katex herself :D |
Re: cameras on traffic lights
CCTV cameras provide jobs for paraplegics so I do find some tolerable:rolleyes: ;)
...and all those who are about to be moved from IB to JSA that can't do physical work |
Re: cameras on traffic lights
I agree cameras at dill hall would be a good idea.
LCC wont make enough Revenue from the camera's, that the crunch here, not safty. |
Re: cameras on traffic lights
in huddersfield not many people rush through on amber since cars started getting flashed as soon as teh light goes red you get flashed so it isnt worth teh risk
LCC's response on teh phone was that they tried them in preston and found that people were slamming on to avoid getting flashed by teh camera resulting in them getting hit from behind by the car behind 2 thoughts here 1: if teh offender was getting flashed for going through on red what on earth was teh car behind him doing going through as well to be in a position where they could rear end teh car infront 2: its up to teh driver behind to allow enough space to stop and avoid a collision should the car infront suddenly brake so its their own tough luck |
All times are GMT. The time now is 14:55. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com