Accrington Web

Accrington Web (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/index.php)
-   General Chat (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f69/)
-   -   UFOS over Preston (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f69/ufos-over-preston-49953.html)

MargaretR 15-10-2009 23:43

UFOS over Preston
 
'1000ft-long UFOs were NOT Chinese lanterns!' - Lancashire Evening Post

Because I started this NEWS thread you wont believe it will you:rolleyes:
I saw it first on a yankee site - a hot topic over there:D

MargaretR 15-10-2009 23:56

Re: UFOS over Preston
 
More people saw them
http://www.uk-ufo.co.uk/2009/10/bamb...-october-2009/
and

Preston North End FC forum from footymad.net

why do I have to get this info from yanks?

MargaretR 16-10-2009 00:06

Re: UFOS over Preston
 
What does it take to convince you lot?
....little green men running down from the Coppice?:D

MargaretR 16-10-2009 00:21

Re: UFOS over Preston
 
I just counted 16 'guests' reading this - members are more concerned with the fate of Accrington Stanley - typical:rolleyes:

steeljack 16-10-2009 00:41

Re: UFOS over Preston
 
just hope they speak English when they open the doors ;)

Eric 16-10-2009 01:27

Re: UFOS over Preston
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by steeljack (Post 753975)
just hope they speak English when they open the doors ;)

They speak English in Preston:eek: Maybe they came for the pies.:D

I do believe that there is life in the Universe, other than us (thank god) ... in fact, I think I believe that the Universe is alive, or is life .... but I can't believe that "they" are given to the kind of travel and the kind of "visiting" that many would have us believe .... popular theories of "aliens" and "UFOs" are just too simplistic, merely Hollywood archetypes (if "archetypes" can be that recent or modern). UFOs are most likely an accidental creation of American movie "culture" ... and are about as real as American fast food is nutritious. Still, I like reading about them ... and I love science fiction (Asimov's 1950s Foundation trilogy is one of my favourite reads) ... but, it's fiction, about as "real" as reality shows.

steeljack 16-10-2009 01:36

Re: UFOS over Preston
 
some of us in California believe we already have a colony of Aliens amongst us , they live inside Mt. Shasta .....one of the most beautiful spots on earth

Mysterious Mt. Shasta

shillelagh 16-10-2009 02:40

Re: UFOS over Preston
 
you'll have to ask david1 and mummiboo if they saw anything ...

the only thing i saw tonight was a couple of army helicopters flying overhead ...

Benipete 16-10-2009 02:55

Re: UFOS over Preston
 
No need to panic,It was only Prestons weekly delivery of pink elephants.:hehetable:end:

Restless 16-10-2009 07:00

Re: UFOS over Preston
 
well according to star trek etc.. all the universe speaks english :p

Quote:

Originally Posted by steeljack (Post 753975)
just hope they speak English when they open the doors


if they did land in preston. preston football hooligans would probally go to the ufo site to greet with baseball bats and other assorted weaponary

Let them land....they maybe here to pick me up - Bill Hicks :D

Wynonie Harris 16-10-2009 07:16

Re: UFOS over Preston
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MargaretR (Post 753974)
I just counted 16 'guests' reading this - members are more concerned with the fate of Accrington Stanley - typical:rolleyes:

Obviously...because it's far more important than a mere trifle like the discovery of intelligent life elsewhere in the universe.

Boeing Guy 16-10-2009 07:31

Re: UFOS over Preston
 
UFO's and Aliens might exist, however Margaret, a man in the LEP and some UFO Sighting forum, is pretty hard to believe.

I do think that we are not alone in the universe. But how do others know we are here?
Search for Extra-Terrestrial Intelligence (SETI), SETI Institute - SETI Institute Homepage, have sent a signal into space, but it will take 21,000 light years to reach it's target, and thats on the edge of the Milky Way, our Galaxy. Which is only one of Millions of Galaxy's in the observable universe.

Radio Waves travel at light speed which is 5,878,630,000,000 Miles (Approx) per year.

So we have some deep space probes, Pioneer 10 is the furthest traveled probe, launched in 1973 and is on a trajectory to leave the solar system.

So assuming that alien intelligence had the ability to travel many light years at once, the universe is estimated at least 93 billion light years across, we could have visitors. But as I said how do they know how to find us?

One last point, if there are superior beings out there, looking at us, they could have made contact, if nt why not. If the technology exists to travel interstellar distances, then they would have no problem in solving our language and even could disarm our weapons making it almost impossible for us to hurt them, when they visit us.

So as I said, very unlikely.:cool:

jaysay 16-10-2009 08:57

Re: UFOS over Preston
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MargaretR (Post 753973)
What does it take to convince you lot?
....little green men running down from the Coppice?:D

You maybe surprised Margaret, but on this subject I don't need convincing, I have long been of the opinion that we are not alone. When I lived in Rossendale I regularly went out at night with my mate and took up residence on the moors overlooking the Valley. When I was first told about the possible settings I was very sceptical to say the least, it wasn't until I experience my first sitting that I started to think maybe there is something out there, I lost count of the number of times we saw unexplainable lights of different shapes and sizes moving at great speeds through the night sky

Mick 16-10-2009 09:07

Re: UFOS over Preston
 
And its got nothing to do with BAe systems having a factory at Warton and another at Samlesbury:rolleyes:

MargaretR 16-10-2009 09:25

Re: UFOS over Preston
 
Boeing Guy - your approach is scientific but limited by known science.
Just expand your mind to the following possibilities
...language is uneccessary when you converse via telepathy which uses exchange of images
...long distances are not a problem when you can bend space/time to suit, and can move between dimensions 3 and 4 (so be invisible to us stuck in 3)
...even longer distances are not a problem when you have bases on planets in our solar system.

MargaretR 16-10-2009 09:31

Re: UFOS over Preston
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by steeljack (Post 753977)
some of us in California believe we already have a colony of Aliens amongst us , they live inside Mt. Shasta .....one of the most beautiful spots on earth

Mysterious Mt. Shasta

I have read about them - they were here before we were - remnant of an ancient civilisation that has been erased from our historical teachings

andrewb 16-10-2009 09:32

Re: UFOS over Preston
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MargaretR (Post 754014)
Boeing Guy - your approach is scientific but limited by known science.

Yours is limitless by imagination.. great!:rolleyes:

MargaretR 16-10-2009 09:36

Re: UFOS over Preston
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by andrewb (Post 754019)
Yours is limitless by imagination.. great!:rolleyes:

If men always had your way of thinking we might never have invented the wheel -
imagination = creativity = invention

Boeing Guy 16-10-2009 09:39

Re: UFOS over Preston
 
Okay I tend to believe in Science Fact rather than Science Fiction, just as Cold Fusion is currently Science Fiction it does not mean it will never be possible.

So if I wanted to travel interstellar distances, why bother with hum drum warp drives, just get a spaceship with Infinite Improbability Drive.
Who needs telepathy when you have a Babel fish.
Maybe I am being a bit humorous here, but I am a big fan of Douglas Adams.
Technology in The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

If interstellar space travel was available, I would sign up for it. I am facinated by space, but the facts do speak for themselves.:D
Sorry

MargaretR 16-10-2009 09:45

Re: UFOS over Preston
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Boeing Guy (Post 754023)

If interstellar space travel was available, I would sign up for it. I am facinated by space, but the facts do speak for themselves.:D
Sorry

If you haven't been enlisted in the 2nd NASA shadow black op by now - youv'e missed the boat - sorry.:D
The 'facts that speak' are limited to the ones that have been revealed

andrewb 16-10-2009 09:47

Re: UFOS over Preston
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MargaretR (Post 754022)
If men always had your way of thinking we might never have invented the wheel -
imagination = creativity = invention


No, my way of thinking is scientific. Science invents things using amounts of imagination that are limited by reality. Not limitless theories backed by no substantial fact. I'm not necessarily commenting on UFO's here, simply a direct response to your post. As far as other life forms go I'm open to the possibility of other existence somewhere in the universe on the basis of probability - certainly not that they're already here.

MargaretR 16-10-2009 09:53

Re: UFOS over Preston
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by andrewb (Post 754026)
No, my way of thinking is scientific. Science invents things using amounts of imagination that are limited by reality. Not limitless theories backed by no substantial fact. I'm not necessarily commenting on UFO's here, simply a direct response to your post. As far as other life forms go I'm open to the possibility of other existence somewhere in the universe on the basis of probability - certainly not that they're already here.

The way of thinking scientifically in terms of visible matter is soon to be 'old hat'. We have been limited by what we can 'see'(your reality) - there is much more.
New developments/discoveries by quantum physicists show that all visible matter is vibrating energy and 'dark matter' has content.

Less 16-10-2009 09:56

Re: UFOS over Preston
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MargaretR (Post 754022)
If men always had your way of thinking we might never have invented the wheel -
imagination = creativity = invention

The wheel wasn't a great invention, what use would one wheel be?

Surely the hole in the middle and a shaft to hold two wheels were better inventions?
http://www.tiptopglobe.com/skin/smile/s10430.gif

andrewb 16-10-2009 09:56

Re: UFOS over Preston
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MargaretR (Post 754029)
The way of thinking scientifically in terms of visible matter is soon to be 'old hat'. We have been limited by what we can 'see'(your reality) - there is much more.
New developments/discoveries by quantum physicists show that all visible matter is vibrating energy and 'dark matter' has content.

We've known about dark matter for some time. I don't see how this makes any difference to my post.

jaysay 16-10-2009 09:59

Re: UFOS over Preston
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Less (Post 754031)
The wheel wasn't a great invention, what use would one wheel be?

Surely the hole in the middle and a shaft to hold two wheels were better inventions?
http://www.tiptopglobe.com/skin/smile/s10430.gif

now I know were the saying beam me up Scottie came from Less:D

MargaretR 16-10-2009 10:01

Re: UFOS over Preston
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by andrewb (Post 754032)
We've known about dark matter for some time. I don't see how this makes any difference to my post.

The reason it was named 'dark' is because they didn't know what is is - now they do:)

MargaretR 16-10-2009 10:18

Re: UFOS over Preston
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Less (Post 754031)
The wheel wasn't a great invention, what use would one wheel be?

Try saying that to a wheelbarrow salesman:D

Less 16-10-2009 10:25

Re: UFOS over Preston
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MargaretR (Post 754041)
Try saying that to a wheelbarrow salesman:D

There you go Maggie showing the exception that proves the rule!

Quote:

imagination = creativity = invention
Even the humble wheelbarrow would be of no use at all if someone hadn't invented the hole & the shaft.

:D

MargaretR 16-10-2009 10:28

Re: UFOS over Preston
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Less (Post 754044)
There you go Maggie showing the exception that proves the rule!



Even the humble wheelbarrow would be of no use at all if someone hadn't invented the hole & the shaft.

:D

Who invented the hole?:confused:

Less 16-10-2009 10:33

Re: UFOS over Preston
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MargaretR (Post 754045)
Who invented the hole?:confused:

Someone with enough imagination and practical sense to realise that a wheel without one is of no use at all.

;)

MargaretR 16-10-2009 10:38

Re: UFOS over Preston
 
..and this is where I get a little surreal

If you can alter the level of the vibration of the physical matter that you are made of, you don't need any physical device to move around.

so wheelbarrows will be obsolete:D

Boeing Guy 16-10-2009 11:34

Re: UFOS over Preston
 
I always thought it was Rowntrees that invented the hole, as in Polo, the mint with the hole.
Polo (sweet) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

***Mr D*** 16-10-2009 12:31

Re: UFOS over Preston
 
Waits for tealeaf to call ALL the believers "Fruitcakes":rolleyes::D:D

MargaretR 16-10-2009 12:43

Re: UFOS over Preston
 
It is events like this that make Disclosure unavoidable
The Disclosure Project - Home Page

Bernard Dawson 16-10-2009 13:00

Re: UFOS over Preston
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 754007)
You maybe surprised Margaret, but on this subject I don't need convincing, I have long been of the opinion that we are not alone. When I lived in Rossendale I regularly went out at night with my mate and took up residence on the moors overlooking the Valley. When I was first told about the possible settings I was very sceptical to say the least, it wasn't until I experience my first sitting that I started to think maybe there is something out there, I lost count of the number of times we saw unexplainable lights of different shapes and sizes moving at great speeds through the night sky

I was a bit sceptical about extra terrestrials travelling across the universe to get to Preston. But now you are telling me that they do the same to get to Rossendale.

You really are taking the what's it now.

Gayle 16-10-2009 13:05

Re: UFOS over Preston
 
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 754007)
You maybe surprised Margaret, but on this subject I don't need convincing, I have long been of the opinion that we are not alone. When I lived in Rossendale I regularly went out at night with my mate and took up residence on the moors overlooking the Valley. When I was first told about the possible settings I was very sceptical to say the least, it wasn't until I experience my first sitting that I started to think maybe there is something out there, I lost count of the number of times we saw unexplainable lights of different shapes and sizes moving at great speeds through the night sky

Was this what you saw in Rossendale?

MargaretR 16-10-2009 13:07

Re: UFOS over Preston
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gayle (Post 754128)
Was this what you saw in Rossendale?

Have you had therapy to cure you of aversion to the P word?

Gayle 16-10-2009 13:09

Re: UFOS over Preston
 
I've never had an aversion to it, I'm very proud of them - just had an aversion to people attacking them. :D

Bernard Dawson 16-10-2009 13:23

Re: UFOS over Preston
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gayle (Post 754131)
I've never had an aversion to it, I'm very proud of them - just had an aversion to people attacking them. :D

The one in Rossendale Gayle as been very successful. I'm sure it would have worked here as well.

I suppose better not regurgitate that argument. Maybe one for the future.

MargaretR 16-10-2009 13:29

Re: UFOS over Preston
 
What if we got a real one on the Coppice - PB would get the credit for getting it free:D

Less 16-10-2009 13:35

Re: UFOS over Preston
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MargaretR (Post 754138)
What if we got a real one on the Coppice - PB would get the credit for getting it free:D

Nope, you've already given him the idea of taking credit for the hole and the spindle, anything else is unworthy of praise.
:rolleyes:

MargaretR 16-10-2009 13:37

Re: UFOS over Preston
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Less (Post 754148)
Nope, you've already given him the idea of taking credit for the hole and the spindle, anything else is unworthy of praise.
:rolleyes:

Now you are indirectly accusing him of being early homo sapiens - not nice:)
Nearthandel?....maybe :D

Less 16-10-2009 13:48

Re: UFOS over Preston
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MargaretR (Post 754151)
Now you are indirectly accusing him of being early homo sapiens - not nice:)
Nearthandel?....maybe :D

Oh no, theories get worse, are you laying claim to a new species? Does it come before or after, Neanderthal?

MargaretR 16-10-2009 13:54

Re: UFOS over Preston
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Less (Post 754160)
Oh no, theories get worse, are you laying claim to a new species? Does it come before or after, Neanderthal?

It arrived in the Hyndburn, post Accrington, epoch.
The peculiar behaviour of the species is yet to be understood by anthropologists.

Less 16-10-2009 13:56

Re: UFOS over Preston
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ***Mr D*** (Post 754109)
Waits for tealeaf to call ALL the believers "Fruitcakes":rolleyes::D:D

No need to disturb good old T' you are obviously getting the message without him repeating himself, (Don't you wish Life wasn't so focused on his own petty theories? He could have a field day proving in this thread that aliens have been invited over by the 'faceless' rulers to start off the cull).

MargaretR 16-10-2009 13:58

Re: UFOS over Preston
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Less (Post 754164)
No need to disturb good old T' you are obviously getting the message without him repeating himself, (Don't you wish Life wasn't so focused on his own petty theories? He could have a field day proving in this thread that aliens have been invited over by the 'faceless' rulers to start off the cull).

Now you are beginning to see the light:D

Less 16-10-2009 13:59

Re: UFOS over Preston
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MargaretR (Post 754165)
Now you are beginning to see the light:D

Perhaps, but not over Preston!

MargaretR 16-10-2009 14:02

Re: UFOS over Preston
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Less (Post 754166)
Perhaps, but not over Preston!

You need night vision goggles to overcome the limitations of primitive vision
I am thinking of buying a pair (before money loses its value)

PS we can only see with eyes the ones who want to be seen

Less 16-10-2009 14:27

Re: UFOS over Preston
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MargaretR (Post 754167)
PS we can only see with eyes the ones who want to be seen

OR,

I'll hide in the shadow's maybe the grim reaper won't notice, he'll be too busy with those with cataclysmic theories?

After all, someone must prove you right or else you and the nutters will be very disappointed.

MargaretR 16-10-2009 14:35

Re: UFOS over Preston
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Less (Post 754172)
OR,
After all, someone must prove you right or else you and the nutters will be very disappointed.

Proof exists ..... but governments haven't admitted it..............YET
patience - my dear - 'the truth is out there':D

jaysay 16-10-2009 15:44

Re: UFOS over Preston
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gayle (Post 754128)
Was this what you saw in Rossendale?

Gayle I didn't need to click the link, it wasn't there when I was going on my UFO safaris :D

jaysay 16-10-2009 15:45

Re: UFOS over Preston
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MargaretR (Post 754175)
Proof exists ..... but governments haven't admitted it..............YET
patience - my dear - 'the truth is out there':D

You mean you know the smoking man Margaret:D

MargaretR 16-10-2009 15:47

Re: UFOS over Preston
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 754197)
You mean you know the smoking man Margaret:D

I have known many men - don't remember any on fire
.....and only a few had that effect on me.

Boeing Guy 16-10-2009 22:22

Re: UFOS over Preston
 
Now i know this sounds really crazy, but and its a big but....maybe there is no conspiracy at all and maybe there are no UFO's????

I do stand to be corrected, physical evidence generally works, but have yet to see or touch any. Pictures of Mountains or photo's that can be photoshoped are not enough.:Banane30::Banane30:

MargaretR 16-10-2009 22:37

Re: UFOS over Preston
 
Mount Etna exists because I have been there.
I have doubts about Mount Everest:rolleyes:

Tealeaf 17-10-2009 10:54

Re: UFOS over Preston
 
I think it's pretty obvious that these UFO's and ET's were over in Preston to demonstrate in favour of keeping the National Football Museum there, rather than relocating it to Manchester or Sheffield, or god forbid, London.

MargaretR 17-10-2009 10:58

Re: UFOS over Preston
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tealeaf (Post 754435)
I think it's pretty obvious that these UFO's and ET's were over in Preston to demonstrate in favour of keeping the National Football Museum there, rather than relocating it to Manchester or Sheffield, or god forbid, London.

:D That was a much milder response than I expected.:D
Are you mellowing with age?
....or....are you in love?:eek:

Tealeaf 17-10-2009 11:16

Re: UFOS over Preston
 
No....I'm converted. I now believe that there are aliens amongst us, so presumably they must have used UFO's to get here. Many of this aliens regularly post here on this website...you only have to look at what has been written to realise that it originates from some other lifeform, but not as we know it (to paraphase Dr Spock).

MargaretR 17-10-2009 12:55

Re: UFOS over Preston
 
Now that you are convinced you maybe want to know more.
There are 57 varieties (none eat Heinz beans:D)
Clifford Stone, a retired US army Sergeant who served in the US Army for 22 years and participated in covert operations to retrieve crashed extraterrestrial ships and extraterrestrial biological entities (EBE’s), revealed there were a total of 57 extraterrestrial races known to the US military.

Bagpuss will get hysterical won't he?:)

more detail here-
ET Motivations

***Mr D*** 17-10-2009 12:59

Re: UFOS over Preston
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tealeaf (Post 754442)
No....I'm converted. I now believe that there are aliens amongst us.

I knew you would see the light eventually.:D

jaysay 17-10-2009 14:09

Re: UFOS over Preston
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ***Mr D*** (Post 754468)
I knew you would see the light eventually.:D

No he's just seen your posts Mr D:D

Less 17-10-2009 15:39

Re: UFOS over Preston
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ***Mr D*** (Post 754468)
I knew you would see the light eventually.:D

Ignore the evidence why don't you? Oh, I see you did, T' being a higher life form, (though we don't really know where from), has spoken, I for one would rather follow his guide than you and your stupid theories.

O.K. Tealeaf, I've said enough to make it you're round next time we meet.

***Mr D*** 18-10-2009 14:16

Re: UFOS over Preston
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Less (Post 754499)
Ignore the evidence why don't you? Oh, I see you did, T' being a higher life form, (though we don't really know where from), has spoken, I for one would rather follow his guide than you and your stupid theories.

Evidence?

I have never asked anyone to follow me, All I ask is people make there own mind up and not be a sheep.:D

Less 18-10-2009 14:53

Re: UFOS over Preston
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ***Mr D*** (Post 754700)
Evidence?

I have never asked anyone to follow me, All I ask is people make there own mind up and not be a sheep.:D

O.K. so you don't want followers and yet anyone the doesn't believe your version of the truth is labelled a sheep in your mind, if they dare to dismiss your ideas, could it not be that I and many like me, that do not agree with you are also refusing to act like sheep?

Perhaps, we have given your ideas lots of thought long ago and not just dismissed them out of hand?
We may have come to the conclusion that such prattlings aren't worth giving any credence to?
I have no problem with you having these views so long as if there are any sheep on here they don't have to fooled into believing all the ravings from you and your ilk.
:cool:

MargaretR 18-10-2009 16:16

Re: UFOS over Preston
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Less (Post 754706)
Perhaps, we have given your ideas lots of thought long ago and not just dismissed them out of hand?
We may have come to the conclusion that such prattlings aren't worth giving any credence to?

:cool:

Maybe YOU have concluded that -as is your right
...but your very use of the word 'prattlings' is your attempt to influence others to reach the same conclusions you have.
Such denigration of the opinions of others is adversarial and leads to the mud slinging contests that have caused some to cease using this forum.

Boeing Guy 18-10-2009 17:38

Re: UFOS over Preston
 
Yes, but he does have a point.
Just because I disagree with your outlook and have provided evidence against theory's
on here, I have been dismissed, ignored and considered as sheep.

MargaretR 18-10-2009 17:49

Re: UFOS over Preston
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Boeing Guy (Post 754746)
Yes, but he does have a point.
Just because I disagree with your outlook and have provided evidence against theory's
on here, I have been dismissed, ignored and considered as sheep.

I have never described you so.
Your opinion is a valuable as anyones,
and you never belittle others when expressing it
.
I dismiss the opinions of those that do.
Civilised debate is what we are here for.
Anyone's viewpoint is influenced by their experience.

Boeing Guy 18-10-2009 18:05

Re: UFOS over Preston
 
No you haven't Margaret, fair point.
Sorry if I inferred anything.

Now back to the discussion!!!!

***Mr D*** 18-10-2009 22:55

Re: UFOS over Preston
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Less (Post 754706)
O.K. so you don't want followers and yet anyone the doesn't believe your version of the truth is labelled a sheep in your mind, if they dare to dismiss your ideas, could it not be that I and many like me, that do not agree with you are also refusing to act like sheep?

Perhaps, we have given your ideas lots of thought long ago and not just dismissed them out of hand?
We may have come to the conclusion that such prattlings aren't worth giving any credence to?
I have no problem with you having these views so long as if there are any sheep on here they don't have to fooled into believing all the ravings from you and your ilk.
:cool:

Why would I want followers? my version of the truth? if you read my posts I only show what information is out there, and always say people should make up there own mind.

Many people dismiss what I like to discuss that is there right, I welcome constructive debate and a bit of fun, its what its all about (Notice the:D after the sentance in my prevous post).

jaysay 19-10-2009 09:35

Re: UFOS over Preston
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ***Mr D*** (Post 754824)
Why would I want followers? my version of the truth? if you read my posts I only show what information is out there, and always say people should make up there own mind.

Many people dismiss what I like to discuss that is there right, I welcome constructive debate and a bit of fun, its what its all about (Notice the:D after the sentance in my prevous post).

The informations out there, put there by scare mongers like yourself Mr D:D

MargaretR 19-10-2009 10:27

Re: UFOS over Preston
 
I don't find UFO info on the web to be doom filled or scary.
A person's perception is influenced by mainstream media who programme the public mind to regard this news as a threat.
When you read more about it, you get a more balanced view.
ETs are 'goodies' and 'baddies' just as we are :D
......and the good news is
there are more goodies than baddies
:D

Jaysay - you will find it tame compared to King and Koontz

Tealeaf 19-10-2009 10:41

Re: UFOS over Preston
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MargaretR (Post 754750)
Civilised debate is what we are here for.
Anyone's viewpoint is influenced by their experience.

Indeed we are. So why ruin it by posting all this codswallop about UFO's on here? There are more than enough websites catering just for the cranks, the crazies and the conspiracy theories so please, please, please take this infantile vacuity somewhere else.

MargaretR 19-10-2009 10:45

Re: UFOS over Preston
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tealeaf (Post 754875)
Indeed we are. So why ruin it by posting all this codswallop about UFO's on here? There are more than enough websites catering just for the cranks, the crazies and the conspiracy theories so please, please, please take this infantile vacuity somewhere else.

It happens to be NEWS

Gayle 19-10-2009 11:21

Re: UFOS over Preston
 
How can you be so absolutely certain that aliens don't exist?

I'm still open minded enough to accept that there is a possibility that we might not be alone, that doesn't mean I believe that they do, just that it's a possibility. I would love to have proof that aliens exist, it'd be cool.

Tealeaf 19-10-2009 11:54

Re: UFOS over Preston
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gayle (Post 754891)
How can you be so absolutely certain that aliens don't exist?

I'm still open minded enough to accept that there is a possibility that we might not be alone, that doesn't mean I believe that they do, just that it's a possibility. I would love to have proof that aliens exist, it'd be cool.

Many years ago, lots of people in this country and elsewhere in Western civilisation believed in the existance of unicorns, griffins, dragons, mermaids, firedrakes, hydras and a whole plethora of exotic and wonderful beasts. Despite centuries of the best efforts of science, no evidence of their ever or current presence on this planet has been found. I doubt that even the likes of Margaret or Mr D would now believe in such creatures, although had they been around a millenia ago they would probably have been in Accy town centre every sunday morning making speeches on such supposed entelechy.
The simple point is that, like the strange creatures of the past, there is no verifiable scientific evidence of of 'saucers' and little green men and so the only logical conclusion is that they do not exist.

Gayle 19-10-2009 12:03

Re: UFOS over Preston
 
That's because we've explored our planet so we know what there is on it. We haven't explored outer space yet so how can you say there isn't something out there?

You're possibly right, there possibly isn't anything out there and we're completely alone in the universe, the only planet to sustain any form of life. BUT, my point is - that we don't actually know that for certain yet so it's a bit unfair to call it rubbish or codswallop when there is the possibility that it is you who could be wrong.

MargaretR 19-10-2009 12:05

Re: UFOS over Preston
 
Just because the evidence has been witheld from mainstream media, doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
I have mentioned in another thread that there are whistleblower archeologists who have found the evidence and it has been commandeered and 'buried' in the vaults of The Smithsonian Institute.

All this discussion about what is and what isn't true will be over by year end.
All indications are that Disclosure will happen soon.
YouTube - UFO files to be released under Obama Open Government Memoranda - Transition Team Chief John Podesta
After that, info that has been supressed for 60 yrs will emerge, including archeological evidence about ancient contact with ETs

***Mr D*** 19-10-2009 12:11

Re: UFOS over Preston
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tealeaf (Post 754875)
Indeed we are. So why ruin it by posting all this codswallop about UFO's on here? There are more than enough websites catering just for the cranks, the crazies and the conspiracy theories so please, please, please take this infantile vacuity somewhere else.

Same could be said for the political threds.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gayle (Post 754905)
That's because we've explored our planet so we know what there is on it. We haven't explored outer space yet so how can you say there isn't something out there?

We havent fully explored our oceans or our planet fully.

I mean we still find new species here on earth now, if you look at hte size of the universe, you have to be pretty closed minded to think that we are the only life force.

Tealeaf 19-10-2009 12:40

Re: UFOS over Preston
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gayle (Post 754905)
That's because we've explored our planet so we know what there is on it. We haven't explored outer space yet so how can you say there isn't something out there?

I don't know what is out there; neither does science - that is what lots of boffins are trying to find out. What is being posted on here is all about UFO's supposedly visiting this planet and about conspiracies to cover up such drop-ins. It is about idiots who claimed to have been kidnapped by these visitors and it is about more imbeciles who claim to be in telepathic contact with their extra-terrestrial cousins. It is about simpletons and schizoids who see and photograph any aircraft and claim it is a UFO.
Quite simply, there is no verifiable evidence for such phenomena and I can only recommend that if you are are taking such nonsense seriously you visit your GP and ask him to make an appointment for you to see a psychiatrist.

MargaretR 19-10-2009 12:42

Re: UFOS over Preston
 
YouTube - Canada Admits - Alien Technology Operated by the USA

Former Canadian Minister of Defence releases information that the USA is using Alien Technology.

Mexico 'reveals'
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iQgF4...eature=related

There are none so blind as those who will not see

Tealeaf 19-10-2009 12:50

Re: UFOS over Preston
 
...another couple of crackpots...

Less 19-10-2009 14:55

Re: UFOS over Preston
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MargaretR (Post 754906)
J
All this discussion about what is and what isn't true will be over by year end.

Ah so you've moved the date from November the first? Or as your mate say's according to the Mayan calender the 6th?

I don't remember you mentioning there will be a delay? What's happened? Wrong reality, or wrong stimulants?
Quote:

Gayle = That's because we've explored our planet so we know what there is on it. We haven't explored outer space yet so how can you say there isn't something out there?

You're possibly right, there possibly isn't anything out there and we're completely alone in the universe, the only planet to sustain any form of life. BUT, my point is - that we don't actually know that for certain yet so it's a bit unfair to call it rubbish or codswallop when there is the possibility that it is you who could be wrong.
As has already been mentioned we haven't quite, explored our planet, however, I think I'll go along with Patrick Moore he is more believable than most.

Quote:

Despite believing that there may well be life in other parts of the universe, he has stated that he believes that there has not been any real contact with aliens and he dismisses all theories of the extraterrestrial origin of UFOs.
O.K. I've taken it from wiki, Patrick Moore - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
but even they print the 'real' truth sometimes!
http://www.tiptopglobe.com/skin/smile/s3417.gif

MargaretR 19-10-2009 15:12

Re: UFOS over Preston
 
1 Attachment(s)
November 6th is the start of a spell lasting 360 days during which several unexpected strange events are prophesied to occur and for which no detail was provided, except to say that they won't be good news
nice of you to take an interest in my blog:D

In order to get anywhere near convincing me of your ideas of what is the truth, you will have to come up with someone with more authority than Patrick Moore

andrewb 19-10-2009 15:15

Re: UFOS over Preston
 
There's two things going on here. There are people expressing whether there is a possibility of alien life existing somewhere. Then there are the conspiracy theorists who believe we're already living among them, or that they've at least landed and there's a massive coverup by the US government that will come out by year end. Can we not keep the latter to David Icke style websites? David Icke is of course the guy that was a professional footballer but then switched to conspiracy theories about how the world is lead by an elite whom are actually reptilian not human. Queen Elizabeth II is even a reptile, he alleges. Comeon, can we not keep the conspiracies there? It wouldn't surprise me if Margaret etc were registered on those sites anyway.

MargaretR 19-10-2009 15:19

Re: UFOS over Preston
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by andrewb (Post 754942)
There's two things going on here. There are people expressing whether there is a possibility of alien life existing somewhere. Then there are the conspiracy theorists who believe we're already living among them, or that they've at least landed and there's a massive coverup by the US government that will come out by year end. Can we not keep the latter to David Icke style websites? David Icke is of course the guy that was a professional footballer but then switched to conspiracy theories about how the world is lead by an elite whom are actually reptilian not human. Queen Elizabeth II is even a reptile, he alleges. Comeon, can we not keep the conspiracies there? It wouldn't surprise me if Margaret etc were registered on those sites anyway.

Its quite an interesting discussion isn't it?
...and now we are keeping it civilised, without mudslinging innuendos, more people are likely to read it.
Just because it doesn't fit one mod's version of the truth, there is no reason for it to get moved to Anything Goes.:D

andrewb 19-10-2009 15:23

Re: UFOS over Preston
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MargaretR (Post 754943)
Its quite an interesting discussion isn't it?
...and now we are keeping it civilised, without mudslinging innuendos, more people are likely to read it.
Just because it doesn't fit one mod's version of the truth, there is no reason for it to get moved to Anything Goes.:D

I don't think the latter conspiracy theorists are interesting no. I think they should go back to posting on the far out conspiracy theory websites where everyone there can indulge their fairy tales.

Less 19-10-2009 15:24

Re: UFOS over Preston
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MargaretR (Post 754941)
nice of you to take an interest in my blog:D

No interest in your blog, you posted it in 'get a life's' thread about being the 1st of November and he being a comrade of yours had to interject and let us know that you don't really have a clue because according to the 'Mayan' calendar it's the 6th!

So could you and he get into a huddle and agree on which bit of bull's manure you wish to spread just so it has an honest ring to it.
:)

MargaretR 19-10-2009 15:25

Re: UFOS over Preston
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by andrewb (Post 754944)
I don't think the latter conspiracy theorists are interesting no. I think they should go back to posting on the far out conspiracy theory websites where everyone there can indulge their fairy tales.

You contribution/opinion is welcome:)
...so you will stop reading it now - unless mud slinging starts when your intervention will be very welcome

MargaretR 19-10-2009 15:28

Re: UFOS over Preston
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Less (Post 754945)
bull's manure
:)

Oh dear - here we go again:rolleyes:

andrewb 19-10-2009 15:30

Re: UFOS over Preston
 
Seriously.. Why do you have to post it all here? Can't you just have a far out website linked in your signature and then we can go there if we're really that interested in fairy tales?

Less 19-10-2009 15:31

Re: UFOS over Preston
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MargaretR (Post 754943)
Just because it doesn't fit one mod's version of the truth, there is no reason for it to get moved to Anything Goes.:D

I'll bet you it isn't just one mod' but without the proof, (such as with who's fault it is someone isn't posting), I would only be spreading a conspiracy, (or perhaps even a lie?).

http://www.tiptopglobe.com/skin/smile/s12498.gif

MargaretR 19-10-2009 15:36

Re: UFOS over Preston
 
I suspect that ROY is delighted that something other than 'what kitty had for dinner' is generating so many posts and visits to his forum

andrewb 19-10-2009 15:46

Re: UFOS over Preston
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MargaretR (Post 754954)
I suspect that ROY is delighted that something other than 'what kitty had for dinner' is generating so many posts and visits to his forum

If you got 100 of your friends from your conspiracy forums to come here and start posting then yes I'm sure there'd be a load of posts and views. They're not the sort of posts we'd want here though.

Again, why don't you share a link to your conspiracy forums and let us go there if we're interested in the fairy tales?

Less 19-10-2009 15:50

Re: UFOS over Preston
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MargaretR (Post 754954)
I suspect that ROY is delighted that something other than 'what kitty had for dinner' is generating so many posts and visits to his forum

Nope not vulnerable there, 2/10 for trying, I throw the cat in as an aside, if you've been on here long enough, you'll also remember I and others used to spend most of our time in anything goes making up little humorous? stories, but we don't have time for that, a new generation of nutters are trying to seize control and can't help but go in there and ruin it for those that used to enjoy. Oh, if only we could get back to those Halcyon days!

http://www.tiptopglobe.com/skin/smile/s5831.gif

***Mr D*** 19-10-2009 17:00

Re: UFOS over Preston
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by andrewb (Post 754942)
There's two things going on here. There are people expressing whether there is a possibility of alien life existing somewhere. Then there are the conspiracy theorists who believe we're already living among them, or that they've at least landed and there's a massive coverup by the US government that will come out by year end. Can we not keep the latter to David Icke style websites? David Icke is of course the guy that was a professional footballer but then switched to conspiracy theories about how the world is lead by an elite whom are actually reptilian not human. Queen Elizabeth II is even a reptile, he alleges. Comeon, can we not keep the conspiracies there? It wouldn't surprise me if Margaret etc were registered on those sites anyway.

Just one thing going on, people are expressing their opinion.

Quote:

Originally Posted by andrewb (Post 754944)
I don't think the latter conspiracy theorists are interesting no. I think they should go back to posting on the far out conspiracy theory websites where everyone there can indulge their fairy tales.

Some people do find the posts on here intersting and enjoyable. I mean look at the view count and post count on the threds.

Quote:

Originally Posted by andrewb (Post 754950)
Seriously.. Why do you have to post it all here? Can't you just have a far out website linked in your signature and then we can go there if we're really that interested in fairy tales?

Let see, being a member of a forum means posting various stuff? (as I do) as you have quoted your self in the past if everything was the same it would be boring.

Post it all here, give over.

Quote:

Originally Posted by andrewb (Post 754958)
If you got 100 of your friends from your conspiracy forums to come here and start posting then yes I'm sure there'd be a load of posts and views. They're not the sort of posts we'd want here though.

Again, why don't you share a link to your conspiracy forums and let us go there if we're interested in the fairy tales?

Again same could be said about the political threds.

I dont see what a few members problem is, Its not like the forum is bombarded with new posts stating conspiracy theries, I mean im all up for a bit of banter and never take anything to serious in the replys I get and love a debate and a bit of fishing;).

Eric 19-10-2009 19:10

Re: UFOS over Preston
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Less (Post 754935)
Ah so you've moved the date from November the first? Or as your mate say's according to the Mayan calender the 6th?

I don't remember you mentioning there will be a delay? What's happened? Wrong reality, or wrong stimulants?


As has already been mentioned we haven't quite, explored our planet, however, I think I'll go along with Patrick Moore he is more believable than most.


O.K. I've taken it from wiki, Patrick Moore - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
but even they print the 'real' truth sometimes!
http://www.tiptopglobe.com/skin/smile/s3417.gif

Have to agree that we haven't come close to exploring this planet ... and I don't mean that in the sense that we have yet to capture the Loch Ness Monster, the Yeti, the Sasquatch and even the Okopogo.

Also, there is a helluva lot of difference between being "believable" and "telling the truth." Seems to me that a lot of you guys over there believed Tony Blair before the invasion of Iraq, but how many now will state that this "believable" politician was telling the truth?:rolleyes:

TAY70 22-10-2009 21:38

Re: UFOS over Preston
 
is this a spaceship on the coppice!
http://i35.tinypic.com/53uvm8.jpg

Eric 22-10-2009 21:51

Re: UFOS over Preston
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by andrewb (Post 754958)
If you got 100 of your friends from your conspiracy forums to come here and start posting then yes I'm sure there'd be a load of posts and views. They're not the sort of posts we'd want here though.

Again, why don't you share a link to your conspiracy forums and let us go there if we're interested in the fairy tales?

What's this "we" crap? You becoming so arrogant that you presume to speak for others? Or, perhaps, it's the Royal "we":rolleyes:

Less 23-10-2009 00:40

Re: UFOS over Preston
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Eric (Post 755724)
What's this "we" crap? You becoming so arrogant that you presume to speak for others? Or, perhaps, it's the Royal "we":rolleyes:

It's perfectly legitimate English to use the term we, when you know that there are more than just you, with a similar point of view.

Just as the conspiracy people, (notice a plural), can use it if they wish to.

No arrogance about using the correct format he is not presuming he is speaking for himself and others, but he did it without breaking the forum rules and swearing which seems to be your standard of English.
:rolleyes::)

Eric 23-10-2009 01:42

Re: UFOS over Preston
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Less (Post 755747)
It's perfectly legitimate English to use the term we, when you know that there are more than just you, with a similar point of view.

Just as the conspiracy people, (notice a plural), can use it if they wish to.

No arrogance about using the correct format he is not presuming he is speaking for himself and others, but he did it without breaking the forum rules and swearing which seems to be your standard of English.
:rolleyes::)

"We", as he uses it, is arrogant assumption; and its implications of some sort of elitism, or, at least, superiority, is obvious.

I think I share my standard of English with Chaucer.:rolleyes:


All times are GMT. The time now is 17:54.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com