![]() |
Re: Brown asks Voters to give Labour a second look
i sure know enough to call em thugs n those who vote fer em stupid. whilst we all know the main partys have done sod all to grasp the immigration nettle, anyone interested enough should lobby/ campaign em to get off the pot, its as simple as that in my view.
|
Re: Brown asks Voters to give Labour a second look
Quote:
Again, I'll raise the subject of the Black Police Officer's Association. Just remind me why that isn't considered racist? |
Re: Brown asks Voters to give Labour a second look
Quote:
Oh, no not down the slippery slope to racism again? We already know some folk are more equal than others in many coloured skins. Aren't there more valid examples of inequality that could serve your purpose just as well? Schools, public transport, so on & so on. Or is it easier to stir up the emotions at the expense of 'race'? :p |
Re: Brown asks Voters to give Labour a second look
Quote:
|
Re: Brown asks Voters to give Labour a second look
Quote:
One is racist and yet the other is not. Difference of perspective. Personally speaking, either both are racist or neither are. |
Re: Brown asks Voters to give Labour a second look
Oh dear, it looks as though I have committed something of a faux-pas. Not to worry, easily mended. I half inched the list with which I started this thread from the comments appended to an article in last Sunday's Telegraph, The poster of said comment was annonymous so I couldn't really apportion credit. I actually think the list has been floating around the web in different forms for quite a while, so accurate attribution would be well nigh impossible anyway.
Sorry to disappoint you Mancie but, I don't think that because the list is unattributable it makes it any less valid as a stick with which to beat an incompetent and potentially treasonous administration. As for the Flan Flinger jibe...yeah, right, whatever.:rolleyes: |
Re: Brown asks Voters to give Labour a second look
Quote:
|
Re: Brown asks Voters to give Labour a second look
Quote:
A master of manipulation wouldn't find it too difficult. Lets see if we can stop this drift by substituting a different example Off the top of my head equally emotive and also without much hope of being fixed in my lifetime by any party, how about the NHS that should get the old 'rivers of blood' attitude a good airing Not enough blood donors, not enough organ donors, not enough politicians wanting to grasp this embarrassingly weeping sore and give it a decent injection that could mean a cure for many a poor soul and if you want to play the touch of a racist card heavily dependent on people of all colours helping for very little reward. :cool: |
Re: Brown asks Voters to give Labour a second look
Quote:
|
Re: Brown asks Voters to give Labour a second look
Quote:
:golly: |
Re: Brown asks Voters to give Labour a second look
Quote:
|
Re: Brown asks Voters to give Labour a second look
Quote:
All I would ask is that they do actually wait till I'm gone..... |
Re: Brown asks Voters to give Labour a second look
And then we come to Graham's wish list...
If you recall I asked Graham how he replied to, and could morally defend, the charges laid against his party during their 13 year administration. His reply; it all depends on how you look at it. I also asked him how he would persuade voters to give his party another five years in office. His reply; a wish list. It is the same tired, meaningless tripe that I have heard spouted at every election by every candidate since I first became old enough to vote. The only difference in this wish list are the references to private landlords, which I happen to know is a particular hobby horse of Graham's. At the time of the last General Election I dimly recall writing on here that one should approach the selection of an MP as though one were an employer with a £60k job on offer. I advised that the voter should disregard party loyalty and cast their vote for the person best qualified to undertake the job. And though no one took my advice and voted Greg -Yes, Chief Whip - Pope into the position for another term, I stand by my original advice. Your MP must work for you. He is sent to Parliament to represent your views and make your voice heard at the heart of Government. If he cannot do that, if all he can do is spout the party line, and carry on holding political grudges dating back a quarter of a century then I suggest that, despite his local connections, he is not the best man for the job. This is a pity, because Graham is an effective Councillor and I know he has worked very hard to make the lives of his constituents better. But perhaps, local people and local issues in a local arena are his forte. I wrote the other day that I wished for an MP with a bit of umphf, a bit of fizz and presence about them. Nice chap though he is, sadly, Graham does not fit the bill. The list and this thread were intended to give him an opportunity to impress on us what a godsend to us all he would make as our MP. And what do we get... It depends on how you look at it...and a rerun of the 1980's. If you think I am being partial, wait till the conservatives make their selection. |
Re: Brown asks Voters to give Labour a second look
Quote:
http://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f...ion-51153.html Now, while I'm sitting in a queue patiently awaiting some action, what views about waiting lists, (Oy' Jaysay I know your dying to say something but back in line until your names called). :) |
Re: Brown asks Voters to give Labour a second look
Quote:
The whole crux of your opening question was based on a 13-year grudge and a biased list of slip ups that you cribbed from someone else. Graham is supposed to come back at that without a list of counter-arguments? Plus, Greg Pope stood down of his own accord. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 07:44. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com