Accrington Web

Accrington Web (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/index.php)
-   General Chat (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f69/)
-   -   Cllr Britcliffe is doing things right! (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f69/cllr-britcliffe-is-doing-things-right-55112.html)

Neil 06-10-2010 17:34

Re: Cllr Britcliffe is doing things right!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by gynn (Post 850351)
There is "shoddy" and there is "no option to demolish". The Council has discretion over the former, but has a statutory responsibility over the latter.

Ok thats fair enough. How do they decide how much to pay for the properties?

jaysay 06-10-2010 17:42

Re: Cllr Britcliffe is doing things right!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Neil (Post 850325)
I best go and spank myself for taking us off thread

Naughty Naughty Neil:whip:

gynn 06-10-2010 17:54

Re: Cllr Britcliffe is doing things right!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Neil (Post 850359)
Ok thats fair enough. How do they decide how much to pay for the properties?

Unless things have changed since I was around in local government, it is the District Valuer that provides an independent valuation..

Valuation Office Agency - homepage

JCB 06-10-2010 18:19

Re: Cllr Britcliffe is doing things right!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MargaretR (Post 850275)
I doubt whether many of the residents of Pendle St actually had buildings insurance.
'

My friend whom I mentioned did have insurance .
She kept her house in good condition .
A widow , she had lived in the house since her marriage in the 1960s .
It had many memories for her , and although some , not all , of the property around her was neglected she wanted to stay there .

In 1994 the renovation of the other 3 terraces in the street was completed . For some reason her terrace wasn't renovated . The row of houses back to her on Fountain St weren't renovated , but the terrace facing them on Fountain St was .

All so strange and confusing .

Neil 06-10-2010 18:25

Re: Cllr Britcliffe is doing things right!
 
I want mine renovating for free as well please. We are in a conservation area but I don't see HBC or LCC conserving anything :(

jaysay 06-10-2010 18:38

Re: Cllr Britcliffe is doing things right!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Neil (Post 850373)
I want mine renovating for free as well please. We are in a conservation area but I don't see HBC or LCC conserving anything :(

You live on one of the nicest streets in Ossy:D

Neil 06-10-2010 21:47

Re: Cllr Britcliffe is doing things right!
 
I know but there is still no conservation done here

Alan Varrechia 06-10-2010 22:09

Re: Cllr Britcliffe is doing things right!
 
Nice streets and Ossy. Come on Jay which one do you mean????

jaysay 07-10-2010 09:16

Re: Cllr Britcliffe is doing things right!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Alan Varrechia (Post 850426)
Nice streets and Ossy. Come on Jay which one do you mean????

Sorry Alan won't put anybodies abode on here, would get my hands and face smacked by the mods, and it could be worse in Neils case as he is a MOD:eek::eek: :D Any way they are all nice streets in Ossy, God's own country:D

g jones 10-10-2010 22:09

Re: Cllr Britcliffe is doing things right!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Neil (Post 849706)
That was a bad move in my opinion.

I think Council houses should remain Under Council control but should be managed correctly.
Why can a private company manage upgrade the houses when the Council could not?
I also disagree with selling Council houses to tenants at reduced prices. Its like burning Council Tax payers money.

I agree. I did not vote for stock transfer as it gave away the peoples money/assets accrued over decades with little return. RTB should have been good thing but has been a disaster. Poorly thought out, badly executed.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ken Moss (Post 850194)
As Neil has posted, the magic wand called 'buildings insurance' which would have sorted the whole problem out.

For some reason the council promised to take it on during an election campaign and all of a sudden we're left with a collossal liability that we can't do a thing with.

You're coming across well as a Tory sympathiser but if Labour had done the same thing I don't think we'd be having this discussion. I wouldn't be happy if our lot had been responsible either.

A good example of council acquisitions is South Shore/Blackpool Street in Oswaldtwistle which I have seen recently and am very impressed with. Again, the management could have been better but buying up empty houses and trying to bring them back into use for first-time buyers is a good idea and one that I'm pursuing. The timing just happened to be lousy in this instance but it wasn't really anyone's fault that the housing market chose that particular moment to collapse.

Blackpool and SS St. IIRC 19 of the 27 were owned by private landlords who had run the properties down. It is in St Andrews Ward. The council spent around £1.4million IIRC of Council Tax (equivalent to £42 per property in Hyndburn) doing them up with no return, ie the landlords got a free property repair worth around £40,000 per property. I could be slightly out with the figures as memories merge!

Subsequent surveys,though i made the point prior, surveys were not required it was obvious, that internal works serve no purpose and in some cases enforcement can be used for external works including appearance.

This should have been the option. It was an option I did point out at the time. We should not be doing up private landlords properties for them to simply make more money from.

Quote:

Originally Posted by gynn (Post 850287)
The houses in Pendle Street didn't fall into disrepair overnight. It was a process that took several years, so buildings insurance (renewable annually) would have long since ceased to be available.

The Council always used to deal with with such problems through its Slum Clearance programme, and got the money back from central government. Nowadays it has to meet the costs itself. It doesn't have a choice if the houses are in a bad enough state (as the surveys apparently show).It is a statutory duty.

Don't blame the ruling group. Blame the system.

This misses the whole point. At each sale point an individual survey should have been carried out revealing the damage to the foundations. Those that noticed it should have had retrospective claim on he surveyors. Or if the defects were discovered later, on their buildings insurance.

Like Blackpool Street,if the Council has to step in then in short it wants all of it's investment back in the form of equity.

Most properties are landlord owned on this block. Most done by cash sale with no insurance or survey. The Council should pay the actual value.

The cost is now £2.3m to be paid by every Council Tax payer in Hyndburn. Or £70 per household. I think there are 21 houses?? Or thereabouts.

garinda 25-11-2011 09:10

Re: Cllr Britcliffe is doing things right!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ken Moss (Post 849463)
New member vimtocreed has put it to the forum that Peter Britcliffe must surely be doing something right:

http://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/849408-post35.html

It has been levelled at me, quite fairly, that I have not exactly been over-complimentary of the Hyndburn Conservative policies, with particular reference to Peter Britcliffe's way of doing things.

To balance things out it would be nice to hear about some of the things that the public at large think he has done well.

Over to you....

I heard he's kind to small animals.

Which is nice.


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:49.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com