![]() |
The Beacon
I personally don't agree with it as it doesn't tell the public anything they don't already know from the popular press and from glancing through it you wouldn't think that the Labour and Independent councillors do anything at all in the borough.
Still, it's your tax money and I think you deserve to know that the production costs for the Autumn 2010 edition of the Beacon were £2,018. Hyndburn Borough Council's own staff distributed them and these costs were £500 making a grand total of £2,518. Nice that they got it out to the public in time for the Baxenden bye-election though. |
Re: The Beacon
I did post, after retrieving it from the recycling sack, that it wasn't as bad as I'd thought it'd be, and was better than the similar paper from L.C.C.
Is it worth those cost, to me? No. There are cheaper ways useful information can be obtained, and all the feel good articles, telling us how good our council is, will be picked up by the real press. If indeed such 'stories' are deemed newsworthy. |
Re: The Beacon
Sorry Ken never seen a copy:mad:
|
Re: The Beacon
Quote:
Baxenden got theirs first I believe, Rishton's only remaining Tory councillor is up in the local elections next year. There'll be a lot of perceived electioneering going on in the next six months I expect. I went to see Cllr Britcliffe last week to lobby for some money for a new heating system for the Rishton Scouts and was told that there was no money in the borough for that sort of thing and they'd have to apply for a grant, with helpful hints as to where I might suggest to the Scout Leader. Lo and behold, five days later Cllr Horne had managed to secure the money from the Leader of the Council. The Scouts have their money and will be warm for winter which is all that really matters but it gives you an insight into how impossible things are if you're wearing the wrong coloured badge. The needs of the residents are secondary to a photo in the paper. |
Re: The Beacon
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: The Beacon
Quote:
|
Re: The Beacon
Quote:
|
Re: The Beacon
Quote:
Although it isn't expensive per household it was a very biased publication and I suspect went straight in the recycling bag of the majority of residents. £2,518 would have been better spent in Rishton (as an example) on planting up the rose bed with new plants after Parks and Open Spaces have had their money cut, with the remainder going on some kissing gates to stop horse riders churning up the park. To my mind, any actual physical improvements to wards are better use of money than self-aggrandising literature of any kind and you will find my attitude remains much the same when there is a shift in control. |
Re: The Beacon
Quote:
Thus the cost would be zero, because those costs are already covered. Not an extra £2,518.00. |
Re: The Beacon
Oh, and those lovely calendars, that some of us are lucky enough to receive.
They have useful information on them, as well as the pretty pictures. |
Re: The Beacon
Quote:
A vast number of people put anything that's posted unsolicited through their letterbox, straight into the recycling sack. I did. I only retrieved it so I felt more able to comment on it. |
Re: The Beacon
Quote:
|
Re: The Beacon
Quote:
'Aren't we good'. Nothing wrong with that, if it didn't cost us anything, and the money couldn't be better spent in a thousand different ways in Hyndburn. Again, as posted earlier, any real stories, regarding the good work the council does, would make it into the local newspapers, if they are of any real news interest. |
Re: The Beacon
Quote:
|
Re: The Beacon
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 03:56. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com