Accrington Web

Accrington Web (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/index.php)
-   General Chat (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f69/)
-   -   Councillors expenses (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f69/councillors-expenses-56490.html)

Ken Moss 25-01-2011 06:35

Re: Councillors expenses
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Neil (Post 877798)
I don't think Cllr's should sit on scrutiny panels. It could be a job I would be good at :D

The scrutineers (sounds like a bunch of pirates) are nothing to do with the Cabinet and so are one step removed. I have to say that by and large the Resources committee that I sit on doesn't pull its punches with picking policies to bits and has an excellent chair in the form of Cllr Hayes.

The problem I have with it is that it barely has influence on Cabinet decisions, let alone power. If I call a portfoilio holder in for scrutiny they may simply decide to send someone in their place. Grilling the monkey instead of the organ grinder passes the buck of culpability.

Ken Moss 25-01-2011 06:44

Re: Councillors expenses
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by gynn (Post 877818)
One of the other changes I've seen is the responsibility taken by cabinet members that usually fell in the past to chief officers. Nowadays, press releases always refer to the portfolio holder, rather than the Director of Health or the Director of Housing etc. Officers have gone from being high profile to being virtually anonymous. In the past, the Chief Executive was as well known locally, and quoted as often as, the Leader. Now, he or she is virtually anonymous.

I'm not saying that's a good or a bad thing, I'm just making the observation

That's one thing I am in favour of unless it has been discussed with the officer in question beforehand. Councillors sign up for a life in the public eye, council officers generally just want a job and I don't see any reason for them to become the focus for something which may end up being an unpopular move. If they're simply carrying out the instructions of the Cabinet then it is for the council to decide whether they are doing a good job, not for the public to decide based on the popularity of a policy.

In my view, civil servants enact policy, councillors take the credit or the blame for their own ideas.

Ken Moss 25-01-2011 06:59

Re: Councillors expenses
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 877789)
Well Ken I've never seen the new system in operation, just read about it mainly on here, but if you think a change of colour at scaitcliffe house, would make wholesale chances your more naive than I though you were

Oh God, here we go.....

I'm sure that when Labour take control again AccyWeb will be awash with Conservative councillors and the reds will disappear into the ether, never to be heard from again. What surprises me is that you're so absolutely sure of how Labour will play the game. Virtually all the councillors are different from when you were involved in politics and times have changed ever so slightly. You of all people should therefore realise that any reforms will need about 12 months to have any impact but I'm afraid wholesale changes aren't really an option, they're a necessity.

Better let Peter know, if he's still writing the songs then he'll need to make them too.

steeljack 25-01-2011 07:34

Re: Councillors expenses
 
Ken Moss ...(town center thread ) ..I've spent a fair bit of time in Accy this past six months and as someone who hasn't grown up here I'm not as critical as those who have watched its decline.

(sorry don't know how to join two threads together )


Quote:

Originally Posted by Ken Moss (Post 877879)
Councillors sign up for a life in the public eye, council officers generally just want a job and I don't see any reason for them to become the focus

In my view, civil servants enact policy, councillors take the credit or the blame for their own ideas.

not being critical Ken .. but maybe you need to ask one or two of your Labour colleagues who have lived in Hyndburn for a few more years than you about a chap with the surname Rix , seem to remember he used to wield quite a bit of power when he was a Council employee ... whatever happened to him :rolleyes:

am sure Jaysay can add to the story ..

Ken Moss 25-01-2011 07:37

Re: Councillors expenses
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by steeljack (Post 877884)
Ken Moss ...(town center thread ) ..I've spent a fair bit of time in Accy this past six months and as someone who hasn't grown up here I'm not as critical as those who have watched its decline.

(sorry don't know how to join two threads together )

not being critical Ken .. but maybe you need to ask one or two of your Labour colleagues who have lived in Hyndburn for a few more years than you about a chap with the surname Rix , seem to remember he used to wield quite a bit of power when he was a Council employee ... whatever happened to him :rolleyes:

If I've given the impression that I expect council employees to be neutered puppets then that's not what I'm trying to say at all. There are some very influential and highly competent officers at HBC, I'm just saying that I don't think it's terribly fair to drag them into political slanging matches when they're simply trying to do their job.

steeljack 25-01-2011 07:43

Re: Councillors expenses
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ken Moss (Post 877879)
That's one thing I am in favour of unless it has been discussed with the officer in question beforehand. Councillors sign up for a life in the public eye, council officers generally just want a job and I don't see any reason for them to become the focus for something which may end up being an unpopular move. If they're simply carrying out the instructions of the Cabinet then it is for the council to decide whether they are doing a good job, not for the public to decide based on the popularity of a policy.

In my view, civil servants enact policy, councillors take the credit or the blame for their own ideas.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ken Moss (Post 877885)
If I've given the impression that I expect council employees to be neutered puppets then that's not what I'm trying to say at all. There are some very influential and highly competent officers at HBC, I'm just saying that I don't think it's terribly fair to drag them into political slanging matches when they're simply trying to do their job.

just check out the history of the Rix guy and his connections , the guy was so smooth he gave Accrington/Hyndburn a prostate exam without needing the lube or the discomfort :D

jaysay 25-01-2011 08:48

Re: Councillors expenses
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 877812)
...and what first attracted you to the job of being Peter Britcliffe's agent?

:rolleyes::D:eek:

Was never his agent, next quesation:D

jaysay 25-01-2011 08:56

Re: Councillors expenses
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ken Moss (Post 877881)
Oh God, here we go.....

I'm sure that when Labour take control again AccyWeb will be awash with Conservative councillors and the reds will disappear into the ether, never to be heard from again. What surprises me is that you're so absolutely sure of how Labour will play the game. Virtually all the councillors are different from when you were involved in politics and times have changed ever so slightly. You of all people should therefore realise that any reforms will need about 12 months to have any impact but I'm afraid wholesale changes aren't really an option, they're a necessity.

Better let Peter know, if he's still writing the songs then he'll need to make them too.

You've probable insulted Peter a couple of dozen times since I last spoke to him, I certainly ain't heard from anybody on HBC since well before Xmas the only person I've seen is Ken Hargreaves, and we've better things to talk about than politics;) As for Labour councillors disappearing, they certainly were nowhere to be seen when Flash Gordon was saving the Universe single handed so I don't think things will change, as for an influx of Tories on here, I doubt it, if they couldn't make capital when Labour were in government doubt if they'll bother at all:rolleyes:

jaysay 25-01-2011 08:57

Re: Councillors expenses
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ken Moss (Post 877885)
If I've given the impression that I expect council employees to be neutered puppets then that's not what I'm trying to say at all. There are some very influential and highly competent officers at HBC, I'm just saying that I don't think it's terribly fair to drag them into political slanging matches when they're simply trying to do their job.

Thats strange, wasn't the case between 1986 and 1999;)

garinda 25-01-2011 08:57

Re: Councillors expenses
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 877895)
Was never his agent, next quesation:D

What was it called then, that you did for him?

Santa's little helper?

:rolleyes:

jaysay 25-01-2011 09:00

Re: Councillors expenses
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by steeljack (Post 877887)
just check out the history of the Rix guy and his connections , the guy was so smooth he gave Accrington/Hyndburn a prostate exam without needing the lube or the discomfort :D

:rofl38::rofl38::rofl38::rofl38:Never heard him describe quite like that SJ:D

Ken Moss 25-01-2011 09:07

Re: Councillors expenses
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 877896)
You've probable insulted Peter a couple of dozen times since I last spoke to him, I certainly ain't heard from anybody on HBC since well before Xmas the only person I've seen is Ken Hargreaves, and we've better things to talk about than politics;) As for Labour councillors disappearing, they certainly were nowhere to be seen when Flash Gordon was saving the Universe single handed so I don't think things will change, as for an influx of Tories on here, I doubt it, if they couldn't make capital when Labour were in government doubt if they'll bother at all:rolleyes:

Still not heard a single bad word about Ken Hargreaves but unfortunately I haven't met him either.

As regards Labour councillors on AccyWeb, I joined about a year ago when Gordon Brown was still Prime Minister and as far as I can tell we seemed to be more active then than we are now!

Mind you, three little birds have now told me that this particular message forum is known at Britcliffe HQ as 'KenWeb' so perhaps I'm unfairly hogging the limelight.

Hi Peter! Are you not playing out today? Always room for one more on KenWeb!

garinda 25-01-2011 09:12

Re: Councillors expenses
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ken Moss (Post 877901)
Still not heard a single bad word about Ken Hargreaves but unfortunately I haven't met him either.

As regards Labour councillors on AccyWeb, I joined about a year ago when Gordon Brown was still Prime Minister and as far as I can tell we seemed to be more active then than we are now!

Mind you, three little birds have now told me that this particular message forum is known at Britcliffe HQ as 'KenWeb' so perhaps I'm unfairly hogging the limelight.

Hi Peter! Are you not playing out today? Always room for one more on KenWeb!

http://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/m...ffice-hbc.html

Don't forget you can send other members a friend request.

Ken Moss 25-01-2011 09:15

Re: Councillors expenses
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 877906)
http://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/m...ffice-hbc.html

Don't forget you can send other members a friend request.

I might just do that, as an act of cross-party solidarity and in an effort to engender wider-ranging non-political debates within the confines of the neutral discussion ground that is Accrington Web.

Then again, he told me in full council he wouldn't be adding me as a Facebook friend, so I'm taking me bat n ball in.

garinda 25-01-2011 09:18

Re: Councillors expenses
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ken Moss (Post 877909)
Then again, he told me in full council he wouldn't be adding me as a Facebook friend, so I'm taking me bat n ball in.

You could still give him a good poke.

You don't need to be his Facebook friend to have that pleasure.

Ken Moss 25-01-2011 09:23

Re: Councillors expenses
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 877911)
You could still give him a good poke.

You don't need to be his Facebook friend to have that pleasure.

So I understand, marvellous thing this interweb. A virtual version of sexual assault.

I still think I'll give it a miss. It was pointed out that he's signed up to the 'Keep Petrol Under £1.00 per litre' campaign and the waves of pleasure that his Facebook publicity gave him were quite enough for one council.

jaysay 25-01-2011 10:42

Re: Councillors expenses
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ken Moss (Post 877909)
I might just do that, as an act of cross-party solidarity and in an effort to engender wider-ranging non-political debates within the confines of the neutral discussion ground that is Accrington Web.

Then again, he told me in full council he wouldn't be adding me as a Facebook friend, so I'm taking me bat n ball in.

Like I've said before your now in the same boat as me:D

Ken Moss 25-01-2011 10:49

Re: Councillors expenses
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 877951)
Like I've said before your now in the same boat as me:D

Both left alone playing with our balls or spurned like someone who isn't welcome at their party? I've always been quite good at Solitaire and the thought of Conservative Blind Man's Buff conjures up all sorts of unpleasant imagery.

I'll just have to learn to live without him.

Ken Moss 25-01-2011 14:21

Re: Councillors expenses
 
I was in a meeting up at Scaitcliffe this lunchtime and butties were provided.

Now whilst I wouldn't knock the quality of what was on offer, I would question whether we really needed them. I wasn't particularly hungry but I felt compelled to indulge because they were there.

In all seriousness I think we should knock them on the head and save a few thousand quid a year.

katex 25-01-2011 15:15

Re: Councillors expenses
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ken Moss (Post 877986)
I was in a meeting up at Scaitcliffe this lunchtime and butties were provided.

Now whilst I wouldn't knock the quality of what was on offer, I would question whether we really needed them. I wasn't particularly hungry but I felt compelled to indulge because they were there.

In all seriousness I think we should knock them on the head and save a few thousand quid a year.

Can't say I entirely agree with you Ken ... some councillors may have had to use their lunch time break at work to attend this meeting and, again, would only suit the better off councillors who have the luxury of not having to worry about this. Besides, wouldn't want yer blood sugars dropping .. addles the brain... :D

garinda 25-01-2011 15:18

Re: Councillors expenses
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ken Moss (Post 877986)
I was in a meeting up at Scaitcliffe this lunchtime and butties were provided.

Now whilst I wouldn't knock the quality of what was on offer, I would question whether we really needed them. I wasn't particularly hungry but I felt compelled to indulge because they were there.

In all seriousness I think we should knock them on the head and save a few thousand quid a year.

Who does the catering?

I know Hearn's did quite a bit for the council.

Though that was before the recent electon in Baxenden, won by the new Cllr. Hearn.

Ken Moss 25-01-2011 15:21

Re: Councillors expenses
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by katex (Post 877990)
Can't say I entirely agree with you Ken ... some councillors may have had to use their lunch time break at work to attend this meeting and, again, would only suit the better off councillors who have the luxury of not having to worry about this. Besides, wouldn't want yer blood sugars dropping .. addles the brain... :D

Sort of, but I class myself as one of the less better off councillors and it has been of no hardship to me to make a packed lunch in a morning when I know I will be working away from home that day. It might sound like a really small thing but if the council tightens up on bills of a few thousand here and there we're moving in the right direction to avoiding laying people off.

Ken Moss 25-01-2011 15:27

Re: Councillors expenses
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 877991)
Who does the catering?

I know Hearn's did quite a bit for the council.

Though that was before the recent electon in Baxenden, won by the new Cllr. Hearn.

Yes, Cllr Hurn does the catering. Not entirely sure of the ethics of that but it's a small point.

My own waistline, much like council spending, is in need of trimming so that's another reason.

garinda 25-01-2011 15:37

Re: Councillors expenses
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ken Moss (Post 877994)
Yes, Cllr Hurn does the catering. Not entirely sure of the ethics of that but it's a small point.

My own waistline, much like council spending, is in need of trimming so that's another reason.

Smells a bit fishy.

Not good, when it's eggy cress butties.

:eek:

katex 25-01-2011 15:39

Re: Councillors expenses
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ken Moss (Post 877992)
Sort of, but I class myself as one of the less better off councillors and it has been of no hardship to me to make a packed lunch in a morning when I know I will be working away from home that day. It might sound like a really small thing but if the council tightens up on bills of a few thousand here and there we're moving in the right direction to avoiding laying people off.

But you work for yourself, do you not ?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ken Moss (Post 877994)
My own waistline, much like council spending, is in need of trimming so that's another reason.

Just because you may have overindulged in the past, does not mean that all Councillors feel the need to do this ... :p

Ken Moss 25-01-2011 15:40

Re: Councillors expenses
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 877999)
Smells a bit fishy.

Not good, when it's eggy cress butties.

:eek:

None of those today, a very suspect omission from the sandwich repertoire.

No corned dog either.

Or Spam.

The good old traditions of this mill town are being allowed to die by a corrupt council.

garinda 25-01-2011 15:50

Re: Councillors expenses
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ken Moss (Post 878001)
None of those today, a very suspect omission from the sandwich repertoire.

No corned dog either.

Or Spam.

The good old traditions of this mill town are being allowed to die by a corrupt council.


Is the catering at HBC contracted out, and if so, for how long?

Not saying anything's amiss. Just seems a bit odd that it's being done by a firm with close family ties to a councillor.

I remember a while ago some bigwig banging on about HBC striving to be a Fair Trade council.

Are your biccies and brews still Fair Trade?

Handpicked, by smiling and happy piccanninies?

Savings could be made there.

Ken Moss 25-01-2011 15:53

Re: Councillors expenses
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by katex (Post 878000)
But you work for yourself, do you not ?

Yes I do, but on the days where I'm out landscaping I leave the house at around 8am so a packed lunch is a pre-requisite. On the days where I am editing it isn't so awkward but we're still getting a free lunch and there aren't many places that do that.

Quote:

Just because you may have overindulged in the past, does not mean that all Councillors feel the need to do this ... :p
Then we must think of the staff who live in fear of the chop.....

Ken Moss 25-01-2011 15:54

Re: Councillors expenses
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 878004)
Is the catering at HBC contracted out, and if so, for how long?

Not saying anything's amiss. Just seems a bit odd that it's being done by a firm with close family ties to a councillor.

I remember a while ago some bigwig banging on about HBC striving to be a Fair Trade council.

Are your biccies and brews still Fair Trade?

Handpicked, by smiling and happy piccanninies?

Savings could be made there.

Don't know about that. I've certainly not had biccies at any meeting while I've been a councillor although I did suggest some time ago that miniscule subs for tea and coffee wouldn't go amiss.

We have actually had a Fairtrade report not long ago and the council does qualify.

garinda 25-01-2011 16:03

Re: Councillors expenses
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ken Moss (Post 878007)
We have actually had a Fairtrade report not long ago and the council does qualify.

'Hyndburn is currently trying to achieve Fairtrade status and residents of Hyndburn are being asked to buy at least one item of Fairtrade goods each week to support this.'

http://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f...ght-20196.html

Perhaps we should start a scheme in which people are encouraged to buy at least one item from a town centre shop, or market stall, and freely support their trade, before they've all gone.

claytonender 25-01-2011 17:16

Re: Councillors expenses
 
I was at the same meeting as Ken, but I had already eaten my sandwiches (a chicken teacake - made at home) before I went into the meeting. I really can't se any reason why HBC should be providing food for councillors at lunchtime, even if they have been in an earlier meeting. When I was working I either took a homemade sandwich to work or bought one.

garinda 25-01-2011 17:22

Re: Councillors expenses
 
Let's just hope that if it is decided that there's a conflict of interests, and Cllr. Hurn's given the push, they don't get Aldo Zilli in to make their butties.

:eek:

jaysay 25-01-2011 17:34

Re: Councillors expenses
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ken Moss (Post 877954)
Both left alone playing with our balls or spurned like someone who isn't welcome at their party? I've always been quite good at Solitaire and the thought of Conservative Blind Man's Buff conjures up all sorts of unpleasant imagery.

I'll just have to learn to live without him.

I'm sure that will be the hardest task you've ever taken on:D:D

jaysay 25-01-2011 17:37

Re: Councillors expenses
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by katex (Post 877990)
Can't say I entirely agree with you Ken ... some councillors may have had to use their lunch time break at work to attend this meeting and, again, would only suit the better off councillors who have the luxury of not having to worry about this. Besides, wouldn't want yer blood sugars dropping .. addles the brain... :D

First of all Kate what brain:Dbut seriously, I know a councillor (not PB) who has regularly left home at 9-30am and not returned home until after 9pm.

jaysay 25-01-2011 17:39

Re: Councillors expenses
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 877999)
Smells a bit fishy.

Not good, when it's eggy cress butties.

:eek:

No more fishy than Doltons doing printing for HBC;)

MargaretR 25-01-2011 17:41

Re: Councillors expenses
 
Hang on a minute ....I understood that PB has connections to some town centre cafe where he will likely get fed free.

jaysay 25-01-2011 18:08

Re: Councillors expenses
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MargaretR (Post 878043)
Hang on a minute ....I understood that PB has connections to some town centre cafe where he will likely get fed free.

Oh come on Margaret you don't expect Peter to walk from Scaitcliffe house to the Market Hall just for lunch, who the hell would hold the fort whilst he was away;) :D

Ken Moss 25-01-2011 18:41

Re: Councillors expenses
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 878042)
No more fishy than Doltons doing printing for HBC;)

I wondered when that little nugget would get another showing. Printing council literature is pretty much a necessity, someone has to do it so why not a local firm? Butties, on the other hand, are a luxury.

If I was on £31k+ per year I think I'd just about be able to treat myself. I get £4,500 for being a councillor and even I don't consider it a loss of anemity or any of that 'against human rights' guff.

Free sandwiches? Ta ta.

gynn 25-01-2011 20:02

Re: Councillors expenses
 
The contract for providing lunches at Scaitcliffe House is, under the Council's constitution, deemed to be a small contract, and as such will effectively fly under the radar in terms of requiring competitive tenders to be sought. To retain the Council's "Excellent" status, the external auditors will only look for evidence of similar providers giving similar value for money.

I assume that no other providers can do the job, because no "Excellent" council would go anywhere near allowing a serving member of the controlling group to profit personally from providing the refreshments for unbiased meetings, would they?

katex 25-01-2011 21:26

Re: Councillors expenses
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ken Moss (Post 878006)

Then we must think of the staff who live in fear of the chop.....

Can't believe you said this, Ken. Whilst I agree with your 'policy' of searching out smaller spendings to relieve the budget ... holding this up as a guilt trip to staff at HBC losing their jobs is dirty tactics. Not impressed.

As for solvent councillors not claiming the expenses they are entitled to, and which would ease some lesser well off councillor's income so that they can carry out their duties without the pressure of expense, I have no time for this smug martyrdom.

I stand by my original post.

Ken Moss 26-01-2011 06:25

Re: Councillors expenses
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by katex (Post 878129)
Can't believe you said this, Ken. Whilst I agree with your 'policy' of searching out smaller spendings to relieve the budget ... holding this up as a guilt trip to staff at HBC losing their jobs is dirty tactics. Not impressed.

As for solvent councillors not claiming the expenses they are entitled to, and which would ease some lesser well off councillor's income so that they can carry out their duties without the pressure of expense, I have no time for this smug martyrdom.

I stand by my original post.

I think a certain tongue-in-cheek factor is not quite coming across in my posts.

However, I'm not being entirely flippant either about whittling out spending like this so that the people who do the actual work don't get fired. I'd rather go without the odd free meal if I knew that the ward caretaker would be litter-picking that week, or the call-centre was fully staffed, or the binmen weren't trying to cram everything into even fewer shifts, etc.

I'm quite surprised you're being seemingly quite supportive of free buffets for the councillors when the rest of the borough is wondering if they'll even have a job this time next year. I have to say that walking into a meeting to find a free lunch waiting for me and then telling everyone in Rishton that cuts have to be made doesn't sit well with my conscience.

There are hundreds of other examples of small amounts being dished out for no real reason, you only need to scan The Observer to see that. Little cheques to individuals for £250 here, £500 there....nice votewinners and even nicer for the people on the receiving end but we aren't here to use public money in that way, we should be spending to improve whole communities and once you start totting up all the little things you suddenly find that you've got a big saving.

There's also the Cabinet Action Fund which has magically been increased to £100k this year and something which the Leader of the Council can spend as he sees fit. Looking back over the years I have to say that I wouldn't have parted with a lot of it and feel that it is a lot of money in the hands of one politician.

I'll say it again, we aren't here to shout about what jolly nice chaps we are, we aren't here to crow to the world about how 'excellent' we are and we shouldn't be getting perks when the rest of the borough struggles. Even the Mayor paid for his own Civic Celebrations this year!

I can appreciate that you think there's dirty tactics at play but a council can't scream about making savage cuts and ignore ways of cushioning the blow.

garinda 26-01-2011 07:18

Re: Councillors expenses
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by gynn (Post 878107)
The contract for providing lunches at Scaitcliffe House is, under the Council's constitution, deemed to be a small contract, and as such will effectively fly under the radar in terms of requiring competitive tenders to be sought. To retain the Council's "Excellent" status, the external auditors will only look for evidence of similar providers giving similar value for money.

I assume that no other providers can do the job, because no "Excellent" council would go anywhere near allowing a serving member of the controlling group to profit personally from providing the refreshments for unbiased meetings, would they?

How many lunches a year are we talking about, that deems the cost too small for it to tendered out?

Who caters for other council events, receptions etc?

Ken Moss 26-01-2011 07:42

Re: Councillors expenses
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 878178)
How many lunches a year are we talking about, that deems the cost too small for it to tendered out?

Who caters for other council events, receptions etc?

All catering seems to be done by Hurns and sets the council back between roughly £2000-£4000 per year, last year it was £4059.79.

Occasional one-off payments have also been made from the Cabinet Action Fund for special events.

garinda 26-01-2011 07:48

Re: Councillors expenses
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ken Moss (Post 878180)
All catering seems to be done by Hurns and sets the council back between roughly £2000-£4000 per year, last year it was £4059.79.

Occasional one-off payments have also been made from the Cabinet Action Fund for special events.

Not such a triffling amount to many people here in Hyndburn.

Most companies in the private sector would tender out catering for something that cost that much, to ensure they were getting value for money.

A nice 'little' earner for Cllr. Hurn.

JCB 26-01-2011 17:55

Re: Councillors expenses
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ken Moss (Post 878180)
All catering seems to be done by Hurns and sets the council back between roughly £2000-£4000 per year

Roughly £2000-£4000 .

Crikey one is double the other .

garinda 26-01-2011 18:01

Re: Councillors expenses
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by JCB (Post 878315)
Roughly £2000-£4000 .

Crikey one is double the other .

I suppose that varience could be explained by whether the King demanded the crusts be cut off his butties, or proclaimed there are juicy cherries on his buns.

Less 26-01-2011 18:12

Re: Councillors expenses
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ken Moss (Post 878180)
All catering seems to be done by Hurns and sets the council back between roughly £2000-£4000 per year, last year it was £4059.79.

Occasional one-off payments have also been made from the Cabinet Action Fund for special events.

Surely, roughly is against all you are preaching?

espescially when last year was above roughly?


Or are you giving way to inflation?

garinda 26-01-2011 18:15

Re: Councillors expenses
 
Perhaps if someone hadn't wanted to change the name of Hyndburn Borough Council, not to Accrington and Districts, blah, blah, blah, they'd chosen the name the Court of Hamalot B.C., they might have had more success.

Spamalot B.C., probably wouldn't have been seen as a palatable option, even though it would be more economically preferable.

There are obviously refined tastes to pander to, which can only be satisfied with the finest morsels.

Ken Moss 27-01-2011 06:54

Re: Councillors expenses
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Less (Post 878324)
Surely, roughly is against all you are preaching?

espescially when last year was above roughly?


Or are you giving way to inflation?

Fair point.

It has varied between about £2000-£4000 a year since 2004.

accysimon 27-01-2011 07:05

Re: Councillors expenses
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 878042)
No more fishy than Doltons doing printing for HBC;)


What is the issue of Daltons (as it should be spelt) doing printing for HBC? I know Graham Jones worked there, but he was in opposition wasn't he, so how could he have any influence over this?

accysimon 27-01-2011 07:07

Re: Councillors expenses
 
A major question here, is just how much will the Labour Group stop all these 'unfair' (allegedly) expenses if they were to come to power?

Neil 27-01-2011 07:36

Re: Councillors expenses
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by accysimon (Post 878385)
What is the issue of Daltons (as it should be spelt) doing printing for HBC? I know Graham Jones worked there, but he was in opposition wasn't he, so how could he have any influence over this?

I would think councillors have nothing to do with deciding who supplies food and printing to the council and it is done by officers.

I can't remember the exact amount but I think it is £500 where 3 quotes are needed for a spend to comply with the council tendering rules.

They might class each lunch as a separate spend so don't need to tender for it. I would hope they did tender though as it is £4000 a year and many local firms would like a nice regular contract like that so would be competitive.

Ken Moss 27-01-2011 08:07

Re: Councillors expenses
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by accysimon (Post 878386)
A major question here, is just how much will the Labour Group stop all these 'unfair' (allegedly) expenses if they were to come to power?

They will be reduced by quite a lot, Simon.

A few of us have been going through the figures in detail and we spend a shocking amount on individual expenses, many of which cannot be justified as they stand. The system needs reforming to reduce spending across the board and get better value for money in areas that are a little lax.

Most reforms take around a year to kick in but cutting throwaway cheques can be done overnight.

jaysay 27-01-2011 08:11

Re: Councillors expenses
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ken Moss (Post 878399)
They will be reduced by quite a lot, Simon.

A few of us have been going through the figures in detail and we spend a shocking amount on individual expenses, many of which cannot be justified as they stand. The system needs reforming to reduce spending across the board and get better value for money in areas that are a little lax.

Most reforms take around a year to kick in but cutting throwaway cheques can be done overnight.

I wait with bated breathe Kenny old chap:D

Bernard Dawson 27-01-2011 08:42

Re: Councillors expenses
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by accysimon (Post 878386)
A major question here, is just how much will the Labour Group stop all these 'unfair' (allegedly) expenses if they were to come to power?

We need a major overall of the expenses system. The Council just can't afford the amount of expenses we pay at the present. We pay far more in Councillors expenses that many Councils of a similar size.

garinda 27-01-2011 09:37

Re: Councillors expenses
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Neil (Post 878391)
I would think councillors have nothing to do with deciding who supplies food and printing to the council and it is done by officers.

Can anyone confirm that this is so?

Neil 27-01-2011 10:27

Re: Councillors expenses
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 878431)
Can anyone confirm that this is so?

I would like to know as well, Councillors must be to busy to worry where the food comes from, they must be. Well I hope they are

jaysay 27-01-2011 10:34

Re: Councillors expenses
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Neil (Post 878435)
I would like to know as well, Councillors must be to busy to worry where the food comes from, they must be. Well I hope they are

Well it is a full time job for some of them Neil, especially if they pack their day job in because they say its interfering with their political work:rolleyes:

Less 27-01-2011 10:53

Re: Councillors expenses
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Neil (Post 878435)
I would like to know as well, Councillors must be to busy to worry where the food comes from, they must be. Well I hope they are

There's one Councillor on here that isn't too busy to worry about where the food comes from, maybe there should be a few more Councillors that could take time out and see if there is waste or extravagence that they can insist is curbed?
:)

Another couple of thoughts about the sandwiches? Are there always enough? Are there regularly too many and if so, what happens to the extras?

In other words, does someone from the contracted company nip around before hand taking a buttie order, or is there always a massive spread paid for automatically just in case all the scroungers, erm sorry I meant Councillors turn up at once for a free lunch?

Does our glorious leader use his medal ribbon as a bib?

;)

Ken Moss 27-01-2011 12:24

Re: Councillors expenses
 
There are always more than enough sandwiches to go around and I think the staff snaffle up the ones that are left. Fair enough really, they clean up the plates and make sure we have a flask of hot water ready for our brews.

gynn 27-01-2011 12:37

Re: Councillors expenses
 
I can answer those questions.

1. The choice of supplier for a contract this size is an officer responsibility. Members would have no part to play. The relevant part of the Council's constitution says:-

5.1 This procedure applies to contracts where the estimated value of works, goods and services to be supplied is less than £10 000;

5.2 The relevant Chief Officer must be satisfied that the procedure adopted secures the best value for money for the Council and where practicable at least two quotations should be obtained. E-mailed quotations are acceptable but a copy of each quotation received must be retained on file.

I'm sure the relevant quotations will be available on file to any member who wishes to ask.

2. If there are any sandwiches left over after the meetings, a general call goes out across Scaitcliffe House and the sandwiches aren't left uneaten for long.

Less 27-01-2011 13:43

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ken Moss (Post 878454)
There are always more than enough sandwiches to go around and I think the staff snaffle up the ones that are left. Fair enough really, they clean up the plates and make sure we have a flask of hot water ready for our brews.

Quote:

2. If there are any sandwiches left over after the meetings, a general call goes out across Scaitcliffe House and the sandwiches aren't left uneaten for long.
Isn't that similar to stealing Biro's?
(only kidding, better they get the leftovers than such things go to waste, after all by the time the hard working menials get to go home they'll have digested them so the butties won't leave the premises).

Tealeaf 27-01-2011 16:01

Re: Councillors expenses
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ken Moss (Post 878454)
There are always more than enough sandwiches to go around and I think the staff snaffle up the ones that are left...

I can understand if occasionally, there are surplus sandwiches.....but '..always more than enough'? Surely this suggests the council is paying more than it should for its catering services? And what the hell are the staff doing scoffing the leftovers? Should they not be at their work stations, doing the job the ratepayer pays them to do? Or are some of them surplus as well?

Less 27-01-2011 16:13

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tealeaf (Post 878474)
I can understand if occasionally, there are surplus sandwiches.....but '..always more than enough'? Surely this suggests the council is paying more than it should for its catering services? And what the hell are the staff doing scoffing the leftovers? Should they not be at their work stations, doing the job the ratepayer pays them to do? Or are some of them surplus as well?

I think I put it a little more gently, I wouldn't want to make it seem that every day around 2 o'clock there is a bun fight between the highly paid executives & those of lower status rushing to the executive dining area, all doffing their caps & thanking the high and mighty for the crumbs from their table.

Surely the common workers will prove themselves above such charity...

garinda 27-01-2011 16:14

Re: Councillors expenses
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by gynn (Post 878456)
5.1 This procedure applies to contracts where the estimated value of works, goods and services to be supplied is less than £10 000;

5.2 The relevant Chief Officer must be satisfied that the procedure adopted secures the best value for money for the Council and where practicable at least two quotations should be obtained. E-mailed quotations are acceptable but a copy of each quotation received must be retained on file.

Still rather confusing.
Will quotes have been obtained, even though the annual cost is less than £10,000.?

Quote:

Originally Posted by gynn (Post 878107)
The contract for providing lunches at Scaitcliffe House is, under the Council's constitution, deemed to be a small contract, and as such will effectively fly under the radar in terms of requiring competitive tenders to be sought.

As stated earlier, I'm sure there's nothing amiss, even though we now have a councillor with close ties to the firm contracted to do the catering.

garinda 27-01-2011 16:34

Re: Councillors expenses
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by gynn (Post 869086)
Quote:Originally Posted by Ken Moss http://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/s...s/viewpost.gif
'...it hardly seems proper that the business in question is run by a Baxenden councillor. We've spent over £15,000 on buffets in the past five years to that business.'

Does the councillor in question attend the meetings?

It brings a whole new meaning to the phrase "there's no such thing as a free lunch!"


http://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f...tml#post869086

No, (over) £15,000.00 spent on butties, certainly can't be described as 'a free lunch', by any standards.


Less 28-01-2011 04:22

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ken Moss (Post 878180)
last year it was £4059.79.

So that is about £80 per week which coincidently is similar to the amount I pay per month in Council taxes. That means the taxes from four households are needed every year to keep the fat cats, erm fat!

How many other householders taxes are tied up in similar little perks that are too trivial for us to worry about?

If however close scrutiny was kept on such payments how many jobs would be more secure when the necessary cuts have to be made?

Ken Moss 28-01-2011 06:44

Re: Councillors expenses
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Less (Post 878561)
So that is about £80 per week which coincidently is similar to the amount I pay per month in Council taxes. That means the taxes from four households are needed every year to keep the fat cats, erm fat!

How many other householders taxes are tied up in similar little perks that are too trivial for us to worry about?

If however close scrutiny was kept on such payments how many jobs would be more secure when the necessary cuts have to be made?

That is precisely my intention. I'll keep you updated.

Neil 28-01-2011 07:24

Re: Councillors expenses
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Less (Post 878561)
So that is about £80 per week which coincidently is similar to the amount I pay per month in Council taxes. That means the taxes from four households are needed every year to keep the fat cats, erm fat!


Its more than 4 households Less. Most of your Council Tax goes to LCC and the Police. If you look at your bill it shows how much of it goes to HBC.

garinda 28-01-2011 07:28

Re: Councillors expenses
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Neil (Post 878572)
Its more than 4 households Less.

Perhaps they should rename a whole Hyndburn street Butty Street.

jaysay 28-01-2011 09:14

Re: Councillors expenses
 
Looks like our Ken will be on a mission of Hearts and minds if he sits in the incharge chair come next May, think he may find things are not as black and white as he thinks they are:D

DaveinGermany 28-01-2011 09:34

Re: Councillors expenses
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 878583)
think he may find things are not as black and white as he thinks they are:D

Which is usually true in most cases, lots of things happen behind the scenes that Joe Public is unaware of. Now, If young Kenneth maintains his integrity & consistency as it appears he has on here, then maybe at least more facts will come through & people will be in a better position to judge whether or not they are being treated fairly by their elected council.

Isn't that what folk are getting so wound up about ? The fact they're not being treated openly & honesty ! A multitude of sins can be, if not forgiven at least accepted by the man on the street as long as there is proper openness & he has the truth & facts plainly & clearly in front of him !

It's the bull, lies & spin that raise the most mistrust & contempt for those in their secluded corridors of power & intrigue.

jaysay 28-01-2011 09:45

Re: Councillors expenses
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by DaveinGermany (Post 878588)
Which is usually true in most cases, lots of things happen behind the scenes that Joe Public is unaware of. Now, If young Kenneth maintains his integrity & consistency as it appears he has on here, then maybe at least more facts will come through & people will be in a better position to judge whether or not they are being treated fairly by their elected council.

Isn't that what folk are getting so wound up about ? The fact they're not being treated openly & honesty ! A multitude of sins can be, if not forgiven at least accepted by the man on the street as long as there is proper openness & he has the truth & facts plainly & clearly in front of him !

It's the bull, lies & spin that raise the most mistrust & contempt for those in their secluded corridors of power & intrigue.

The road to heaven is paved with good intentions Dave, it can also be said about the road to hell too:D

DaveinGermany 28-01-2011 09:55

Re: Councillors expenses
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 878592)
The road to heaven is paved with good intentions Dave, it can also be said about the road to hell too:D

Quite possible, but not being of a particularly religious bent roads to either don't really concern me. I'd sooner have the road I'm on right here & now properly maintained thank you very much ! ;)

jaysay 28-01-2011 10:01

Re: Councillors expenses
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by DaveinGermany (Post 878594)
Quite possible, but not being of a particularly religious bent roads to either don't really concern me. I'd sooner have the road I'm on right here & now properly maintained thank you very much ! ;)

Your better of in Germany then Dave:D

Less 28-01-2011 10:05

Re: Councillors expenses
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Neil (Post 878572)
Its more than 4 households Less. Most of your Council Tax goes to LCC and the Police. If you look at your bill it shows how much of it goes to HBC.

Yes, I do understand that Neil, but in simplistic terms If my bill = £80 p.m.
Buttie bill = £80 p.w.
Then I and 3 others are needed to cover the 'pig fest'.

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_gDqx9qASjP.../PigEating.gif

All the other £80, (£80+ in most cases I get single person allowance and I think I'm in the lowest band), Per Month pay all the other bills

shillelagh 18-05-2011 16:43

Re: Councillors expenses
 
ive rooted this back up because i was nosying thro the rossendale bc website ... and came across this .. the updated members allowances for 2011/12

http://www.rossendale.gov.uk/downloa..._2011_2012.pdf

anyway so me being nosy ... went looking for hyndburns .. and couldnt find one for this year ... the latest being dated 2009 ....

besides that tho ... seeing as this was started re the child care allowance being up to the age of 17 ... rossendales according to this is:
This Allowance may be claimed in respect of children aged 14 years or under or in respect of other dependents where there is medical or social evidence that care is required.
Payments will not be payable to a member of the Elected Member’s household. Payments will be based on receipted expenditure incurred.
The total amount of allowance which an individual Member may claim in any one year will be limited to £750.

claytonender 19-05-2011 08:36

Re: Councillors expenses
 
The Hyndburn Members Allowance Scheme is accessible at
Council Constitution


All times are GMT. The time now is 00:04.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com