![]() |
Re: Britcliffe
No no not the comfy chair.
I am not related to Cardinal Biggles......honest |
Re: Britcliffe
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
I knew it was, I am a big tease :p:D |
Re: Britcliffe
OK...but I'm sure the wording on those at Merlin are both individually different.
|
Re: Britcliffe
So does presented by mean he paid for them, out of his £40k wages? Which I for one donated to his said wages
|
Re: Britcliffe
I think you're getting there, Wallop.
|
Re: Britcliffe
A metal plaque secured by only four philips screws - ripe for the picking ;)
|
Re: Britcliffe
in my book theres a world of difference between "Donated" @ "Presented" so i must assume the generous folk of Hyndburn have footed the bill, after all there aint much left outa £40K, to buy things like that,:D:rolleyes:
|
Re: Britcliffe
1 Attachment(s)
Oh dear.
Quote:
Call me. http://magssigns.com/yahoo_site_admi...873323_std.gif :D |
Re: Britcliffe
Quote:
It says presented so there is no story. You drink with to many reporters, its rubbing off :D |
Re: Britcliffe
Quote:
|
Re: Britcliffe
It would have been a little classier if it just said Presented by the Chairman of..., and a date.
Sometimes less is so much more. Even in politics. |
Re: Britcliffe
Quote:
:rolleyes: |
Re: Britcliffe
Quote:
|
Re: Britcliffe
Quote:
|
Re: Britcliffe
Quote:
|
Re: Britcliffe
Quote:
Much more importantly is why Councillor Britcliffe thought it neccessary to spend money on a meaningless plaque, other than to satisfy his own ego trip and possibly gain a few extra votes in the process. Traditionally, park benches if provided by the council, carried no plaque. People knew it was there for a purpose and no ulterior motive was neccessary. Some benches were and are, privately sponsored, in memory of a loved one, and would carry a message such as "Here, for many years, sat Garinda and his faithful lapdog, Neil". What a shame the plaque didn't carry wording like that. |
Re: Britcliffe
Quote:
|
Re: Britcliffe
Quote:
|
Re: Britcliffe
Quote:
|
Re: Britcliffe
Quote:
As I said, I'm not at all bothered if you're a true blue tory, or anyone else for that matter. I just think it is completely ignorant to tell the electorate at any time that they have to live on a mere £38k. You are aware I take it that the Tory central office weren't enamoured with PBs presence ;) |
Re: Britcliffe
Quote:
When you've been around a little longer you'll realise I post what I actually think, and don't have the time to waste masking hidden agendas. Apparently he did regret the comment about living on £43,000.00 (not £38k), and realised it was a gross faux pas. Bad P.R. |
Re: Britcliffe
Quote:
Unless I've clear evidence to back-up what I'm saying. Unlike your good self. Who had 'a pop a the folks' of St. Andrew's ward. Wrongly labelling us all 'true blue Tories'. ;) |
Re: Britcliffe
Quote:
|
Re: Britcliffe
Quote:
|
Re: Britcliffe
Quote:
|
Re: Britcliffe
Quote:
What was more shocking was the support he had from the local Conservative party, who were hoping it'd be third time lucky, if he stood. :rolleyes::D |
Re: Britcliffe
Quote:
|
Re: Britcliffe
Quote:
Until Jaysay tells us which it is. :D |
Re: Britcliffe
Hmm there's many a throw away remark revealed the true nature of the person. :)
|
Re: Britcliffe
Quote:
On the odd occasion that a gobby newcomer, with no evidence to back-up what they're spouting, joins our happy little band, here at Accy Web. :rolleyes: |
Re: Britcliffe
I never make throw away remarks. Like you Garinda I say what I mean and mean what I say. From one gobby to another I'm sure you'll appreciate that and wouldn't have it any other way :D
|
Re: Britcliffe
Quote:
I can always produce evidence to illustrate and prove what I post. Just as I did when I quoted your 'true blue Tories', as being the reason Cllr. Britcliffe is re-elected, which is a totally incorrect, and a ludicrous suggestion. If there was an analogy to be drawn, I'm Premier League. You're jumpers for goal posts. ...and you're providing plenty of evidence for me to prove that to be true. ;) |
Re: Britcliffe
Speaking about gettings ones facts correct.
On page 5 of this topic you can clearly see that I stated: I don't think we should be too bewildered at PBs relentless hold on his ward if the majority of the constituents are true blue Tories It's ok, I accept your retraction G :D |
Re: Britcliffe
Quote:
The local scrap salvagers may have other ideas. |
Re: Britcliffe
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Where you've posted 'throw away remarks', with no evidence to stop them being just that. In conclusion, unless you supply evidence, which would make the two quotes not throw away remarks, that means you are woefully mistaken, or in the habit of saying things which aren't true. |
Re: Britcliffe
Quote:
The majority of residents, a ward not being a 'consituency', are not 'true blue Tories'. They vote for the person, in this case one with a long track record, in historically a Labour ward, rather than the political party. Twice you've wrongly posted the figure of £38,000.00 in this thread. Even after being corrected, now you've once again wrongly refered to ward residents as 'constituents. As with throw away rermarks, accuracy, when it comes to facts, is much appreciated on here. So do please make a stab at posting factually. ;) |
Re: Britcliffe
Quote:
|
Re: Britcliffe
Quote:
:rolleyes: |
Re: Britcliffe
Quote:
|
Re: Britcliffe
Quote:
:D:p:D |
Re: Britcliffe
Quote:
|
Re: Britcliffe
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
In regione caecorum rex est luscus. (In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king.) - Erasmus. :rolleyes: |
Re: Britcliffe
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 14:42. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com