Accrington Web

Accrington Web (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/index.php)
-   General Chat (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f69/)
-   -   Britcliffe (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f69/britcliffe-58480.html)

Boeing Guy 12-07-2011 19:50

Re: Britcliffe
 
No no not the comfy chair.
I am not related to Cardinal Biggles......honest

Neil 12-07-2011 19:50

Re: Britcliffe
 
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tealeaf (Post 918401)
That or words to that effect.

That's why I'm asking about the exact wording.


I knew it was, I am a big tease :p:D

Tealeaf 12-07-2011 19:58

Re: Britcliffe
 
OK...but I'm sure the wording on those at Merlin are both individually different.

wallop79 12-07-2011 20:03

Re: Britcliffe
 
So does presented by mean he paid for them, out of his £40k wages? Which I for one donated to his said wages

Tealeaf 12-07-2011 20:04

Re: Britcliffe
 
I think you're getting there, Wallop.

MargaretR 12-07-2011 20:13

Re: Britcliffe
 
A metal plaque secured by only four philips screws - ripe for the picking ;)

cashman 12-07-2011 20:58

Re: Britcliffe
 
in my book theres a world of difference between "Donated" @ "Presented" so i must assume the generous folk of Hyndburn have footed the bill, after all there aint much left outa £40K, to buy things like that,:D:rolleyes:

garinda 12-07-2011 21:13

Re: Britcliffe
 
1 Attachment(s)
Oh dear.

Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 917718)
It's just a shame he didn't have me running his P.R.

Even with reduced circumstances, I'll cut you a special rate.

Call me.

http://magssigns.com/yahoo_site_admi...873323_std.gif

:D

Neil 12-07-2011 21:48

Re: Britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tealeaf (Post 918415)
I think you're getting there, Wallop.

Getting nowhere more like. You thought it said donated so you wanted a dig.
It says presented so there is no story. You drink with to many reporters, its rubbing off :D

cashman 12-07-2011 21:53

Re: Britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Neil (Post 918470)
Getting nowhere more like. You thought it said donated so you wanted a dig.
It says presented so there is no story. You drink with to many reporters, its rubbing off :D

I reckon its fair game,having a dig at a plank that had a plaque put in the market hall saying he opened it, when i can never recall it being closed?:rolleyes:

garinda 12-07-2011 22:00

Re: Britcliffe
 
It would have been a little classier if it just said Presented by the Chairman of..., and a date.

Sometimes less is so much more.

Even in politics.

garinda 12-07-2011 22:02

Re: Britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 918476)
It would have been a little classier if it just said Presented by the Chairman of..., and a date.

Sometimes less is so much more.

Even in politics.

vainglorious - definition of vainglorious by the Free Online Dictionary, Thesaurus and Encyclopedia.

:rolleyes:

jaysay 13-07-2011 09:32

Re: Britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Neil (Post 918386)
I can half remember, its something about it being not for residents of Church to use I think, unless I read it wrong :rolleyes:

Quite right too:mosher:

jaysay 13-07-2011 09:34

Re: Britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Neil (Post 918407)
I knew it was, I am a big tease :p:D

What a lovely gesture:D

jaysay 13-07-2011 09:37

Re: Britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MargaretR (Post 918419)
A metal plaque secured by only four philips screws - ripe for the picking ;)

Na come on Margaret, who in their right mind would want to steal one of those, unless Red Ken wants a scalp for his trophy room:D

Tealeaf 13-07-2011 09:55

Re: Britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Neil (Post 918470)
Getting nowhere more like. You thought it said donated so you wanted a dig.
It says presented so there is no story. You drink with to many reporters, its rubbing off :D

It was quite simple; I could not remember the exact words and that is why I asked if anyone could post 'em on here.

Much more importantly is why Councillor Britcliffe thought it neccessary to spend money on a meaningless plaque, other than to satisfy his own ego trip and possibly gain a few extra votes in the process.

Traditionally, park benches if provided by the council, carried no plaque. People knew it was there for a purpose and no ulterior motive was neccessary. Some benches were and are, privately sponsored, in memory of a loved one, and would carry a message such as "Here, for many years, sat Garinda and his faithful lapdog, Neil". What a shame the plaque didn't carry wording like that.

garinda 13-07-2011 10:04

Re: Britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tealeaf (Post 918569)
"Here, for many years, sat Garinda and his faithful lapdog, Neil".

We decided we didn't want you bedding down on that bench, so decided against a plaque.

Neil 13-07-2011 12:59

Re: Britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 918573)
We decided we didn't want you bedding down on that bench, so decided against a plaque.

He is only jealous because he wanted me to be his lapdog but you got to me first :D:D

jaysay 13-07-2011 18:02

Re: Britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Neil (Post 918598)
He is only jealous because he wanted me to be his lapdog but you got to me first :D:D

Down Shep:D

Mikejoed 13-07-2011 23:15

Re: Britcliffe
 
Quote:

vainglorious - definition of vainglorious by the Free Online Dictionary, Thesaurus and Encyclopedia.
Perhaps you are more acquainted with PB's real motives behind his office than you would have us believe G. Or is it just that you enjoy having a personal pop at folks :confused:

As I said, I'm not at all bothered if you're a true blue tory, or anyone else for that matter. I just think it is completely ignorant to tell the electorate at any time that they have to live on a mere £38k. You are aware I take it that the Tory central office weren't enamoured with PBs presence ;)

garinda 13-07-2011 23:28

Re: Britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mikejoed (Post 918750)
Perhaps you are more acquainted with PB's real motives behind his office than you would have us believe G. Or is it just that you enjoy having a personal pop at folks :confused:

As I said, I'm not at all bothered if you're a true blue tory, or anyone else for that matter. I just think it is completely ignorant to tell the electorate at any time that they have to live on a mere £38k. You are aware I take it that the Tory central office weren't enamoured with PBs presence ;)

Than I 'would have you believe'?

When you've been around a little longer you'll realise I post what I actually think, and don't have the time to waste masking hidden agendas.

Apparently he did regret the comment about living on £43,000.00 (not £38k), and realised it was a gross faux pas.

Bad P.R.

garinda 13-07-2011 23:46

Re: Britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mikejoed (Post 918750)
Or is it just that you enjoy having a personal pop at folks

Nor am I in the habit of doing that.

Unless I've clear evidence to back-up what I'm saying.

Unlike your good self.

Who had 'a pop a the folks' of St. Andrew's ward.

Wrongly labelling us all 'true blue Tories'.

;)

jaysay 14-07-2011 08:46

Re: Britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 918755)
Than I 'would have you believe'?

When you've been around a little longer you'll realise I post what I actually think, and don't have the time to waste masking hidden agendas.

Apparently he did regret the comment about living on £43,000.00 (not £38k), and realised it was a gross faux pas.

Bad P.R.

It certainly was a tongue in check remark, which I'm sure everybody makes from time to time, but I did actually inform him that unfortunately when your in the public eye you can't make statements like that tongue in check or not, you cannot unsay something you've said

jaysay 14-07-2011 08:50

Re: Britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 918757)
Nor am I in the habit of doing that.

Unless I've clear evidence to back-up what I'm saying.

Unlike your good self.

Who had 'a pop a the folks' of St. Andrew's ward.

Wrongly labelling us all 'true blue Tories'.

;)

Saint Andrews ward of old which in the days of the old Ossy UDC was foxhill bank ward which was a safe Labour seat until 1966, the Tories hadn't won it since the war, but along came a gentleman called Kenneth Joseph Hargreaves who changed all that

cashman 14-07-2011 09:22

Re: Britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 918781)
It certainly was a tongue in check remark, which I'm sure everybody makes from time to time, but I did actually inform him that unfortunately when your in the public eye you can't make statements like that tongue in check or not, you cannot unsay something you've said

I can accept it may well have been a "Throw Away Remark" but what i find hard to accept is, the fact this guy thought he was competent enough to represent Hyndburn as M.P. when remarks such as that clearly demonstrate he aint the "Brightest Lamp on the Street" thankfully head office seemed to have that fact sussed.:eek:

garinda 14-07-2011 09:57

Re: Britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by cashman (Post 918797)
the fact this guy thought he was competent enough to represent Hyndburn as M.P.


What was more shocking was the support he had from the local Conservative party, who were hoping it'd be third time lucky, if he stood.

:rolleyes::D

cashman 14-07-2011 10:02

Re: Britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 918803)
What was more shocking was the support he had from the local Conservative party, who were hoping it'd be third time lucky, if he stood.

:rolleyes::D

Perhaps they are easily intimidated? hard to comprehend that there all as stupid?:confused:

garinda 14-07-2011 10:14

Re: Britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by cashman (Post 918804)
Perhaps they are easily intimidated? hard to comprehend that there all as stupid?:confused:

We'll have to wait.

Until Jaysay tells us which it is.

:D

Mikejoed 14-07-2011 13:55

Re: Britcliffe
 
Hmm there's many a throw away remark revealed the true nature of the person. :)

garinda 14-07-2011 14:07

Re: Britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mikejoed (Post 918827)
Hmm there's many a throw away remark revealed the true nature of the person. :)

Yes, we've collectively noticed that too.

On the odd occasion that a gobby newcomer, with no evidence to back-up what they're spouting, joins our happy little band, here at Accy Web.

:rolleyes:

Mikejoed 14-07-2011 14:18

Re: Britcliffe
 
I never make throw away remarks. Like you Garinda I say what I mean and mean what I say. From one gobby to another I'm sure you'll appreciate that and wouldn't have it any other way :D

garinda 14-07-2011 14:30

Re: Britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mikejoed (Post 918833)
I never make throw away remarks. Like you Garinda I say what I mean and mean what I say. From one gobby to another I'm sure you'll appreciate that and wouldn't have it any other way :D

Don't even try and make some comparison with myself.

I can always produce evidence to illustrate and prove what I post.

Just as I did when I quoted your 'true blue Tories', as being the reason Cllr. Britcliffe is re-elected, which is a totally incorrect, and a ludicrous suggestion.

If there was an analogy to be drawn, I'm Premier League.

You're jumpers for goal posts.

...and you're providing plenty of evidence for me to prove that to be true.

;)

Mikejoed 14-07-2011 14:46

Re: Britcliffe
 
Speaking about gettings ones facts correct.

On page 5 of this topic you can clearly see that I stated: I don't think we should be too bewildered at PBs relentless hold on his ward if the majority of the constituents are true blue Tories

It's ok, I accept your retraction G :D

Ken Moss 14-07-2011 14:59

Re: Britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 918564)
Na come on Margaret, who in their right mind would want to steal one of those, unless Red Ken wants a scalp for his trophy room:D

The trophy room at Rishton Towers is a little bare but I'm not sure a plaque estolling the virtuous nature of Peter Britcliffe would cheer up any unregarded corner of my residence so I'll leave it be for now.

The local scrap salvagers may have other ideas.

garinda 14-07-2011 15:02

Re: Britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mikejoed (Post 918833)
I never make throw away remarks.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mikejoed (Post 918257)
the majority of the constituents are true blue Tories.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mikejoed (Post 918750)
Perhaps you are more acquainted with PB's real motives behind his office than you would have us believe G.

Two examples you've provided, in this thread alone.

Where you've posted 'throw away remarks', with no evidence to stop them being just that.

In conclusion, unless you supply evidence, which would make the two quotes not throw away remarks, that means you are woefully mistaken, or in the habit of saying things which aren't true.

garinda 14-07-2011 15:12

Re: Britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mikejoed (Post 918837)
Speaking about gettings ones facts correct.

On page 5 of this topic you can clearly see that I stated: I don't think we should be too bewildered at PBs relentless hold on his ward if the majority of the constituents are true blue Tories

It's ok, I accept your retraction G :D

...and I posted in reply that your 'if' is wrong.

The majority of residents, a ward not being a 'consituency', are not 'true blue Tories'.

They vote for the person, in this case one with a long track record, in historically a Labour ward, rather than the political party.

Twice you've wrongly posted the figure of £38,000.00 in this thread. Even after being corrected, now you've once again wrongly refered to ward residents as 'constituents.

As with throw away rermarks, accuracy, when it comes to facts, is much appreciated on here.

So do please make a stab at posting factually.

;)

jaysay 14-07-2011 17:48

Re: Britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 918844)
...and I posted in reply that your 'if' is wrong.

The majority of residents, a ward not being a 'consituency', are not 'true blue Tories'.

They vote for the person, in this case one with a long track record, in historically a Labour ward, rather than the political party.

Twice you've wrongly posted the figure of £38,000.00 in this thread. Even after being corrected, now you've once again wrongly refered to ward residents as 'constituents.

As with throw away rermarks, accuracy, when it comes to facts, is much appreciated on here.

So do please make a stab at posting factually.

;)

Your quite right in saying that the ward isn't a Tory ward G. in the days of the old Ossy UDC when there were 5 wards most of the now St Andrews ward was then Foxhill Bank Ward a safe Labour Seat, it had been a labour seat since the war until 1966 when one Kenneth Joseph Hargreaves won the seat beating a chap called, I think, Edwin Yates, who lived on Colliers Street. followed the year after by Alex Stoneham and the year after that by Dorris Clegg, people in Oswaldtwistle vote for the person on most occasions which is the way it should be, that's the only reason PB is elected because no matter what anybody says he's don't more that his fair share for Ossy over the years, something I know you are well aware of

garinda 14-07-2011 17:53

Re: Britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 918901)
Your quite right in saying that the ward isn't a Tory ward G. in the days of the old Ossy UDC when there were 5 wards most of the now St Andrews ward was then Foxhill Bank Ward a safe Labour Seat, it had been a labour seat since the war until 1966 when one Kenneth Joseph Hargreaves won the seat beating a chap called, I think, Edwin Yates, who lived on Colliers Street. followed the year after by Alex Stoneham and the year after that by Dorris Clegg, people in Oswaldtwistle vote for the person on most occasions which is the way it should be, that's the only reason PB is elected because no matter what anybody says he's don't more that his fair share for Ossy over the years, something I know you are well aware of

Yeah, odd how Red Rindy can understand these facts, yet others can't.

:rolleyes:

jaysay 14-07-2011 17:57

Re: Britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 918904)
Yeah, odd how Red Rindy can understand these facts, yet others can't.

:rolleyes:

There's none so blind as those who don't want to see;):rolleyes:

garinda 14-07-2011 18:00

Re: Britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 918906)
There's none so blind as those who don't want to see;):rolleyes:

Blimey, has someone exchanged those old leather blinkers for some perspex ones?


:D:p:D

jaysay 14-07-2011 18:01

Re: Britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 918911)
Blimey, has someone exchanged those old leather blinkers for some perspex ones?


:D:p:D

Na there still blue:alright:

garinda 14-07-2011 18:14

Re: Britcliffe
 
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 918913)
Na there still blue:alright:



In regione caecorum rex est luscus.
(In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king.)
- Erasmus.

:rolleyes:

jaysay 14-07-2011 18:45

Re: Britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 918918)
In regione caecorum rex est luscus.
(In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king.)
- Erasmus.

:rolleyes:

Don't you swear at me, and I don't care who your mate is:D


All times are GMT. The time now is 14:42.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com