![]() |
Re: Labour's real legacy
Quote:
I agree about delaying employment, by sending people on Micky Mouse university courses. I disagree with art being taught as an academic subject. Most of our greatest artists and designers don't have degrees. |
Re: Labour's real legacy
[quote=garinda;923402
Most of our greatest artists and designers don't have degrees.[/quote] Tracey Emin does. |
Re: Labour's real legacy
Quote:
|
Re: Labour's real legacy
Quote:
There was something in one of the newspapers recently, to say that those children who aren't academically gifted should be allowed to leave school at 14 and take a job........where are these jobs that they want 14 year olds to do? I think that somewhere along the way, the work ethic has been lost. Welfare benefits are to blame for this. It is(for some people) easier to claim benefits than to go out to work. Whole families who have never worked,(and so have never paid into the system they are draining) and don't want to work, are crippling the country. It may not be PC to say this, but that is how I see it. |
Re: Labour's real legacy
Quote:
It is geared towards animation (cartoons) and illustration (of books I suppose). These skills are needed in the media and advertising industry. I don't suppose that a naturally gifted arty person would know how to produce cartoons, so the training and the degree would be useful. |
Re: Labour's real legacy
Quote:
I see study in this area as futhering a skill, or learning a craft. I don't think it's necessary for this to be studied as a academic subject. I certainly knew very talented people who were denied access to further education at the highest level, because they didn't have enough O/A-level passes to qualify for entry. The most commercially successful artist I know didn't even go to art school. He apprenticed himself to a painter straight after his O-levels. |
Re: Labour's real legacy
Regarding art, having a degree never secured me one job.
That was down to whatever talent I may have, and not a piece of paper. |
Re: Labour's real legacy
I know innumerous people who have studied for degrees in sport, or media.
None subsequently gained employment in those, or even remotely similar fields. |
Re: Labour's real legacy
Quote:
|
Re: Labour's real legacy
a lot of the time people do not want to pay the wage that a graduate would expect to get....and because they want to work and minimise their student debt, they will take any job they can get.
After all you have to live, to eat, to keep a roof over your head....and it is always easier to get a job when you are in a job. |
Re: Labour's real legacy
Quote:
|
Re: Labour's real legacy
Quote:
Why would an employer pay more just because someone is over qualified for a job? |
Re: Labour's real legacy
Quote:
|
Re: Labour's real legacy
Quote:
It could very well be the case Neil. But we are giving our youngsters the message that if they go to Uni, work hard and get a degree,it will open doors for them....and it just doesn't happen like that....... unless the degree is in a subject that the jobs market has need of. We should be advising our youngsters to look at what jobs are in the jobs market before they embark on a degree.....and to get a degree that they can see is what employers want......this is not to say, that in the three years it takes to get a degree, the jobs market won't have changed. |
Re: Labour's real legacy
Quote:
Quote:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/images/...55_640_360.jpg |
All times are GMT. The time now is 02:10. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com