![]() |
Re: Teachers...
It's been commented on before, how well educated more elderly people are.
Despite leaving school at fourteen, or younger, if you go back to our grandparents' generation. Suggesting perhaps, that a more rounded academic education was successfully packed in to a shorter time frame. |
Re: Teachers...
Quote:
Wouldnt mind being a bar tender, though. I can run a longer list than that, but it wasn't easy and no-one ever tried to kid me it would be. I didn't grow up thinking my genius hadn't been recognised or appreciated like some of the young ones are doing-that's unfair to them. |
Re: Teachers...
Quote:
Discipline was instilled & used as required by means available & allowed to the teaching staff with the backing of the parents. Disruption & insolence weren't tolerated or accepted, rules were adhered to or the consequences followed & all knew where they stood. We had winners & losers, those that worked hard usually achieved those who didn't failed, that was quite simply the way life was, if you didn't want to end up on some factory/workshop floor doing low paid labour intensive work, then you bucked your ideas up & knuckled down, it really was that simple. To strive to achieve had a purpose & rewards, but today it appears immaterial, as the state will support you so why make an effort ? |
Re: Teachers...
I was in one of the two 'thick classes', and proud of it.
|
Re: Teachers...
It's good to keep in mind that it wasn't just the school ... our parents, even in my dysfunctional set up, supported the schools and what went on in them. You didn't go home, whining that big, bad "Ben" Johnson had administered six of the very best on your ass ... well, not unless you wanted a backhander:eek: When the report card came home with Ben's infamous red lines all over it, the folks didn't blame the teachers for not stimulating their little darlings. They knew where the blame lay. They didn't complain about the teachers not doing their jobs.:alright:
|
Re: Teachers...
Quote:
That is a comment I love, as well as being in charge of 3 apprentices officialy, making sure they got through their exams, also looking after the ones that so called 'tradesmen' had given up on, I have also helped many relatives to become Electronics engineers as well, one of the things I always did was correct their spelling, not because I had to, but it made it easier for the examiner. It just happened to be that if I'm teaching them, why not make sure they have the maximum of the knowledge I have? I had a bloody good Science teacher, if my report on an experiment didn't have a decent idea of the English language he made me do it again, now it seems, putting in the extra mile isn't what a teacher will do, Quote:
:) |
Re: Teachers...
Quote:
|
Re: Teachers...
What people are saying tends to take on more significance when you read things like this :-
Teachers 'falsifying pupils' marks' to inflate school results - Telegraph |
Re: Teachers...
Quote:
|
Re: Teachers...
Quote:
|
Re: Teachers...
Quote:
Less, of course I need to be able to spell and count correctly and it is now something that the education system is picking up on after many many years of it being brushed to the side. The league tables part of my post was simply highlighting a point that as staff we are monitored, judged, and sacked if our gcse results are consistantly not up to scratch. This has caused the movement away from well rounded teaching where teachers teach what each pupil needs and wants. I do believe this is wrong and work as hard as I can to make sure that basics such as literacy and numercy are a major part of each lesson I teach. Pupils are only taught what they need to be taught to pass the exams but this is changing, as ofsted have changed again what they are looking for in a satisfactory lesson. Schools are now trying to frantically introduce better literacy and numeracy support in every lesson across the school (something which I agree should never have been pushed to the back in the first place). With regards to the post on marking, as a science teacher I am required to mark books every 6 lessons with one piece in those 6 lessons specifically targetted at literacy. Other schools have other policies and other teachers are not marking books to a good enough standard in many schools. Staff will say this is due to the volume that must be completed in those 6 lessons where as others are just lazy. Again at another school I have worked at I have seen a member of staff sacked for failing to mark correctly. |
Re: Teachers...
Quote:
Also I forgot to say about value added. Its just a points system for schools which identifies how much pupils have achieved above their predicted grades. If little Tommy starts school and is predicted a D in his Science gcse when he leaves and I manage to get him a C then this is good for the value added score. Scores over 1000 show schools who are getting better results than expected for their pupils. |
Re: Teachers...
Quote:
|
Re: Teachers...
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 02:16. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com