![]() |
Re: It's not so smart to have a 'smart meter'
Margaret P, I am not saying anything like the above which I suspect you already know.
I'm all for freedom of choice based on facts. Have a smart meter, don't have a smart meter your choice, what I can't stand however are the ones (of which I know you aren't one) that come on site and spread unproven conspiracy in some strange attempt to dissuade/frighten others from using them. I realise you were trying to spread oil on stormy water, my water doesn't need it there isn't a ripple on my little pond caused by these rumour mongers. I will continue to use and work with what I know to be safe no matter how desperate they are to be proved right. |
Re: It's not so smart to have a 'smart meter'
oh dash......'sussed' again.
Yes you are right......and I know there will be no qualms for you as you work in the field of electronics and understand it far better than many of us.....however, as time goes by we learn things about humans and how things affect us......we still know pretty little about how the human brain works(!).......and what i was trying to put over(and seemingly failing) was that some things which cause no harm to some humans, may have the potentiall to affect others......in spite of what 'experts' tell us. We have to let others make a choice about what they believe...and in essence you are agreeing with that.......but a healthy dose of scepticism does no harm. Whatever others say, I think that most of us make our own minds up about things. |
Re: Re: It's not so smart to have a 'smart meter'
Quote:
A smart meter is just that, similar devices doing different tasks are in use in just about every working environment in the world, people aren't dying because of it because the dangerous stuff is kept well away from unqualified people because they don't need it. I'm not in need of a smart meter, I think it's over use of the technology, but if someone calls to fit one I won't give a monkies, however I see no need to spread stupid rumours about it being bad for my health, because it isn't. |
Re: It's not so smart to have a 'smart meter'
Quote:
The only way to escape these "threats to health/life" is to remain inside a Faraday Cage and have no electricity whatsoever inside that cage. What a life that would be:rolleyes: |
Re: It's not so smart to have a 'smart meter'
Quote:
|
Re: Re: It's not so smart to have a 'smart meter'
Quote:
|
Re: Re: It's not so smart to have a 'smart meter'
Quote:
|
Re: It's not so smart to have a 'smart meter'
Quote:
|
Re: It's not so smart to have a 'smart meter'
i cant get my head around these smart meters im way too busy trying to get my soul back out of the camera that stole it
|
Re: It's not so smart to have a 'smart meter'
Quote:
As regards hacking a wireless signal to assess occupancy, it would never work in my house. The only time consumption is low is when I'm home alone, and I've turned off the lights, TVs and computer gear off that the kids left on when they exited the house. As regards the health hazards of wireless links, once you accept that wireless data comms are there for convenience, all arguments (for and against) get diluted. We do a lot of stuff that generates unnecessary risk to our health, but we put up with it for convenience. We drive* instead of walking. We microwave processed food instead of cooking it fresh. We use insecticide instead of cultivating bug predators. Almost everything we do has a risk factor involved, and we consciously or subconsciously calculate the "return" on that risk. I'd suggest to the people that are getting upset about the health effects of the miniscule radiation from smart meters should probably consider the health benefits to vulnerable people who no longer have to allow meter readers access to their home, specifically the fake ones with ulterior motives. * You can't win with this one: I sometimes walk instead of driving, as it's inconvenient to get the car out, and just walking to Tesco generates risk. |
Re: It's not so smart to have a 'smart meter'
A interesting read for anyone who is interested in the exposure to wireless radiation.
Telecom Company?s Patent Admits: Non-Thermal Exposures To Wireless Radiation Is ?Genotoxic?, Causes ?Clear Damage to Hereditary Material? « Stop Smart Meters! (UK) |
Re: It's not so smart to have a 'smart meter'
Quote:
Of course you did. :rolleyes: |
Re: It's not so smart to have a 'smart meter'
Quote:
http://www.mcs-aware.org/images/reso...ining%20ES.pdf - a medical practitioner with no vested interest other than the health of his patients |
Re: It's not so smart to have a 'smart meter'
Quote:
Based upon our nation’s experience with other industries like "tobacco and asbestos", the Wireless Industry will likely delay taking action to reduce harm until it is faced with product liability settlements. Unfortunately, it may take a while before such cases are successful since the Industry has co-opted many scientists, and the scientific literature has mixed findings that enable industry experts to confuse the courts ;) |
Re: Re: It's not so smart to have a 'smart meter'
Quote:
The only death reported in the link was after a nurse mistakenly heated blood for a transfusion in the oven. Hardly the microwaves fault if it's used incorrectly is it? All electronic devices can be used incorrectly and if repaired incorrectly by a non competent person can become lethal. Cowboys, even cowboy posters should be treated with disdain. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 03:01. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com