![]() |
Re: Wo closed the "Sorry People" Thread, and why?
Quote:
|
Re: Wo closed the "Sorry People" Thread, and why?
The reason was apparently given to Princesshales in PM (being that the rest of us didn't like text talk or words to that effect but we were happily posting in the thread weren't we and I enjoyed that very interesting quote from Jack Winter.)
|
Re: Wo closed the "Sorry People" Thread, and why?
Quote:
|
Re: Wo closed the "Sorry People" Thread, and why?
BBK what are you up to, closing threads before the debate is over and deleting posts.
|
Re: Wo closed the "Sorry People" Thread, and why?
It makes JohnW's reply to her look a bit silly too now doesn't it?
|
Re: Wo closed the "Sorry People" Thread, and why?
Quote:
|
Re: Wo closed the "Sorry People" Thread, and why?
Never come across him/her before, perhaps an intro from BBK is in order as he obviously has "the power!"
|
Re: Wo closed the "Sorry People" Thread, and why?
Quote:
|
Re: Wo closed the "Sorry People" Thread, and why?
I'm sorry to have entered this debate so late on. Having read peoples thoughts and musings on this thread and certain others where the mercury rises, what I would like to see is a system implemented whereby karma cannot be given or subtracted, without the benefactor making themselves known to the recipient; also a reason for the karma transaction should be included. This system would allow people to know the reasons why karma has been issued or detracted, and would preclude the forum degenerating into a squabble and negate a verbal 'night of the long knives'. All I'm asking is for people to stand up and be accountable for their karma convictions, instead of this perceived sniping, in certain instances.
I would also like to see the ability to 'ghost' and be online incognito removed. Do people have something to hide? It is unfair if moderators are online and silent running, in invisible mode, and pulling the plug on posts and sometimes even whole threads, then sitting back leaving the other mods' to cop the flack. A little bit of honesty and integrity would pay dividends in the form of trust and respect. What do other Accywebbers feel? Let's have an open and healthy debate, where everyone's opinion is respected, even if it is the polar opposite of your own. Ok folks... no more Mr Angry impressions from me tonight. http://www.luxweb.co.uk/~accringt/fo...lies/smile.gif PS. Has anyone found a Dummy, Rattle & Teddy Bear lying round? I seem to have mislaid them. http://www.luxweb.co.uk/~accringt/fo...es/redface.gif http://www.luxweb.co.uk/~accringt/fo...es/biggrin.gif |
Re: Wo closed the "Sorry People" Thread, and why?
I found a teddy bear at the bottom of the stairs this morning.
On the subject of Karma, mine has behaved oddly just recently. The other day I lost one, went down to 33, then received one so went back up to 34. Now when I look in my profile all record of the one I lost has disappeared and yet my total remains at 34. How can that be I wonder? BTW I don't get angry - I just get curious. |
Re: Wo closed the "Sorry People" Thread, and why?
Quote:
Sorry Roy. I love the Accy web, but until you make every member EVEN, Members will not be happy! PLEASE be impartial to family/friends and listen to your faithful members:D |
Re: Wo closed the "Sorry People" Thread, and why?
Quote:
My assumption in this case is that Mr Angry could well have been a silent moderator, without actually anouncing it to the hoi-polloi. Maybe this could have given him the ability to find out your e-mail address.... just a thought, a theory, perhaps. :confused: The resultant ambush of your e-mail inbox doesn't surprise me in the slightest though. :( |
Re: Wo closed the "Sorry People" Thread, and why?
Quote:
|
Re: Wo closed the "Sorry People" Thread, and why?
Quote:
Returning to the initial posting. Tealeaf also asked...and nobody has yet answered. Have we a moderator or not? Could He/she please answer my question? Or do I see dark forces at work? |
Re: Wo closed the "Sorry People" Thread, and why?
Quote:
I'm all for open and healthy debate and would hope that mature adults could agree to disagree with each other without having to resort to petty insults and unfounded accusations never mind the karma snitching. I may not agree with some people's opinion on some points but I would still defend their right to have that opinion. I agree that more openness and honesty would lead to greater trust and respect. I've only ever had one minor "humph" and that was when a post of mine was deleted for saying more than a basic "hello" to a new member in an intro thread yet other threads in that same forum contain conversations about different subjects relating to the initial posting by the "newbie". Can there really be any valid reason to delete a post apart from offensive content? (I've even seen posts with offensive content which have remained in situ, the reason being given that someone has replied to them! Perhaps what we really need is a bit of consistency.) OK, Sparky that's my input into the debate. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 22:03. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com