have the yanks got this one right?
Driver Made To Wear Idiot Sign As Punishment
she was caught repeatedley driving on the pavement to get around a school bus, so has been ordered to stand on the corner of the street weraring a sign "only an idiot would drive on the pavement" i am sure we would never impose this here, a breech of human rights no doubt i sometimes think that punishments like this would serve the public better than 3 points and a fixed penalty. we could never get away with it whilst we are shackled to our eu masters in strasbourg/brussels. but isnt this just a 21 century "sentanced to the stocks", and if so do you believe it to be good or not i would support something like this, whole heartedley. imagine shoplifters ordered to stand outside the shop wearing a sign, a drunk and disorderly outside the pub on a saturday night. its not often i doth my cap to the colonies, but this is one of em! |
Re: have the yanks got this one right?
Yes i think they have.
Have you heard of Sheriff Joe? About:Sheriff Joseph M. Arpaio This is a man who makes inmates wear pink on the chain gangs. Built a 'tent city' to house inmates, he reasoned that seeing soilders were suffering worse conditions in Iraq, then the prosoners should share somd of it. Now if we had a Sheriff Joe as a candidate for Police Commisioner, i would vote for him |
Re: have the yanks got this one right?
yes i have,
and i totally agree, from what i saw they volunteer to go on the chain gang and if they complete it without incident get a reduced sentance, you got the plane, bring him over, there is a job waiting for him! |
Re: have the yanks got this one right?
No question at all to me, the yanks have got it spot on in this instance.
|
Re: have the yanks got this one right?
Quote:
WE AGREE ON SUMMAT!!!! |
Re: have the yanks got this one right?
in the states they are not handcuffed to 'yuman rights' like we are.......so they can punish, how they see fit...and if it deters others from doing the same thing, then it works.
Over here, we have bowed to the desires and whims of the bleeding heart liberals for decades. That isn't to say that it is too late to change..but to change...you have to want that change enough to fight for it. |
Re: have the yanks got this one right?
i am trying to remember "the worm that turned" i think it was the two ronnies, i could be massivley wrong, but it was like an ongoing weekly sketch, that showed a very british revolution one in wish we still had a queen, but communist
sounds about right for us, always envied the french (one of the few), that go out on the streets for just about anything, the only time we get any kind of protest it turns into "a riot", and any one envolved is branded a thug, an upstart and damned by the media and society is led down the path of believing it to be wrong. the only voice we have is the ballot box, but with the majority of the public losing faith in "our democracy" i see little hope, so we will just sit here and tap out our frustrations on our keyboards police commisioner for example, all political party candidates, not one "man of the street" corrupt, corrupt from the bottom to the top, and they tell me its the law- the levellers |
Re: have the yanks got this one right?
Church...if voting really changed anything, they(the powers that be) would stop us from doing it.
Voting is just to let us think we can influence things....and also so that they can blame someone else when it all goes pear shaped....and so that there is infighting between the electorate.......divide and rule....the other thing is while we are fighting amongst ourselves 'they' can pretty much get away with anything. We are fed 'the pap of untruth, the bread of half truth' we are lied to as if we were five year olds, by politicians who have no interest in what is best for us, or for that matter the country. I really don't see it changing anytime soon....unless there is an uprising...a revolution....but everything is weighted against the peasants. |
Re: have the yanks got this one right?
Quote:
|
Re: have the yanks got this one right?
Seems like a good idea to me. Probably seems like a good idea to the majority of the British public. But even if the government wanted to introduce it, they wouldn't be allowed to because the European Court of Human Rights would put a stop to it. In other words a foreign court decides what we can and can't do in our own country.
Mainstream politicos, please come on here and justify. Sssshhhh.... :rolleyes: |
Re: have the yanks got this one right?
That is what I meant Eric...that the states have their own rules...autonomy.
I was using a bit of literary licence when I said they could punish 'as they see fit'. The punishments(or correction, if you prefer that word) seem to be more appropriate than what the judiciary are allowed to mete out here. Prison here seems a more pleasant option that some old folks nursing homes, where the incumbents are paying 600 quid a week for their 'care'. Perhaps we should be charging prisoners for their accommodation and meals. |
Re: have the yanks got this one right?
Oh, and on the subject of meals......it is interesting to note that prisoners have more money spent on their meals than do many sick people in hopsital.
|
Re: have the yanks got this one right?
Quote:
|
Re: have the yanks got this one right?
is it state law and federal law they operate on because having two sets of rules seems to be a bad idea its like having lancashire laws,yorkshire laws etc then a uk law as well to adhere to.They say one nation under god but perhaps they should try one nation under one set of law?
|
Re: have the yanks got this one right?
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 14:48. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com