Originally Posted by gpick24 (Post 1056847)

Can none celebs be named if they have been charged?

Originally Posted by cashman (Post 1056851)

I was referring to more serious stuff than shoplifting accyman, plus going back donkeys years, may well be different now, have no idea.:confused:

Originally Posted by gpick24 (Post 1056850)

Just thinking back to the claires law thread where it was discussed about releasing names of people that have only been accused. Perhaps if an accusation had got so far that they could have legally been named in the press, then they could be on the list.

Originally Posted by cashman (Post 1056855)

Yeh mean Elvis is really dead?:eek:

Originally Posted by accyman (Post 1056858)

about as dead as a dildo mate

Originally Posted by cashman (Post 1056860)

Yeh will be telling me next theres no father christmas.

Originally Posted by entwisi (Post 1056743)

He used to live at the big house at the tesco roundabout ( now a restaurant ) so I guess it happened there.

Originally Posted by accyman (Post 1056876)

len fairclough actor was supposed to have fiddled with a little girls bits in a swimming pool if i recall correctly

i think he went on GMTV pleading his innocence

was a long time ago but im pretty sure tahts about right without googleing


i also cantthink of anything the len faircough actor was in after corronation street so maybe he was blackballed by the what would have been 3 channels then

Originally Posted by accyman (Post 1056849)

i didnt think people were named in the press until appearing in court.

for example papers would say john smith of make believe lane appeared in court on the 23rd of may 2013 accused of shoplifting

dont recall them saying john smith was charged today of shoplifting and will appear in court on the 23rd of may infact with all teh charges police make it would fill teh news paper so i guess only juicey ones get to go in the press

appologies to john smith if your name is john smith lol