Accrington Web

Accrington Web (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/index.php)
-   General Chat (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f69/)
-   -   Animals killed for training (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f69/animals-killed-for-training-65821.html)

cashman 04-03-2014 15:01

Re: Animals killed for training
 
Or perhaps let out,when certain institutions closed down.:D

Less 04-03-2014 15:07

Re: Animals killed for training
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Accyexplorer (Post 1096657)
As you know,If there is one thing about reading papers it's not to believe the properganda they push.

How do you know he knows?

Clairvoyant as well as obsessive eh?



Quote:

Originally Posted by Accyexplorer (Post 1096657)
In the pics it shows the pigs mouth taped up,now Margaret suggested it maybe because of when they come round,but I think it's more to stop them biting if they don't use enough anaesthetic like in the clip I posted,which would suggest they do feel these 'procedures'.

I would put my trust in Margaret's theories long before I wasted a pinch of salt on any theory you put forward after reading your recent posts.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Accyexplorer (Post 1096657)
Perhaps I'm a new age hippy but didn't know it :)

Nope just dumb, if you weren't dumb you would know you aren't a hippy.

Gordon Booth 04-03-2014 15:18

Re: Animals killed for training
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by DtheP47 (Post 1096655)
Just read post #238 on the Death of a Woolwich Soldier.

Sensitive to the pigs death but not to its entrails being used as some primitive totem or spell Gordon.

Good memory, DtheP!

His post 231 on that thread is also the post of a sensitive, humane man.

A bit of a 'man for all seasons'.

Accyexplorer 04-03-2014 15:22

Re: Animals killed for training
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Less (Post 1096659)
How do you know he knows?

Clairvoyant as well as obsessive eh?





I would put my trust in Margaret's theories long before I wasted a pinch of salt on any theory you put forward after reading your recent posts.



Nope just dumb, if you weren't dumb you would know you aren't a hippy.

I know he knows because every other comment on Accyweb that has a link to a paper says so.
Now now less,keep a eye on the old blood pressure cock(er).

Less 04-03-2014 15:39

Re: Animals killed for training
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Accyexplorer (Post 1096661)
I know he knows because every other comment on Accyweb that has a link to a paper says so.

Allow me to correct you, (yet again), you can only assume he has read every other comment therefore you can only assume he knows, I think we can throw the above post onto the growing, Accyexplorer doesn't know what he's talking about pile.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Accyexplorer (Post 1096661)
Now now less,keep a eye on the old blood pressure cock(er).

Ah, now I know you really are hoping, that you now have the upper hand in smart arse retorts!

Nope sorry, I never even break into a sweat when allowing folk like you to show themselves up. So perhaps it's time you took a close look at your self esteem? The mask seems to be slipping.
:rofl38:

Boeing Guy 04-03-2014 15:57

Re: Animals killed for training
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Accyexplorer (Post 1096657)
As you know,If there is one thing about reading papers it's not to believe the properganda they push.

So why do you continue an argument based on a tabloid newspaper report.
You have not shown any other evidence to back up your claims.
Which means you have contradicted yourself.

Anyway, as Dave, myself and others have pointed out, just how do you train a battlefield surgeon to deal with the wounds caused by gunshot? Many of these doctors go on to work in the NHS saving lives everyday.

Have you ever took any Medication?

Accyexplorer 04-03-2014 16:01

Re: Animals killed for training
 
Oh I get it now,it's a bit like you assuming I have no life an sit at a desk all day on Accyweb.....thanks for clearing that up :rolleyes:

Also on a side note, I thought your liking of the cliques posts was acting like a creep ;)

Wynonie Harris 04-03-2014 16:08

Re: Animals killed for training
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Accyexplorer (Post 1096665)
Also on a side note, I thought your liking of the cliques posts was acting like a creep ;)

Suppose it was inevitable really that sooner or later the "C" word would crop up. The sure sign of someone whose arguments have been comprehensively debunked and who just can't admit defeat. :rolleyes:

Accyexplorer 04-03-2014 16:09

Re: Animals killed for training
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Boeing Guy (Post 1096663)
So why do you continue an argument based on a tabloid newspaper report.
You have not shown any other evidence to back up your claims.
Which means you have contradicted yourself.

Anyway, as Dave, myself and others have pointed out, just how do you train a battlefield surgeon to deal with the wounds caused by gunshot? Many of these doctors go on to work in the NHS saving lives everyday.

Have you ever took any Medication?

I thought we was having a debate,not a argument.
Of course I've had medication and I'm also aware that the testing was probably done on animals etc etc.my point is I THINK this 'behaviour' with pigs is unnecessary and if that makes me a hypocrite so be it.

Less 04-03-2014 16:09

Animals killed for training
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Wynonie Harris (Post 1096666)
Suppose it was inevitable really that sooner or later the "C" word would crop up. The sure sign of someone whose arguments have been comprehensively debunked and who just can't admit defeat. :rolleyes:


Well said have a clique point like.
:)

Less 04-03-2014 16:12

Animals killed for training
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Accyexplorer (Post 1096667)
I thought we was having a debate,not a argument.

Of course I've had medication and I'm also aware that the testing was probably done on animals etc etc.my point is I THINK this 'behaviour' with pigs is unnecessary and if that makes me a hypocrite so be it.


Progress?

Perhaps?

Now if we can just maybe persuade you that killing pigs is preferable to killing squaddies?

Gordon Booth 04-03-2014 16:14

Re: Animals killed for training
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Accyexplorer (Post 1096665)
Oh I get it now,it's a bit like you assuming I have no life an sit at a desk all day on Accyweb.....thanks for clearing that up :rolleyes:

Well, 18 posts so far today and it's only 17:14.

I'm retired and I haven't that much spare time!

Less 04-03-2014 16:15

Animals killed for training
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gordon Booth (Post 1096670)
Well, 18 posts so far today and it's only 17:14.

I'm retired and I haven't that much spare time!


I have, but then, I know I'm sad, some come on unable to admit it.
:)

Gordon Booth 04-03-2014 16:22

Re: Animals killed for training
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Less (Post 1096671)
I have, but then, I know I'm sad, some come on unable to admit it.
:)

Posts per day- Less 2.99. Accyexplorer 7.71 !

Less 04-03-2014 16:25

Animals killed for training
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gordon Booth (Post 1096673)
Posts per day- Less 2.99. Accyexplorer 7.71 !


Yes, I know, I'll start posting more when I get used to the site and find out if the members are friendly.

DaveinGermany 04-03-2014 18:59

Re: Animals killed for training
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Accyexplorer (Post 1096615)
I can assure you I have both family and close friends in the army.

Then surely you'd want them to get the best treatment possible if they become a battlefield casualty & if the Military say this is how they can get the most realistic practical experience, surely you should, if not support it, at least accept it.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Accyexplorer (Post 1096622)
Why is it only military medics are trained in this 'controversial' way,why not teach all our docs if it helps save life's?

Because the incidence of gunshot wounds & blast injuries within the civil medical profession is very limited.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Accyexplorer (Post 1096636)
Can these medics not do their "tests" on say test tube meat or something though it's 2014 not 1950s.
Surely with all our medical technology there are alternatives to live pigs.

You answer your own complaint, meat is just that, meat. The response & actions of a piece of meat is incomparable to a living functioning body. To understand how a body reacts to various traumas & wounds (from combat injuries) a living organism has to be used & as a pig has the misfortune to be anatomically so near to a human this makes the pig the ideal test subject.

A reliance on synthetic training methods are simply not ample for the modern day battlefield & the injuries that are likely to be sustained. And just a little tag line for you to consider, of all the NATO forces that use this training you'll find it's the Countries that have the most "Boots on the ground" & as such the more risk of battlefield casualties, that see this training as imperative to the well being of their Troops.

Eric 04-03-2014 20:04

Re: Animals killed for training
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Accyexplorer (Post 1096667)
I THINK this 'behaviour' with pigs is unnecessary

Me too ...

But there are a couple of things I don't understand. Why are most of those who oppose your views assuming that you value pigs more than humans? I really haven't read anything that you posted which states this. And why, if the practice is illegal in the UK, is your Ministry of Defence sending members of your armed forces overseas to a place where it is legal? Surely, if it were such, as someone whose opinion I respect said, a "necessary evil", the practice would be allowed in Britain. It would save lots of money, and would take place in a country where bacon sandwiches are haute cuisine ... a not unimportant side benefit.;)

Gordon Booth 04-03-2014 20:06

Re: Animals killed for training
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Less (Post 1096674)
Yes, I know, I'll start posting more when I get used to the site and find out if the members are friendly.

Watch out for the click!

gpick24 04-03-2014 20:15

Re: Animals killed for training
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Eric (Post 1096702)
Me too ...

But there are a couple of things I don't understand. Why are most of those who oppose your views assuming that you value pigs more than humans? I really haven't read anything that you posted which states this. And why, if the practice is illegal in the UK, is your Ministry of Defence sending members of your armed forces overseas to a place where it is legal? Surely, if it were such, as someone whose opinion I respect said, a "necessary evil", the practice would be allowed in Britain. It would save lots of money, and would take place in a country where bacon sandwiches are haute cuisine ... a not unimportant side benefit.;)

According to here - Ministry of Defence defends shooting pigs for medical training at Nato's training facilities in Jaegerspris, Denmark | Metro News - it`s not illegal. "The MoD argued that although the practice would not be illegal in the UK, approval would have to be obtained on a case-by-case basis from the Home Office."
So why go to Denmark? From the link in original post - "by participating in the Danish-led exercises twice a year rather than conducting our own, we minimise the overall number of animals used.”

Accyexplorer 04-03-2014 20:30

Re: Animals killed for training
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Eric (Post 1096702)
Me too ...

But there are a couple of things I don't understand. Why are most of those who oppose your views assuming that you value pigs more than humans? I really haven't read anything that you posted which states this.

That's just members jumping to assumptions,bit hypocritical but I let hem get on with it.....


....It's sad but I kind of like letting them land in ignorance ;)


Ps don't say anything that doesn't fit into their bubble.

Wynonie Harris 04-03-2014 21:29

Re: Animals killed for training
 
Ignorance? Have you bothered to read DinG and Margaret's posts, amongst others? Between them, they know more about medical matters and the dangers our troops face in the field than you ever will. Face it, your views have been totally trashed by cold logic, well-reasoned arguments and hard facts. Best just to quit while you're behind.

Accyexplorer 04-03-2014 21:32

Re: Animals killed for training
 
'I personally' have a problem with inhumane treatment of food animals, I also have a problem with subjecting that animal to 'unnecessary' stress, pain, or fear or all of the aforementioned. Anesthesia is not always 100% effective, it's not unheard of for patients under anesthetic to wake and experience pain,stress and fear.....

...Also anesthetic and bullets make the meat inedible (unless you take a few of our local fast food outlets),so it makes this practice a bit wasteful from a practical perspective.

I can agree that training is better than no training.
Can we agree the training is of far greater value than the suffering? I think not.

gpick24 04-03-2014 21:56

Re: Animals killed for training
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Accyexplorer (Post 1096712)
...Also anesthetic and bullets make the meat inedible...

Can you elaborate on that? Perhaps a link or two.

Eric 04-03-2014 22:11

Re: Animals killed for training
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by gpick24 (Post 1096705)
According to here - Ministry of Defence defends shooting pigs for medical training at Nato's training facilities in Jaegerspris, Denmark | Metro News - it`s not illegal. "The MoD argued that although the practice would not be illegal in the UK, approval would have to be obtained on a case-by-case basis from the Home Office."
So why go to Denmark? From the link in original post - "by participating in the Danish-led exercises twice a year rather than conducting our own, we minimise the overall number of animals used.”

Now ... that makes some sense ...

But there's another question: Why, if the practice has advantages, is it not part of the training of civilian doctors? There is certainly no shortage of beat up bodies from motor vehicle accidents ... not to mention terrorist attacks.

Eric 04-03-2014 22:13

Re: Animals killed for training
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by gpick24 (Post 1096713)
Can you elaborate on that? Perhaps a link or two.

We can leave that up to C'mon.;) The link thingy, not the elaboration.:D

gpick24 04-03-2014 22:20

Re: Animals killed for training
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Eric (Post 1096716)
We can leave that up to C'mon. The link thingy, not the elaboration.

I know I asked Accyexplorer, but I bet you can answer part of it (unless I`ve mistaken you for another member:rolleyes:), can shot animals be eaten?

Eric 04-03-2014 22:43

Re: Animals killed for training
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Accyexplorer (Post 1096706)
That's just members jumping to assumptions,bit hypocritical but I let hem get on with it.....


....It's sad but I kind of like letting them land in ignorance ;)


Ps don't say anything that doesn't fit into their bubble.

But if one doesn't wish members to jump to assumptions ... and I don't see the hypocrisy in that ... one might make clear that one is not showing a lack of concern for the safety of the troops, merely advocating research into training methods that do not include experiments on animals. And there is the wider question about using animals as experimental subjects. This could be addressed without going off topic. I don't believe that those who post on here are insensitive to the suffering of animals, nor do I believe that they wouldn't support research into alternatives.

Oh ... there are no cliques on here. Except maybe "The Fellowship of the Hat" ... and that is ultra-exclusive and international.:D

Retlaw 04-03-2014 22:51

Re: Animals killed for training
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Accyexplorer (Post 1096712)
'I personally' have a problem with inhumane treatment of food animals, I also have a problem with subjecting that animal to 'unnecessary' stress, pain, or fear or all of the aforementioned. Anesthesia is not always 100% effective, it's not unheard of for patients under anesthetic to wake and experience pain,stress and fear.....

...Also anesthetic and bullets make the meat inedible (unless you take a few of our local fast food outlets),so it makes this practice a bit wasteful from a practical perspective.

I can agree that training is better than no training.
Can we agree the training is of far greater value than the suffering? I think not.

Will ti fur christ sake shut up, thas bin blatherin on fur ages, no body agrees with thi, tha like one mon I know as can talk all day, an when he's finished he's said nowt.
By the way most deer meat is obtained by shooting.

Accyexplorer 04-03-2014 22:52

Re: Animals killed for training
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by gpick24 (Post 1096717)
I know I asked Accyexplorer, but I bet you can answer part of it (unless I`ve mistaken you for another member:rolleyes:), can shot animals be eaten?

Not these ones,their full of clotting agents as well as the other things I mentioned,They have probably been dead too long to be put back onto the food chain,I believe they are burned as medical waste (I've no links at min though)...maybe not the bullets :p

gpick24 04-03-2014 22:54

Re: Animals killed for training
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Retlaw (Post 1096721)
By the way most deer meat is obtained by shooting.

That`s where I was going Retlaw, along with Duck, pheasant, Rabbit, Goose etc.

gpick24 04-03-2014 23:01

Re: Animals killed for training
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Accyexplorer (Post 1096722)
Not these ones,their full of clotting agents as well as the other things I mentioned,They have probably been dead too long to be put back onto the food chain,I believe they are burned as medical waste (I've no links at min though) :p

Nothing to do with anaesthetic and bullets then. I`m sure you made a point earlier that pigs that survived went on to be killed (the more the better, shows the trainings working) so how have they been dead too long?
And just because I`m in an awkward mood tonight, "They have probably been dead too long" is an assumption for which you called other members hypocrites earlier.

Accyexplorer 04-03-2014 23:01

Re: Animals killed for training
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Retlaw (Post 1096721)
Will ti fur christ sake shut up, thas bin blatherin on fur ages, no body agrees with thi, tha like one mon I know as can talk all day, an when he's finished he's said nowt.
By the way most deer meat is obtained by shooting.

Ok :D

Eric 04-03-2014 23:15

Re: Animals killed for training
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by gpick24 (Post 1096723)
That`s where I was going Retlaw, along with Duck, pheasant, Rabbit, Goose etc.



My cousin Vinny deer clip - YouTube

Me, I hunt and fish ... but I don't eat bacon.:D

gpick24 04-03-2014 23:21

Re: Animals killed for training
 
Love my cousin Vinny (not literally - the film), don`t even need to play that clip i`ve seen it so many times. http://www.golfwrx.com/forums/public...ult/hunter.gif

Eric 05-03-2014 00:06

Re: Animals killed for training
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by gpick24 (Post 1096727)
Love my cousin Vinny (not literally - the film), don`t even need to play that clip i`ve seen it so many times. http://www.golfwrx.com/forums/public...ult/hunter.gif

Me too ... a real gut buster.:D

Eric 05-03-2014 00:24

Re: Animals killed for training
 
In fact, I think I'll watch it again tonite ... it's bloody cold and snowing like a sonofabitch; so, I'll curl up with a dog and a couple of cats, spark up a fatty, pour myself a few drinks and forget about all this silly seriousness.;)

patgonzalez 21-03-2014 08:17

Re: Animals killed for training
 
this can never be justified! How could they do that to helpless animals who are living freely in the wild? No life, even animal's , should be used for purposes such as this. How barbaric and yes, animalistic!

Margaret Pilkington 21-03-2014 09:33

Re: Animals killed for training
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by patgonzalez (Post 1098748)
this can never be justified! How could they do that to helpless animals who are living freely in the wild? No life, even animal's , should be used for purposes such as this. How barbaric and yes, animalistic!

You obviously have not read the previous threads to make such a comment.
Perhaps if you had, then you would have commented in a more intelligent and reasoned manner.

Less 21-03-2014 09:43

Re: Animals killed for training
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by patgonzalez (Post 1098748)
this can never be justified! How could they do that to helpless animals who are living freely in the wild? No life, even animal's , should be used for purposes such as this. How barbaric and yes, animalistic!


Can I just warn everyone that there is a hidden url in the above post, (I have removed it from this quote), I have reported it, so until a mod can remove it completely, please don't quote the post.
It doesn't seem to work at the moment but I did get it to work and it is for a porn site.
:o

Margaret Pilkington 21-03-2014 09:45

Re: Animals killed for training
 
Sorry Less...I didn't know. How can you tell? I am just interested

Less 21-03-2014 09:53

Re: Animals killed for training
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Margaret Pilkington (Post 1098764)
Sorry Less...I didn't know. How can you tell? I am just interested

No problem Margaret, I'd sent a report an hour or so ago, didn't think to warn folk then.


If you press the 'quote' button on that post the URL appears at the bottom of the quote, he/she has coloured it to the same as the background, fortunately it doesn't work he/she didn't do it right, but had it worked when moving your cursor over it, it would have changed to the finger for a link clicking on it would have taken you to a porn site.

These spammers are really trying to be clever.
:)

Margaret Pilkington 21-03-2014 10:06

Re: Animals killed for training
 
Ah, I never noticed. They are going to have to get up a lot earlier to beat you !

Neil 21-03-2014 10:18

Re: Animals killed for training
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Less (Post 1098766)
These spammers are really trying to be clever.
:)

Thanks for the report, I have removed the links now. Not sure what the point of it was because you couldn't easily follow the link and I didn't go to the site to see what it was

Studio25 21-03-2014 11:47

Re: Animals killed for training
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Neil (Post 1098773)
...Not sure what the point of it was because you couldn't easily follow the link...

Could be trying to get a good ranking on Google - this is a very active forum and probably gets crawled quite a lot.

DaveinGermany 02-11-2014 10:52

Re: Animals killed for training
 
I know it's reopening an old thread, but just reading this article today it highlights that the means used to train & advance military medics skills (regardless how people feel personally) via hands on, practical experience & sometimes drastic measures have definitely benefited our troops. That said, it has also had a knock on effect which has been carried across to parts of the NHS. The result, improving casualties chances & increased survivability rates for the man on the street.

NHS adopts trauma skills developed at military hospital in Afghanistan - Health News - Health & Families - The Independent

Margaret Pilkington 02-11-2014 12:04

Re: Animals killed for training
 
There is absolutely nothing to compare with experiential learning.
Lessons learned in this way are never ever lost....and what is more, they can be built on and the transfer of knowledge and skills has to be a positive event.
So out of what was a very unfortunate and difficult event, positives have emerged........and lives will be saved from what was learned in a theatre of war.

I read that article(with great interest - I have never lost my thirst for medical information and advances) but didn't consider posting it in this thread....but it does deserve a wider audience.

Eric 02-11-2014 16:55

Re: Animals killed for training
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Margaret Pilkington (Post 1122728)
There is absolutely nothing to compare with experiential learning.

Are we talking about the thread topic ... or the link to porn sites.:confused:

Margaret Pilkington 02-11-2014 17:05

Re: Animals killed for training
 
what link to porn sites Eric?

Gordon Booth 02-11-2014 18:27

Re: Animals killed for training
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Margaret Pilkington (Post 1122752)
what link to porn sites Eric?

Margaret! I'm surprised at you!

Margaret Pilkington 02-11-2014 18:35

Re: Animals killed for training
 
I am glad I can still surprise you Gordon, but it was a totally innocent question.......I can see no porn site links in this thread.....unless I am missing something.

Gordon Booth 02-11-2014 19:08

Re: Animals killed for training
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Margaret Pilkington (Post 1122756)
I can see no porn site links in this thread.....unless I am missing something.

Neither did I. I may just have to go back and check it out.;)

Margaret Pilkington 02-11-2014 19:37

Re: Animals killed for training
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gordon Booth (Post 1122761)
Neither did I. I may just have to go back and check it out.;)

let me know if you find anything....after all we must report it :)

Restless 06-11-2014 19:07

Re: Animals killed for training
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Accyexplorer (Post 1096445)
why not use dead ones?

They are training to save lives not to be morticians

Eric 07-11-2014 12:13

Re: Animals killed for training
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Restless (Post 1123022)
They are training to save lives not to be morticians

But there is no reason that they can't use humans instead of animals ... after all, it's been done before, and has a well-documented history.

Nazi Human Experimentation | ReduceTheBurden.org

It appears as if the only part of Genesis which is still taken almost literally is the Sixth Day ... sorry Kevin, I know you believe it all;) ... Although we seem to have ignored is the "replenish the earth" bit in order to concentrate on the "Be fruitful and multiply" part ... especially on weekends after a few drinks ... and the "subdue it and have dominion" thingies.

Since I was born, (altho' I don't think it has anything to do with me) there has been an explosion of technological progress; better mousetraps are built on a daily basis, almost hourly in the case of the IPhone. Hell, we even have cars that park themselves so that women are not such a threat when they get behind the wheel. There's gotta be a better way ... and the reason we are so successful as a species is that we inevitably find it.

Oh, and the "mousetrap" thing ... I mean no disrespect to Pixie and Dixie.;)

Gordon Booth 07-11-2014 13:22

Re: Animals killed for training
 
Not sure about the better mousetraps- we had a lot of field mice in the garage, chewing holes etc.
Went for a couple of mousetraps, saw the old fashioned ones and the new fancy ones, expensive but 'humane and effective'.
Set them, next day there's a mouse scrabbling around the garage backwards with a trap on its head. How do you dispatch a mouse with its head covered by a trap?
Happened a couple of more times so I threw them away and got a couple of good old fashioned traps- no arguing with them- also very effective on fingers!

Eric 07-11-2014 13:54

Re: Animals killed for training
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gordon Booth (Post 1123054)
Not sure about the better mousetraps- we had a lot of field mice in the garage, chewing holes etc.
Went for a couple of mousetraps, saw the old fashioned ones and the new fancy ones, expensive but 'humane and effective'.
Set them, next day there's a mouse scrabbling around the garage backwards with a trap on its head. How do you dispatch a mouse with its head covered by a trap?
Happened a couple of more times so I threw them away and got a couple of good old fashioned traps- no arguing with them- also very effective on fingers!

I once has a ball bearing mousetrap ... but I had him neutered.;)

Restless 08-11-2014 11:44

Re: Animals killed for training
 
Wasn't condoning the actions just answering what I thought was a silly question

Less 09-11-2014 15:46

Re: Re: Animals killed for training
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Restless (Post 1123116)
Wasn't condoning the actions just answering what I thought was a silly question

Well maybe it was a silly question and maybe you don't condone the actions, I personally can only see two ways to go, use animals or use Accyexplorer, I know the animals would be sadly missed, can anyone the the same about our virtual village idiot?

Restless 09-11-2014 15:49

Re: Animals killed for training
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Less (Post 1123192)
Well maybe it was a silly question and maybe you don't condone the actions, I personally can only see two ways to go, use animals or use Accyexplorer, I know the animals would be sadly missed, can anyone the the same about our virtual village idiot?

I think he'll be ok with that as he will most likely enjoy the stuff they give to anaesthetise

Gordon Booth 09-11-2014 16:10

Re: Animals killed for training
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Restless (Post 1123194)
I think he'll be ok with that as he will most likely enjoy the stuff they give to anaesthetise

Judging by some of his threads and posts he won't need it, he's already using a quite effective one a lot of the time.

accyman 13-11-2014 16:18

Re: Animals killed for training
 
do we have to have seperate doctors that dont use methods learned from swine on the battlefield to cater for people who dont like pigs or object to the use of pigs for training ?

its ok been english and loving animals were known for it but im guessing somones objections would somewhat subside when they find themselves with half tehir leg blown off in a ditch

Accyexplorer 13-11-2014 17:46

Re: Animals killed for training
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Less (Post 1123192)
Well maybe it was a silly question and maybe you don't condone the actions, I personally can only see two ways to go, use animals or use Accyexplorer, I know the animals would be sadly missed, can anyone the the same about our virtual village idiot?

There is a third option, we could use the elderly....

..... 'anything to help save our boys' :rolleyes:

DtheP47 13-11-2014 20:59

Re: Animals killed for training
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Accyexplorer (Post 1123508)
There is a third option, we could use the elderly....

..... 'anything to help save our boys' :rolleyes:

What a wizard idea AccyX :D

Gordon Booth 13-11-2014 21:04

Re: Animals killed for training
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by DtheP47 (Post 1123525)
What a wizard idea AccyX :D

I like it!
You're a senior citizen. Are you volunteering?

DtheP47 13-11-2014 22:16

Re: Animals killed for training
 
There's older folks than me need a ticket to ride across the Styx with Charon Gordon.
My work here is not done.

Margaret Pilkington 14-11-2014 07:15

Re: Animals killed for training
 
That idea would see me off too......and my work here is definitely not done.

cashman 14-11-2014 07:41

Re: Animals killed for training
 
What i daft idea, I'm going nowhere in the football season.:D

DtheP47 14-11-2014 12:20

Re: Animals killed for training
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by cashman (Post 1123540)
What i daft idea, I'm going nowhere in the football season.:D

Hartlepool in April Ol...... ?
You'll need your jabs.

cashman 14-11-2014 12:43

Re: Animals killed for training
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by DtheP47 (Post 1123564)
Hartlepool in April Ol...... ?
You'll need your jabs.

Nah am off back to Spain then D.;)

Accyexplorer 16-11-2014 02:26

Re: Animals killed for training
 
Maybe we could restrict it to those with a life expectancy less than a pint of milk that's been left out the fridge..... (hopefully) that way none of accyweb's members would be tested on anytime soon.

Margaret Pilkington 16-11-2014 07:11

Re: Animals killed for training
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Accyexplorer (Post 1123771)
Maybe we could restrict it to those with a life expectancy less than a pint of milk that's been left out the fridge..... (hopefully) that way none of accyweb's members would be tested on anytime soon.

You mean those who are already sick...or dying?

Accyexplorer 16-11-2014 07:59

Re: Animals killed for training
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Margaret Pilkington (Post 1123781)
You mean those who are already sick...or dying?

Yes :hidewall:

Margaret Pilkington 16-11-2014 08:14

Re: Animals killed for training
 
that wall is not big enough!

DaveinGermany 16-11-2014 08:40

Re: Animals killed for training
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Accyexplorer (Post 1123508)
There is a third option, we could use the elderly....

I just bet your dear old Mum will be ecstatic about this stroke of genius from her little boy! :rolleyes:

Less 16-11-2014 08:48

Re: Re: Animals killed for training
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by DaveinGermany (Post 1123795)
I just bet your dear old Mum will be ecstatic about this stroke of genius from her little boy! :rolleyes:

She would probably jump at the chance and volunteer for it, it would make a change from the drudgery of having to wash his bedclothes every morning!

Gordon Booth 16-11-2014 09:55

Re: Animals killed for training
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Accyexplorer (Post 1123771)
Maybe we could restrict it to those with a life expectancy less than a pint of milk that's been left out the fridge..... (hopefully) that way none of accyweb's members would be tested on anytime soon.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Margaret Pilkington (Post 1123781)
You mean those who are already sick...or dying?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Accyexplorer (Post 1123783)
Yes :hidewall:

You come over as fairly sick, AccyE.

Why don't we make you the first volunteer?

Accyexplorer 16-11-2014 10:35

Re: Animals killed for training
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by DaveinGermany (Post 1123795)
I just bet your dear old Mum will be ecstatic about this stroke of genius from her little boy! :rolleyes:

I thought it was just Margaret's funny bone that was in the wrong place D :rolleyes:


Quote:

Originally Posted by Less (Post 1123797)
She would probably jump at the chance and volunteer for it, it would make a change from the drudgery of having to wash his bedclothes every morning!

:thefinger


Quote:

Originally Posted by Gordon Booth (Post 1123801)
You come over as fairly sick, AccyE.

Why don't we make you the first volunteer?

Behave G, I'm starting to find your comments amusing :D

Less 16-11-2014 10:41

Re: Animals killed for training
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Less View Post
She would probably jump at the chance and volunteer for it, it would make a change from the drudgery of having to wash his bedclothes every morning!

:thefinger

Is that it?

No tantrum filled denials?

Accyexplorer 16-11-2014 10:47

Re: Animals killed for training
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Less (Post 1123814)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Less View Post
She would probably jump at the chance and volunteer for it, it would make a change from the drudgery of having to wash his bedclothes every morning!

:thefinger

Is that it?

No tantrum filled denials?

No, you'll only report me if I bite at your childish antagonistic comments :rolleyes:

Margaret Pilkington 16-11-2014 10:50

Re: Animals killed for training
 
What funny bone......?
I think I had it removed some time ago...it had arthritis in it and was becoming a pain in the elbow......see, I do know my ar$e from my elbow

Less 16-11-2014 11:02

Re: Animals killed for training
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Accyexplorer (Post 1123818)
No, you'll only report me if I bite at your childish antagonistic comments :rolleyes:

So instead we have obsession time?

I bet you have been reported many, many times and most of them won't have been me.

By the way, is the above not you biting? If not perhaps you could give us one of your unique slants on what it is?

Gordon Booth 16-11-2014 11:35

Re: Animals killed for training
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Accyexplorer (Post 1123808)

Behave G, I'm starting to find your comments amusing :D

I do apologise, AccyE.
I would never amuse you intentionally.

Accyexplorer 16-11-2014 12:34

Re: Animals killed for training
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gordon Booth (Post 1123825)
I do apologise, AccyE.
I would never amuse you intentionally.

Well, I guess you can only amuse yourself for so long :gooddog:

Gordon Booth 16-11-2014 13:58

Re: Animals killed for training
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Accyexplorer (Post 1123831)
Well, I guess you can only amuse yourself for so long :gooddog:

You may think that, I couldn't possibly comment.

dotti34 16-11-2014 20:06

Re: Animals killed for training
 
Oh, dear! AccyX you really are a prat suggesting old people be ‘sacrificed’ in the name of modern medicine. As I am in the category of those who are much, much closer to the end than the beginning you might have cut me to the quick with your suggestion of using old bods. That is, of course, if you were of any consequence to me. Fortunately you are not.

Why do you set out to be so obnoxious? Some of your threads and postings are actually reasonably intelligent and meaningful but then you blow it by such an inane comment. Not even a very smart one. You let yourself down somewhat.

With reference to the use of animals in testing medications – which, after all, was sort of what you started this thread about, albeit on a slightly different tack, I do think it is abhorrent – but like most people I do not question it if and when I am receiving medicinal drugs. I doubt that even you, AccyX, with all your blathering and bleating, if needing a life-saving drug would refuse it on the grounds of your perceived condemnation of the use of animals in its trials. Talk is cheap.

I am now going to spend another very meaningful day before the milk turns well and truly sour.

Accyexplorer 16-11-2014 23:58

Re: Animals killed for training
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by dotti34 (Post 1123888)
Oh, dear! AccyX you really are a prat suggesting old people be ‘sacrificed’ in the name of modern medicine. As I am in the category of those who are much, much closer to the end than the beginning you might have cut me to the quick with your suggestion of using old bods. That is, of course, if you were of any consequence to me. Fortunately you are not.

Why do you set out to be so obnoxious? Some of your threads and postings are actually reasonably intelligent and meaningful but then you blow it by such an inane comment. Not even a very smart one. You let yourself down somewhat.

With reference to the use of animals in testing medications – which, after all, was sort of what you started this thread about, albeit on a slightly different tack, I do think it is abhorrent – but like most people I do not question it if and when I am receiving medicinal drugs. I doubt that even you, AccyX, with all your blathering and bleating, if needing a life-saving drug would refuse it on the grounds of your perceived condemnation of the use of animals in its trials. Talk is cheap.

I am now going to spend another very meaningful day before the milk turns well and truly sour.

Dotti,my remark about using the elderly was a mere knee jerk reaction to the comment before it.As usual it was taken out of context an twisted to portray me as the bad guy :rolleyes:
I know,it didn't help answering Margaret's question with a "yes" but I couldn't resist,I can assure you D I'm not a bad guy when all is said and done :)

I didn't set out to be unpleasant,that's just my reaction to the obnoxious comments I've received.Maybe that's the reason I've become a "troll" or perhaps I am naturally obnoxious and I don't realise it :confused:

I believe your correct in that "talk is cheap" especially in a environment tailored for making comments.
God forbid I find myself in a 'life threatening situation' but if I did I probably wouldn't refuse a medicine on the grounds that it was tested on animals in its trail period as my natural instinct to survive would prevail.

I hope this cleared up some of your queries D. Now,if you don't mind I'll get back to my "trolling" ;)

Margaret Pilkington 17-11-2014 07:21

Re: Animals killed for training
 
Jason, I do not believe that you are a bad guy.
I do not believe that you are malicious either. You have the potential to post interesting stuff.....and you have done so......but you spoil yourself with some posts that seem to be posted without thinking things through.....posts without consideration.
You need not be a troll.....there is no future in it and no pleasure(either for you, or for those who come to read posts)in it.
When you portray yourself negatively people will believe you.You have to work hard to be seen as a positive poster......and this doesn't mean that you have to always agree, it just means that you have to respect the other posters view(even if that other poster makes fun of you....ridicules you.....no one can make you feel small unless you give them permission- a quote by some famous woman. I'm tempted to say Eleanor Roosevelt, except I think her quote involved a doormat).
Don't post knee jerk reactions......wait and consider your response(I wish I had learned that lesson earlier)....don't rise to the bait.

Accyexplorer 17-11-2014 08:28

Re: Animals killed for training
 
Gee, I feel like a naughty schoolboy that just had a rollicking off his teachers.

I'll bear your comments in mind and try thinking before posting in future :o

Margaret Pilkington 17-11-2014 10:12

Re: Animals killed for training
 
Why would you feel like that Jason.....my comments are meant in the best possible way to give you some advice and insight.
They were never meant as a rollicking......I am just a bit disappointed that you have not learned from your past errors......as I say, you showed potential to be a worthy member of the forum...and there is no reason why that cannot be so in the future.

Eric 17-11-2014 12:50

Re: Animals killed for training
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Margaret Pilkington (Post 1123819)
What funny bone......?

Your humerus maybe:confused:

Eric 17-11-2014 12:55

Re: Animals killed for training
 
Seems like members of ISIS practice their surgical skills on human subjects.

ISIS beheading video shows Welsh medical student, father says - World - CBC News

By the way, I think it's an insult to taffies all over the world that this complete waste of skin is referred to as "Welsh."

Gordon Booth 17-11-2014 15:27

Re: Animals killed for training
 
The plot thickens.

BBC News - Nasser Muthana's father denies son is in beheading video

But then, now he's had time to think about it, he would, wouldn't he?

Less 17-11-2014 15:30

Re: Re: Animals killed for training
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gordon Booth (Post 1123965)

Nope, the plot just sickens.

DtheP47 17-11-2014 17:03

Re: Animals killed for training
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Eric (Post 1123959)
Seems like members of ISIS practice their surgical skills on human subjects.

ISIS beheading video shows Welsh medical student, father says - World - CBC News

By the way, I think it's an insult to taffies all over the world that this complete waste of skin is referred to as "Welsh."


Guardian today says British Intelligence are focused on Abdel Majed Abdel Bary with the nom de guerre Abu Abdullah al Britani as being Jihadi John.

Let's see what happens now.


All times are GMT. The time now is 00:06.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com