Accrington Web

Accrington Web (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/index.php)
-   General Chat (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f69/)
-   -   She asked for it ... (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f69/she-asked-for-it-66589.html)

DtheP47 25-09-2014 08:57

Re: She asked for it ...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by shillelagh (Post 1118619)
its quite regular occurrence for people to be using their mobile phones driving through rising bridge ... sales people on their phones booking their next appointment, mums (with kids in the back of the car) talking to a friend, even saw a lorry driver using his mobile ..
oh and a policeman using his mobile ...

Foreign truckers with laptops I see more and more. Yes they may will be using it for navigation via GPS but has to be a distraction
Have a look at Darwin Awards for mind boggling display of mans ingenuity to arrange his departure from the gene pool

Studio25 25-09-2014 11:00

Re: She asked for it ...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Eric (Post 1118587)
Why:confused: Serious question ... maybe things are different over there; but I can't see the difficulty. There should be ways of doing this ... for example, the V.I.N. must be registered to someone.

There's a limitation of two weeks on the police sending out a "notice of intention to prosecute". Assuming you haven't done anything to scupper the receipt of the notice (such as moving house without telling them), it is considered to be an acceptable defence to say "I do not recall who was driving". The police send the NIP to the registered keeper - who isn't necessarily the vehicle owner or driver.

It's all a crock, really. While it's possible for anyone to drive a car (with the keeper's permission, if their own insurance covers them) I can guarantee that in the vast majority of cases, the keeper can remember who has driven it, out of the named people on the insurance and the people that have been given permission, for way longer than two weeks.

It's just that the law has to be seen to be fair to everyone, so people like me, who can recall exactly who else has used my car in the last six months have to be treated the same as a fleet manager, who will even have to make notes despite the limitation being just two weeks.

Eric 25-09-2014 12:19

Re: She asked for it ...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Studio25 (Post 1118642)
There's a limitation of two weeks on the police sending out a "notice of intention to prosecute". Assuming you haven't done anything to scupper the receipt of the notice (such as moving house without telling them), it is considered to be an acceptable defence to say "I do not recall who was driving". The police send the NIP to the registered keeper - who isn't necessarily the vehicle owner or driver.

It's all a crock, really. While it's possible for anyone to drive a car (with the keeper's permission, if their own insurance covers them) I can guarantee that in the vast majority of cases, the keeper can remember who has driven it, out of the named people on the insurance and the people that have been given permission, for way longer than two weeks.

It's just that the law has to be seen to be fair to everyone, so people like me, who can recall exactly who else has used my car in the last six months have to be treated the same as a fleet manager, who will even have to make notes despite the limitation being just two weeks.

Weird, eh. Don't matter who was driving the vehicle ... the ticket goes to the owner. Somebody has to own the vehicle.

Neil 25-09-2014 13:12

Re: She asked for it ...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by accyman (Post 1118579)
....one thing for sure is that if you take away the car and crush it the owner will be easy enough to spot he or she will be the one screming and jumping up and down demanding a replacement car

You don't need to crush it, you can use existing laws about obstruction to remove vehicles. Like you say the owners will soon show there faces and admit who they are.

Neil 25-09-2014 13:14

Re: She asked for it ...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Studio25 (Post 1118642)
There's a limitation of two weeks on the police sending out a "notice of intention to prosecute". Assuming you haven't done anything to scupper the receipt of the notice (such as moving house without telling them), it is considered to be an acceptable defence to say "I do not recall who was driving". The police send the NIP to the registered keeper - who isn't necessarily the vehicle owner or driver.

It's all a crock, really. While it's possible for anyone to drive a car (with the keeper's permission, if their own insurance covers them) I can guarantee that in the vast majority of cases, the keeper can remember who has driven it, out of the named people on the insurance and the people that have been given permission, for way longer than two weeks.

It's just that the law has to be seen to be fair to everyone, so people like me, who can recall exactly who else has used my car in the last six months have to be treated the same as a fleet manager, who will even have to make notes despite the limitation being just two weeks.

That only needs a change in the law though. As a car owner you should be responsible for knowing who is driving it. If you manage a fleet of 100 cars you should have to keep a log of who is driving that day.

Eric 25-09-2014 16:35

Re: She asked for it ...
 
And now we have distracted flying ... Oh, Boeing Guy, where are you:D?

The end of the first paragraph shows that whoever wrote it has a sense of humour ... surprised there was no mention of "joystick":eek:

Air Canada grapples with 'explicit' material in cockpit - Business - CBC News

US Angel 25-09-2014 17:51

Re: She asked for it ...
 
Still sad for the family of this young girl

off topic ( a bit)
One thing they do over here on the Military Posts is display wrecked cars where it be drink, drugs, speed etc after having friends hurt and killed in these do not agreed with this practice. They say it helps bring the numbers down Right ok what every

Eric 25-09-2014 18:23

Re: She asked for it ...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by US Angel (Post 1118667)
Still sad for the family of this young girl

off topic ( a bit)
One thing they do over here on the Military Posts is display wrecked cars where it be drink, drugs, speed etc after having friends hurt and killed in these do not agreed with this practice. They say it helps bring the numbers down Right ok what every

It is sad for the family; but obviously, she didn't think about that. There's no shortage of info out there on the dangers of distracted driving. It's not as if the police, or MTO (or whatever the equivalent) are keeping this thing a secret.

We don't have the wrecked car thingy here ... altho' I believe such graphic reminders would have a positive impact ... but there are lots of crosses by the side of the highway, marking accident sites.

Barrie Yates 28-09-2014 00:04

Re: She asked for it ...
 
They had them at accident sites in Tucson in the '80s along with photographs of the injured/dead

Studio25 28-09-2014 09:41

Re: She asked for it ...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Eric (Post 1118675)
Quote:

Originally Posted by US Angel (Post 1118667)
...One thing they do over here on the Military Posts is display wrecked cars where it be drink, drugs, speed etc after having friends hurt and killed in these do not agreed with this practice. They say it helps bring the numbers down Right ok what every

...We don't have the wrecked car thingy here ...

Yes we do.

Margaret Pilkington 28-09-2014 09:53

Re: She asked for it ...
 
This young man's car was on Broadway in Accrington recently.
I think that perhaps instead of leaving flowers as a remembrance at a site where a driver has died, the police should leave a huge poster of the wrecked car.......I was going to say that the wrecked car should be placed at the side of the road, but I reckon this would be a distraction to drivers...more so than a poster.


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:35.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com