![]() |
Re: Exit Polls
I do not think I am alone in these thoughts.
How is it we can put a man on the moon, but yet getting over petrol/diesel driven transport is beyond us? When thinking of transport we need to consider the movement of goods. Can you see large container lorries being powered by electric? No - neither can I. And then there is the thorny problem of disposing of the many worn out batteries over the years. These are not small things to dispose of....so where do they go? All of these things should be being investigated...as should ALL alternative forms of powering our domestic and industrial needs. That is, of course, unless we really want to go back to the stone age. |
Re: Exit Polls
Here is some very interesting information about this genius..he was ahead of his time.
Just in case you are interested. Accyweb where education comes to you. Nikola Tesla - Inventions - HISTORY.com |
Re: Exit Polls
Quote:
|
Re: Exit Polls
Quote:
How would you heat the water to produce the steam? |
Re: Exit Polls
Quote:
|
Re: Exit Polls
Quote:
|
Re: Exit Polls
This is not the first discussion on transport that has ended up going round in circles! ;)
|
Re: Exit Polls
Quote:
|
Re: Exit Polls
Quote:
|
Re: Exit Polls
Quote:
The salt breaks down into sulphuric acid and chlorine...but if you know different then I am ready to be educated. |
Re: Exit Polls
Quote:
Now we're x years down the line & Germany are pushing the green agenda, the % of bio-diesel mixed with normal diesel is now 10% & there's no way of avoiding it, the vehicles are better equipped to deal with the mixture & everything is just hunky dory in "Mutti's" little world. Only problem is, that to produce the quantities required & demanded by the German governments "Targets", vast swathes of countryside have been turned over to growing maize & rape to be turned into bio-fuel for use within the reich. All well & good but that is then land that's not producing food for the populace so more imports are required to feed the masses & thereby raising cost ..... and so the cycle goes on. |
Re: Exit Polls
Quote:
|
Re: Exit Polls
That article is from 2015....and it stated that this was still in the experimental stage.
Is there any further information on what this method of obtaining hydrogen costs. For it to be a viable proposition it needs to be economical...somehow I doubt that this is the case right now. That is not to say that further developments in the future may not make it a viable proposition...in fact it would be good if that were the case. |
Re: Exit Polls
Quote:
2016, it's the future of power turning sea water into hydrogen fuel In the future, we plan to work on developing a method for the low-cost, large-scale production of H2O2 from seawater," Fukuzumi said. "This may replace the current high-cost production of H2O2 from H2 (from mainly natural gas) and O2 |
Re: Exit Polls
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 10:24. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com