Accrington Web - sex pests ...

Page 2 of 2

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

Accrington Web (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/index.php)

- General Chat (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f69/)

- - sex pests ... (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f69/sex-pests-8222.html)

Ianto.W.

15-04-2007 12:04

Re: sex pests ...

Quote:

Originally Posted by Neil (Post 411342)

And this helps how?
They were not allowed to commit the sex offences in the first place so I can't see how not being allowed to be near children will stop them.

What is this hate Ianto week I only asked a question?

Neil	15-04-2007 12:07

Re: sex pests ...

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ianto.W. (Post 411344)

What is this hate Ianto week I only asked a question?

Nothing personal at all.
It just seams like an idea to keep parents quiet that won't do a damn thing to stop someone who wants to re offend.

Ianto.W.

15-04-2007 12:10

Re: sex pests ...

Did anyone see the news clip? I thought it was an oddball idea too.

WillowTheWhisp

15-04-2007 13:36

Re: sex pests ...

It seems like they're in worse conditions than they would be in prison. I can imagine the European Human Rights bods would have something to say if we tried that here.

andrewb

15-04-2007 16:21

Re: sex pests ...

The thing I have is, if someone has actually been rehabilitated and dosn't intend to commit the crime again (if they do intend it they shouldn't be let out) then they shouldn't have the threat of vigilantly on them. Which we all know would happen if they were named and shamed.

Somebody who *looks* like someone who has been named could also get persecuted as was the case a few years ago.

Its a horrible crime, and we certainly shouldn't be soft on it, but I feel that a lot of people overlook it as a simple black and white case where they should just be named so everyone can protect their children which is of course all a parent wants, but its really not as simple as people make out.

Eric	25-04-2007 12:54

Re: sex pests ...

Quote:

Originally Posted by chav1 (Post 122309)

should it be legal to name and shame convicted child abusers and put up posters naming and shaming them

i ask this in the light of the jackson case because if his trial can be reported on in great detail whats the difference between watching reports on his trial and naming and shaming a convicted child molester

i wish there was a website where you could name and same these people

Something like this maybe: The headline in today's "Kingston Whig-Standard": "Sex offender moving to Kingston"; there follows a detailed description of Oscar Alcide L. Brosseau, with photos, criminal record, location of the halfway housse in which he will be staying, contact numbers for KPD, and a list of court-imposed restrictions. Well, it's better than nothing.

cashman

25-04-2007 14:21

Re: sex pests ...

well if the poll is 55-3 and anything like the view of the british public? the only message from government is you can all get STUFFED, we aint gonna do it.:rolleyes: of coarse they say it in better language but it means the same.

All times are GMT. The time now is 17:07.

Page 2 of 2

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page