Accrington Web
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

Accrington Web (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/index.php)
-   Accrington Stanley (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f93/)
-   -   New kit looks the dogs whatsits (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f93/new-kit-looks-the-dogs-whatsits-22972.html)

ossyclogger 19-07-2006 22:36
Re: New kit looks the dogs whatsits
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by BLACKBURN RAVER
what happened to nike ???????????.....back in the BIG time and lose a major sponsor :confused:
Nike were never sponsors, dimwit. They just sell overpriced tat.

Doug 19-07-2006 22:39
Re: New kit looks the dogs whatsits
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by BLACKBURN RAVER
its a football match ffs NOT the church :rolleyes: and besides the younger ones will no doubt know more vulgar language than you care to think ;)
Bollocks Mr Raver, I know it’s a Football match and I swear like hell. I was commenting that a couple of chaps where a little over top considering there was a small group young ones (under 10s) around them. Just a personal opinion and not a slight on Blackburn Rover fan’s even though you have all become fat a***ed and pampered.:D :D

BLACKBURN RAVER 19-07-2006 22:44
Re: New kit looks the dogs whatsits
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by ossyclogger
Nike were never sponsors, dimwit. They just sell overpriced tat.
iyou allways get one dont you. all i did was ask a simple question

f they wernt sponsors then stanley would not have been allowed to advertise nike on their shisrts.and would therfore have been done for copyright infringment....DIMWIT....think before posting eh ....:thefinger

BLACKBURN RAVER 19-07-2006 22:45
Re: New kit looks the dogs whatsits
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doug
Bollocks Mr Raver, I know it’s a Football match and I swear like hell. I was commenting that a couple of chaps where a little over top considering there was a small group young ones (under 10s) around them. Just a personal opinion and not a slight on Blackburn Rover fan’s even though you have all become fat a***ed and pampered.:D :D

:rofl38: ..:D ...:rofl38: ...;)

ossyclogger 19-07-2006 22:50
Re: New kit looks the dogs whatsits
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by BLACKBURN RAVER
iyou allways get one dont you. all i did was ask a simple question

f they wernt sponsors then stanley would not have been allowed to advertise nike on their shisrts.and would therfore have been done for copyright infringment....DIMWIT....think before posting eh ....:thefinger
They were not sponsors, they just made the shirts. The nike tick is on all the shirts they make. it's free advertising for them. PILLOCK. They don't sponsor every team that they make kit for.

KIPAX 20-07-2006 01:58
Re: New kit looks the dogs whatsits
 
http://www.kipax.com/mbgfx/sox.jpg

fc:stanley 20-07-2006 09:05
Re: New kit looks the dogs whatsits
 
Great Kit! :Banane47: been looking forward to seeing it! by the way kipax is it good material or flimsy like the nike one?

Mik Griff 20-07-2006 09:26
Re: New kit looks the dogs whatsits
 
Supposed to be better material than the Nike one.

keyco 20-07-2006 09:44
Re: New kit looks the dogs whatsits
 
have you got a pic of the keeper shirt that looked good aswel

Wynonie Harris 20-07-2006 09:47
Re: New kit looks the dogs whatsits
 
So can we now have a definite date from the club for when the shirts will go on sale please?

baldy 20-07-2006 10:25
Re: New kit looks the dogs whatsits
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doug
Pitch doesn’t look to bad to be honest, it is dry with quite a lot of sand under the surface but given the weather it isn’t that bad. It would be nice if we could have a players view.

I really enjoy the game and felt that the lads held themselves up quite well against what is a top side even if it is Blackburn.

For me, lots of good solid play and a few good chances although they aren’t showing their classy side yet I think we’re going to see some excellent football this season.

The Blackburn fans behaved far better than the Burnley lot for what I could see with some decent banter for most, just the odd comment I didn’t like and the heavy over the top swearing in front of some young ones was annoying.

The Kit? Fantastic styling, good rich colour which is well balanced by the white. The Stanley Crest look brilliant and the Fraser Eagle logo looks good as well. Buy one. I am.
Im not worrying too much on pre-season friendly wins although iti s nice to win...what happend last year when we didnt do well in pre-season?? :D:D:D

Diesel 20-07-2006 13:03
Re: New kit looks the dogs whatsits
 
They look grand, and apparently better material. Not hard though, two washes and my home top looked a mess, all bubbled. And the blue away top, despite looking fantastic, felt cheap and tacky.

sparkie 20-07-2006 13:44
Re: New kit looks the dogs whatsits
 
if thats what the home kit looks like I can't wait to see it in the away kit its really very nice indeed

Fatso 20-07-2006 14:18
Re: New kit looks the dogs whatsits
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by BLACKBURN RAVER
iyou allways get one dont you. all i did was ask a simple question

f they wernt sponsors then stanley would not have been allowed to advertise nike on their shisrts.and would therfore have been done for copyright infringment....DIMWIT....think before posting eh ....:thefinger
Nike logos are on every product they sell. As are the logos of every other type of shirt manufacturer on every shirt they sell. It's not sponsorship; it's advertising, promotion and branding.

So... who is the dimwit here...?

(Clue: it's you.)

Outback Ozzy 20-07-2006 16:53
Re: New kit looks the dogs whatsits
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by BLACKBURN RAVER
iyou allways get one dont you. all i did was ask a simple question

f they wernt sponsors then stanley would not have been allowed to advertise nike on their shisrts.and would therfore have been done for copyright infringment....DIMWIT....think before posting eh ....:thefinger
1. You got a simple answer and still did not understand it, who's simple then - clue its not the answerers to your questions!

2. methinks YOU should think before posting drivel.

:confused: clueless thats what you are


All times are GMT. The time now is 22:31.
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com