Accrington Web

Accrington Web (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/index.php)
-   Accrington Stanley (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f93/)
-   -   Stanley turn down Freedom of the Borough (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f93/stanley-turn-down-freedom-of-the-borough-26810.html)

KIPAX 16-12-2006 20:07

Re: Stanley turn down Freedom of the Borough
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by g jones (Post 352857)
If we are in control in May I would like to see the Supporters Club brought on board to 'oversee' what is happening..


hahahaha .....apart from the obvious re the supporters club....what chance have you got of winning anything in may after this... this thread will be coming back up when its time to vote...... its all going to come back and haunt you...

g jones 16-12-2006 20:09

Re: Stanley turn down Freedom of the Borough
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by KIPAX (Post 352866)
I dont have any view on whats going on.. All I know is that your in here causing trouble and slagging off the accrington stanley chairman who has done so much for the club and this town.. not the celeverest thing you have done..

Your right in one sense. I am here to express an opinion on the Accrington Stanley Chairman who has started a political row. If he is going to give stick, he has to accept he is going to receive it. Don't throw stones in greenhouses.

The other sense of course is standing up for what's right (IMO) and protecting the Council's assets.

accymel 16-12-2006 20:14

Re: Stanley turn down Freedom of the Borough
 
What im going to ask is gonna put the cat among the pigeons but........ what actually has Eric Whalley done for the TOWN ? we know what he's done for the club & the players:D

KIPAX 16-12-2006 20:16

Re: Stanley turn down Freedom of the Borough
 
accymel... if it needs explaining :(

KIPAX 16-12-2006 20:17

Re: Stanley turn down Freedom of the Borough
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by g jones (Post 352871)
If he is going to give stick, he has to accept he is going to receive it. Don't throw stones in greenhouses.


but he isnt in here is he... just you attacking him...

g jones 16-12-2006 20:17

Re: Stanley turn down Freedom of the Borough
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by KIPAX (Post 352869)
hahahaha .....apart from the obvious re the supporters club....what chance have you got of winning anything in may after this... this thread will be coming back up when its time to vote...... its all going to come back and haunt you...

It would probably be beneficial if there was a frank and clear discussion.

accymel 16-12-2006 20:19

Re: Stanley turn down Freedom of the Borough
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by KIPAX (Post 352875)
accymel... if it needs explaining :(

I think for point of arguement it does actually ? I know what he has done for Accrington Stanley btw:D

g jones 16-12-2006 20:19

Re: Stanley turn down Freedom of the Borough
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by KIPAX (Post 352876)
but he isnt in here is he... just you attacking him...

I am sorry. Eric launched a newspaper article against the council and Peter Britcliffe. It contained inacuracies.

KIPAX 16-12-2006 20:20

Re: Stanley turn down Freedom of the Borough
 
then argue back in the newspaper instead of making accusations on a messageboard :(

lancsdave 16-12-2006 20:29

Re: Stanley turn down Freedom of the Borough
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by KIPAX (Post 352882)
then argue back in the newspaper instead of making accusations on a messageboard :(


Does that mean anything that appears in the papers shouldn't be discussed in here ?

g jones 16-12-2006 20:31

Re: Stanley turn down Freedom of the Borough
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by KIPAX (Post 352882)
then argue back in the newspaper instead of making accusations on a messageboard :(

I think your right in the sense of a more open debate. The trouble is, it is in the hands of solicitors, and you are aware of the situation when that occurs.

Like I said in March?
1) Stanley should look at the feasability of a new ground compared to renovating the Crown

And I would add a second view...
2) In the current situation, it would be beneficial if the supporters club were involved in the discussions somehow. I can see much more progress for the club if that was to happen instead of the childish politiking that has dogged the discussions. I have not been involved in those discussions but get told second hand.

KIPAX 16-12-2006 20:39

Re: Stanley turn down Freedom of the Borough
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by lancsdave (Post 352887)
Does that mean anything that appears in the papers shouldn't be discussed in here ?

no why would it...???

mister jones here said he is doing all this because eric should expect a response because of what was in the paper.... i am saying the response should be in the paper.. not that it shouldnt be discussed...

yes? :)

KIPAX 16-12-2006 20:40

Re: Stanley turn down Freedom of the Borough
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by g jones (Post 352888)
I have not been involved in those discussions but get told second hand.


good grief man :(

cmonstanley 16-12-2006 22:08

Re: Stanley turn down Freedom of the Borough
 
:Banane26: :Banane26: :Banane26:vote for fraser the eagle i think we should get him to stand in the local elections :D :D :D :D :D might get more sense..


on a serious note i think if stanley move to whiteberk their wont be an accy stanley for long :mad:

KIPAX 16-12-2006 22:10

Re: Stanley turn down Freedom of the Borough
 
look at the post.. its a rumour by a journolist... why would you even think its possible? club has refuted it anyways :)


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:03.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com