Accrington Web

Accrington Web (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/index.php)
-   Accrington Stanley (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f93/)
-   -   Stanley v Mansfield (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f93/stanley-v-mansfield-27201.html)

Zero 30-12-2006 13:33

Stanley v Mansfield
 
Good luck to the lads today

Come on boys 3 points ESSENTIAL.

Sorry I can`t be up there we`re off to Congy shortly

Anyone know if there`s live coverage we might be able to get on the excuse for a radio in the van ?

COME ON STANLEY !!

:Banane08:

Kiwi John 30-12-2006 14:02

Re: Stanley v Mansfield
 
:eek: :eek: STRUTH, Jimmy Bell on the subs bench:eek: :eek: .Hope he gets one if forced to play.

Kiwi John 30-12-2006 14:08

Re: Stanley v Mansfield
 
1-0 Andy Todd...shades of Da je vu.

MikeA 30-12-2006 14:15

Re: Stanley v Mansfield
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kiwi John (Post 358117)
:eek: :eek: STRUTH, Jimmy Bell on the subs bench:eek: :eek: .Hope he gets one if forced to play.

It's Jimmy's son!

Kiwi John 30-12-2006 14:16

Re: Stanley v Mansfield
 
Doh !!!!!!!!!!!!

Kiwi John 30-12-2006 14:48

Re: Stanley v Mansfield
 
****** :( :(

Zero 30-12-2006 14:50

Re: Stanley v Mansfield
 
COME ON STANLEY !!

Gotta Go

Kiwi John 30-12-2006 14:54

Re: Stanley v Mansfield
 
Good luck ZERO

Haggis316 30-12-2006 15:00

Re: Stanley v Mansfield
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kiwi John (Post 358120)
1-0 Andy Todd...shades of Da je vu.


Yes but its only taken them till half time (the worst time to concede a goal) to equalise.

Kiwi John 30-12-2006 15:06

Re: Stanley v Mansfield
 
Abandoned eh. Do the fans get their money back?

Haggis316 30-12-2006 15:22

Re: Stanley v Mansfield
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kiwi John (Post 358138)
Abandoned eh. Do the fans get their money back?

In view of there being pay on the gate fans will presumably be issued with vouchers entitling them to attend the match when replayed.

Redraine 30-12-2006 15:31

Re: Stanley v Mansfield
 
Oh no there wasn't!
Pay again.

K.S.H 30-12-2006 15:46

Re: Stanley v Mansfield
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Haggis316 (Post 358148)
fans will presumably be issued with vouchers entitling them to attend the match when replayed.

We weren't issued with anything, pay again it looks like - what about season ticket holders, will they have to pay now they have used their ticket for this match?

Doug 30-12-2006 15:58

Re: Stanley v Mansfield
 
There's now't back. We'll be paying again. Pity about today, we could have taken them without to much effort. That goal of there's was a gift.

lancsdave 30-12-2006 16:02

Re: Stanley v Mansfield
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by K.S.H (Post 358157)
We weren't issued with anything, pay again it looks like - what about season ticket holders, will they have to pay now they have used their ticket for this match?

Season ticket holders will still get in for nothing, they should have a special voucher of some sort in their book.

If the club had any sense they would make the replayed match half price admission or risk alienating the fans.

Do those who pay on the turnstile not get issued with some form of ticket stub ?

Doug 30-12-2006 16:09

Re: Stanley v Mansfield
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by lancsdave (Post 358164)
Do those who pay on the turnstile not get issued with some form of ticket stub ?


No!

How did Burnley do Dave? :rolleyes:

accymel 30-12-2006 16:10

Re: Stanley v Mansfield
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by lancsdave (Post 358164)
Do those who pay on the turnstile not get issued with some form of ticket stub ?

Errr nope :( so be difficult to prove now aint that clever of the club:rolleyes:

accymel 30-12-2006 16:12

Re: Stanley v Mansfield
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Doug (Post 358168)
No!

How did Burnley do Dave? :rolleyes:

I wouldn't ask Doug :D & i bet he's hoping for a swimming pool at the Turf on NYD LOL:D

Doug 30-12-2006 16:14

Re: Stanley v Mansfield
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by accymel (Post 358172)
I wouldn't ask Doug :D & i bet he's hoping for a swimming pool at the Turf on NYD LOL:D

Don't you go soft on him, put the boot in. :D

KIPAX 30-12-2006 16:15

Re: Stanley v Mansfield
 
why would they give money back.. you got what you paid for.. a football match... nothing there to say how long it has to last for..

had it been postponed at 3pm that would ahve been a different story :)

accymel 30-12-2006 16:15

Re: Stanley v Mansfield
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Doug (Post 358174)
Don't you go soft on him, put the boot in. :D


I dont need too his own team did that :p :D hehehehe

lancsdave 30-12-2006 16:17

Re: Stanley v Mansfield
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Doug (Post 358168)
No!

How did Burnley do Dave? :rolleyes:

It's December we do what we do every season for the second half of it :)

lancsdave 30-12-2006 16:19

Re: Stanley v Mansfield
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by KIPAX (Post 358175)
why would they give money back.. you got what you paid for.. a football match... nothing there to say how long it has to last for..

had it been postponed at 3pm that would ahve been a different story :)


Always a contentious issue when games are abondoned. A football match lasts 90 minutes, did the paying fans see 90 mins ?

Customer relations comes in to play now, if the weather is dodgy in future how many fans will stay away if they think they aren't going to get a full game and no recompense ?

accymel 30-12-2006 16:19

Re: Stanley v Mansfield
 
How many actually braved it today attendance wise ?

Haggis316 30-12-2006 16:22

Re: Stanley v Mansfield
 
Must admit I was put off by the weather forecast for the 85 mile trip.

Having lived in Otley for 8 years some of the roads I know about and use are pretty exposed and minor.

Diesel 2 ways over 4 hours in the car and £15 for a 45 minute no result would have been a bit hard to take.

accymel 30-12-2006 16:23

Re: Stanley v Mansfield
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by lancsdave (Post 358179)
Customer relations comes in to play now, if the weather is dodgy in future how many fans will stay away if they think they aren't going to get a full game and no recompense ?

Like moi? with no ROOF & the weather as tempermental as it is, certainly heavy rain for past few days - there was no way i was risking flu for it & tbh im soo glad i didnt bother now i'd of wasted majority of my money for 45mins :rolleyes: - but yeh u have a good point cos this will make those that did brave it today consider it more if there is no continency plan for this occurance:rolleyes:

To be honest i didnt think it would be playable today as of yesterday

lancsdave 30-12-2006 16:24

Re: Stanley v Mansfield
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by accymel (Post 358183)
Like moi? with no ROOF & the weather as tempermental as it is, certainly heavy rain for past few days - there was no way i was risking flu for it & tbh im soo glad i didnt bother now:rolleyes: - but yeh u have a good point cos this will make those that did brave it today consider it more if there is no continency plan for this occurance:rolleyes:


You were lucky, I told you yesterday they would struggle with the pitch , at least I was half right :D

K.S.H 30-12-2006 16:25

Re: Stanley v Mansfield
 
Well I can't speak for everyone but when I go to a match I pay to watch two halves of it not one, if its lashing down like that again I want to see the pitch before I pay so I can make my mind up if I want to risk being thrown out at half time. People go to support their team in weather like this and yet their expected to pay again for it - well I aint

accymel 30-12-2006 16:26

Re: Stanley v Mansfield
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by lancsdave (Post 358185)
You were lucky, I told you yesterday they would struggle with the pitch , at least I was half right :D

Yes mystic Dave:D :D :D

KIPAX 30-12-2006 16:28

Re: Stanley v Mansfield
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by lancsdave (Post 358179)
Always a contentious issue when games are abondoned. A football match lasts 90 minutes, did the paying fans see 90 mins ?


Are you sure a football match lasts 90 minutes.. only by my reckoning todays lasted 45 so that kinda blows your argument out of the water doesn't it :)

Have a look how many other matches where abandoned today.. quite a few.... look on there websites or messageboards.. you dont get your money back.. Its not a stanley thing so no use having a go at the club people:..

accymel 30-12-2006 16:31

Re: Stanley v Mansfield
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by KIPAX (Post 358188)
Are you sure a football match lasts 90 minutes.. only by my reckoning todays lasted 45 so that kinda blows your argument out of the water doesn't it :)

Have a look how many other matches where abandoned today.. quite a few.... look on there websites or messageboards.. you dont get your money back.. Its not a stanley thing so no use having a go at the club people:..


No but for clubs like ours that relies on support i think something should be done than nothing - otherwise Coley & Eric have no right to have a go at stanley fans for lack of attendance certainly in crap weather:(

K.S.H 30-12-2006 16:35

Re: Stanley v Mansfield
 
So if you pay for a 90 min flight to France from Manchester and the plane lands at Heathrow cause the storms are too risky to travel in would you pay again for the remainder of your trip? :rolleyes:

KIPAX 30-12-2006 16:36

Re: Stanley v Mansfield
 
Your kidding? So we havent got much money.. it costs a fortune to put a match on.. but you want the club to lose money and let everyone in for half price because a match was abandoned.. something no other club will be doing... just accrington stanley..... dont hold yer breath dear :)

K.S.H 30-12-2006 16:37

Re: Stanley v Mansfield
 
Lets face it, the pitch was NO worse at half time than it was at kick off, if the ref says it was dangerous to continue the game should NEVER have been started in the first place

KIPAX 30-12-2006 16:38

Re: Stanley v Mansfield
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by K.S.H (Post 358192)
So if you pay for a 90 min flight to France from Manchester and the plane lands at Heathrow cause the storms are too risky to travel in would you pay again for the remainder of your trip? :rolleyes:

its a game of football not a flight.. and you can make any old thing up to compare badly.... so lets get on the same plane and....

if you pay for a 90 minute flight and it got you there 10 minutes early would you want a rebate? does your train or bus every get you there early and you ask for a rebate.

l

KIPAX 30-12-2006 16:39

Re: Stanley v Mansfield
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by K.S.H (Post 358194)
Lets face it, the pitch was NO worse at half time than it was at kick off, if the ref says it was dangerous to continue the game should NEVER have been started in the first place


i would agree with that... didnt seem any difference to me and i dont recall seeing him come out and give it an inspection at half time.

accymel 30-12-2006 16:39

Re: Stanley v Mansfield
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by KIPAX (Post 358193)
Your kidding? So we havent got much money.. it costs a fortune to put a match on.. but you want the club to lose money and let everyone in for half price because a match was abandoned.. something no other club will be doing... just accrington stanley..... dont hold yer breath dear :)


Who was that aiming at me or KSH? but to the point Kipax its a double edged sword tho isnt it - club will lose money on attendances when weather is crap cos simply fans like KSH will have paid out for a match thats not watchable for the full duration, so who is gonna risk it??? Cos im glad i didnt:rolleyes:

K.S.H 30-12-2006 16:40

Re: Stanley v Mansfield
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by KIPAX (Post 358195)
its a game of football not a flight.. and you can make any old thing up to compare badly.... so lets get on the same plane and....

if you pay for a 90 minute flight and it got you there 10 minutes early would you want a rebate? does your train or bus every get you there early and you ask for a rebate.

l

No but it takes me all the way and I don't have to pay twice :D

KIPAX 30-12-2006 16:40

Re: Stanley v Mansfield
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by accymel (Post 358190)
No but for clubs like ours that relies on support i think something should be done than nothing - otherwise Coley & Eric have no right to have a go at stanley fans for lack of attendance certainly in crap weather:(


eeerm wasnt they having a go at NONE stanley fans who dont attend matches.... why would they have a go at people who do attend?

cmonstanley 30-12-2006 16:41

Re: Stanley v Mansfield
 
why dont we make it mandatory at stanley. if the game is abandoned the replay is half price and make a big deal out of it and get good press a bit of spin ...stanley the family club....

cmonstanley 30-12-2006 16:48

Re: Stanley v Mansfield
 
give stanley the braaging rights tell other people our club are not like the money grabbing rip off merchants like blackburn and burnley something positive can come out of this make a big noise in the local paperseven if it just attracts 40 extra people thats a good chance at least 7 people will come back its about building support;)

Haggis316 30-12-2006 16:49

Re: Stanley v Mansfield
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by K.S.H (Post 358192)
So if you pay for a 90 min flight to France from Manchester and the plane lands at Heathrow cause the storms are too risky to travel in would you pay again for the remainder of your trip? :rolleyes:

Is this a good analogy? When storms delayed our flight from Orlando causing us to miss our Manchester connection at Atlanta Delta Airlines didn't just put us on a replacement flight next day at no extra cost they put all 17 of us up in a plush hotel - again at no extra cost.

accymel 30-12-2006 16:52

Re: Stanley v Mansfield
 
Looking on fishy site i cant find any clauses or disclaimers with regard to abandoned matches etc? Unless im missing something, surely if it isnt there then it should or is it a review when it suits matter??

Kiwi John 30-12-2006 16:55

Re: Stanley v Mansfield
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by lancsdave (Post 358164)
If the club had any sense they would make the replayed match half price admission or risk alienating the fans.

Thats a bloody good idea.Win/win for everyone.

stanleyfan 30-12-2006 16:58

Re: Stanley v Mansfield
 
i think that stanley played quite well in the conditions, and i think that David Brown is gunna be starting for stanley alot more this season. Paul and David work well together. I also think that rikki Baines looks very strong, abit like welsh....

shame about ti being called off.

They should have given us tickets so we could get in half price at the replay.

Haggis316 30-12-2006 17:03

Re: Stanley v Mansfield
 
Wait a minute.

We are not just contracting with some impersonal supplier for 90 minutes entertainment.

This is Stanley we are talking about. Every £1 we spend with the club is used to progress things.

stanleyfan 30-12-2006 17:05

Re: Stanley v Mansfield
 
alot of people who live in accrington are not the richest of people.
I for one will go to the replay but... might think twice about going to a match if its raining.

KIPAX 30-12-2006 17:09

Re: Stanley v Mansfield
 
Have a guess how many stanley games have been postponed or called off due to rain in the last 10 yrs.. and some of you are thinking twice about coming..

KiTChener 30-12-2006 17:09

Re: Stanley v Mansfield
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by K.S.H (Post 358194)
Lets face it, the pitch was NO worse at half time than it was at kick off, if the ref says it was dangerous to continue the game should NEVER have been started in the first place

Agree with you there.... certainly no worse at half time, although I was a bit wetter, despite my Christmas present of a new Stanley cagoule like thingy!!

IMHO, it's same for both sides, nothing actually dangerous, but, I look forward to replay, when we may have a full squad to choose from.........

And Rob in goal???

& BTW, I don't care if I have to pay again!! I look upon it as a 'bonus' game!!

Happy New Year to all!!

KiTChener 30-12-2006 17:21

Re: Stanley v Mansfield
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by KIPAX (Post 358209)
Have a guess how many stanley games have been postponed or called off due to rain in the last 10 yrs.. and some of you are thinking twice about coming..

As a relative 'newcomer' ( I am now in my fifth season) I do not recall any game being abandond (can't think how to spell this correctly!).... in fact, I can only recall one game when we got absolutely p***ed wet through... I think it was the pre-season Burnley friendly, if I remember rightly, a couple of years ago.

C'mon, you lot, I'd rather have a team than a roof.... buy yourselves a Stanley cagoule like thingy....
it might not be 100% weatherproof, but it certainly helped today!!

Kiwi John 30-12-2006 17:24

Re: Stanley v Mansfield
 
Abandoned :)

stanleyfan 30-12-2006 17:26

Re: Stanley v Mansfield
 
when was the last time you went to PNE kipax....

cmonstanley 30-12-2006 17:32

Re: Stanley v Mansfield
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Haggis316 (Post 358207)
Wait a minute.

We are not just contracting with some impersonal supplier for 90 minutes entertainment.

This is Stanley we are talking about. Every £1 we spend with the club is used to progress things.

they would have budgted for todays match so the replay will be bonus money we are trying to attract support not everybody in accy thinks the same way as you but if we can attract a few more and get the m thinking like you we will get more money in the long run its called forward thinking even in business you cant take your money and run, you have to build up your sale base..

cmonstanley 30-12-2006 17:34

Re: Stanley v Mansfield
 
plus the extra people we will attract will make oup for the loss on the night

KIPAX 30-12-2006 17:34

Re: Stanley v Mansfield
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by stanleyfan (Post 358235)
when was the last time you went to PNE kipax....


End of last season I think... at home to Leeds in the playoffs... Took my daughter.... How is that relevant to accy v mansfield...

KiTChener 30-12-2006 17:35

Re: Stanley v Mansfield
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by cmonstanley (Post 358242)
they would have budgted for todays match so the replay will be bonus money we are trying to attract support not everybody in accy thinks the same way as you but if we can attract a few more and get the m thinking like you we will get more money in the long run its called forward thinking even in business you cant take your money and run, you have to build up your sale base..

See fishy site... reduced prices promised

KIPAX 30-12-2006 17:37

Re: Stanley v Mansfield
 
looks like its gonna be cheaper for the replay anyway so all that moaning for nothing eh people :)

K.S.H 30-12-2006 17:39

Re: Stanley v Mansfield
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by KiTChener (Post 358246)
reduced prices promised

Well done Stanley :D, sods law now i'll be on nights :mad:

Doug 30-12-2006 17:41

Re: Stanley v Mansfield
 
I respect the argument put forward but personally I wasn’t that ****ed off after an 80 mile round trip, I enjoyed the first half and despite the last minute **** up, and it was a **** up, we would have taken three points today.

As for the early finish I knew it was going to rain heavily and I knew there was a chance of it being called off or abandoned. I came and paid to watch my club play football and that what I got, as well as getting ****ed wet through. I don’t mind if I have to pay again.

I thought the lads played well with plenty of grunt and exciting play, the water sport element added to the flavour. The referee made a bad call in my opinion, as people have said the pitch was no worse after the first so play could have continued.

Mel, you’re a lazy sod.

Just seen the bit on the reduction for the replay. Well done the club.

K.S.H 30-12-2006 17:42

Re: Stanley v Mansfield
 
Hang on, Hang on,
I take everything back I've said, I WILL PAY on the night cause I just checked the gold bond weekly draw and I've won £100 :Banane11: :Banane44:

cmonstanley 30-12-2006 17:44

Re: Stanley v Mansfield
 
now lets advertise ite get a big piece in local papers strike while the iron is hot attract new supporters:Banane13: :Banane13: plus get three points the plus points about todays match we were playing like a unit and keeping the shape of our team till the mistake in defence............

Haggis316 30-12-2006 17:46

Re: Stanley v Mansfield
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Doug (Post 358249)
after an 80 mile round trip, I enjoyed the first half

85 each way ie 170 miles in total.

Doug 30-12-2006 17:48

Re: Stanley v Mansfield
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by K.S.H (Post 358251)
Hang on, Hang on,
I take everything back I've said, I WILL PAY on the night cause I just checked the gold bond weekly draw and I've won £100 :Banane11: :Banane44:


Well done KSH. I'll sign myself up for next week. :)

KiTChener 30-12-2006 17:48

Re: Stanley v Mansfield
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by KIPAX (Post 358247)
looks like its gonna be cheaper for the replay anyway so all that moaning for nothing eh people :)

Don't know why they're moaning.... today was entertaining, next game will also be... why should it be cheaper??

I remember, many years ago, watching Man C playing Luton Town at Maine Road... similar conditions to today.... City were 6-2 up at half ime, & believe it or not, Denis Law had scored all 6!!!

Then The Ref abandoned game!!

Later in the season, City lost 1-3 in the re-arranged fixture!!

At least we have a chance of a full squad when we next play them!!

cmonstanley 30-12-2006 17:49

Re: Stanley v Mansfield
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Doug (Post 358249)
I respect the argument put forward but personally I wasn’t that ****ed off after an 80 mile round trip, I enjoyed the first half and despite the last minute **** up, and it was a **** up, we would have taken three points today.

As for the early finish I knew it was going to rain heavily and I knew there was a chance of it being called off or abandoned. I came and paid to watch my club play football and that what I got, as well as getting ****ed wet through. I don’t mind if I have to pay again.

I thought the lads played well with plenty of grunt and exciting play, the water sport element added to the flavour. The referee made a bad call in my opinion, as people have said the pitch was no worse after the first so play could have continued.

Mel, you’re a lazy sod.

Just seen the bit on the reduction for the replay. Well done the club.

if only everybody in accy thought like you but they dont so if we only attract an extre 40 people it would 40 extra people spreading the gospel..:D

Doug 30-12-2006 17:50

Re: Stanley v Mansfield
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Haggis316 (Post 358253)
85 each way ie 170 miles in total.


:confused: Not a criticism, I was making my point like everyone else.

The only one who might like to take it as a criticism? Is the dodgy bird who didn’t want to get her hair wet. :D

Redraine 30-12-2006 17:53

Re: Stanley v Mansfield
 
C'mon everyone - the pitch was definitely deteriorating as the game went on. Much as I was fed up at the time I still wouldn't mind paying again as long as Stanley continue to give 110% as they did today. 45 minutes of Stanley is better than 90 at some grounds I could care to mention.:D
The game had become a lottery - Mansfield's goal would never have happened without the ball stopping short of Dunbavin's rushing out to an attempted clearance, even if the defender ( Richardson?) was daft to try the pack-pass.
Young Jay Harris reminds me more of Anthony Barry every time I see him - what a battler!

Doug 30-12-2006 17:54

Re: Stanley v Mansfield
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by cmonstanley (Post 358257)
if only everybody in accy thought like you but they dont so if we only attract an extre 40 people it would 40 extra people spreading the gospel..:D

If you saw how I was dressed you’d think again. I have a cupboard full of specialist walking gear designed to keep me warm and dry and I turned up dressed for the flu.

KIPAX 30-12-2006 17:55

Re: Stanley v Mansfield
 
Harris is coming on more and more.. Was it Harris who took that instant shot on the volley just outside the penalty area... seems to be getting better every game for me :)

KiTChener 30-12-2006 17:57

Re: Stanley v Mansfield
 
the plus points about todays match we were playing like a unit and keeping the shape of our team till the mistake in defence......

Got to agree with you there.....
Although Ian D gained us a point against Bury, if today's game had continued, I feel he may have lost us two, if not three..... sorry, I think Rob should be given an extended run........ otherwise, he's back to Charlton, & where will that leave us??

S**t, I vowed never to criticise individual performances, as I could never do better..... sorry Ian.

Redraine 30-12-2006 18:03

Re: Stanley v Mansfield
 
[quote=KiTChener;358265] Ian D gained us a point against Bury, if today's game had continued, I feel he may have lost us two, if not three.....

Why - what did he do wrong today? Surely you're not blaming him for the goal?

lancsdave 30-12-2006 18:07

Re: Stanley v Mansfield
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by cmonstanley (Post 358201)
give stanley the braaging rights tell other people our club are not like the money grabbing rip off merchants like blackburn and burnley

Think you will find thats rubbish. Burnley had a game abandoned not too long ago. They gave half refund to those who paid ( because they had tickets stubs to prove they were at the game ) and then made the re-arranged game half price to everyone. Think you will find that is less money grabbing than the one Stanley are proposing which is pay in full and then some more if you go to the re-arranged game.

Haggis316 30-12-2006 18:08

Re: Stanley v Mansfield
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Doug (Post 358259)
:confused: Not a criticism, I was making my point like everyone else. :D

Thanks though I didn't take it as such. Just making the point as to how bad it would have been.

cmonstanley 30-12-2006 18:10

Re: Stanley v Mansfield
 
you cant blame ian dunbavin for the goal .you should never attempt a back pass when the pitch was in that state youv seen enough goals like that on match of the day.

Haggis316 30-12-2006 18:11

Re: Stanley v Mansfield
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Redraine (Post 358261)
The game had become a lottery - Mansfield's goal would never have happened without the ball stopping short

Mansfield Manager said as much.

http://www.mansfieldtoday.co.uk/View...icleID=1951023

cmonstanley 30-12-2006 18:17

Re: Stanley v Mansfield
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by lancsdave (Post 358271)
Think you will find thats rubbish. Burnley had a game abandoned not too long ago. They gave half refund to those who paid ( because they had tickets stubs to prove they were at the game ) and then made the re-arranged game half price to everyone. Think you will find that is less money grabbing than the one Stanley are proposing which is pay in full and then some more if you go to the re-arranged game.

well lets look at the attendances compared to stanley and burnley:Banane51: burnley could afford to do that they know they would be garuanteed makin the same money or plus stanley cant they are taking a risk proving they are not money grabbing rip off merchants like those in the higher leagues .power to the people get your bums down to the fes :Banane51: :D

lancsdave 30-12-2006 18:19

Re: Stanley v Mansfield
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by cmonstanley (Post 358284)
well lets look at the attendances compared to stanley and burnley:Banane51: burnley could afford to do that they know they would be garuanteed makin the same money or plus stanley cant they are taking a risk proving they are not money grabbing rip off merchants like those in the higher leagues .power to the people get your bums down to the fes :Banane51: :D

Going back to my original point it's all down to customer relations. As Kipax pointed out there is no legal obligation on a club to make refunds. Burnley can afford it no more than Stanley can, attendances are only relative to running costs just the same and we have higher paid prima donnas than you have
:D

AccyMad 30-12-2006 18:24

Re: Stanley v Mansfield
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by lancsdave (Post 358288)
Going back to my original point it's all down to customer relations. As Kipax pointed out there is no legal obligation on a club to make refunds. Burnley can afford it no more than Stanley can, attendances are only relative to running costs just the same and we have higher paid prima donnas than you have
:D

At last a Burnley fan I can agree with :p

maccawozzagod 30-12-2006 18:27

Re: Stanley v Mansfield
 
from my point of view, the re-arranged game is an opportunity to give back to the fans. The club have paid todays costs via receiving full pay on the gate. The replay should be an opportunity to get some valuable Google Page Ranking, and score big brownie points via the press by offering a cost covering price. By no means do I mean this should be the price or this is the cost of hosting a match but charging a fiver a head and getting 3000 in would go a lot further than charging a tenner and getting 1000. Use the opportunity wisely please ASFC, these type of opportunities do not come around often. I believe that season ticket holders will pay no extra for the game whatsoever, if this is the case then why should anybody else?

cmonstanley 30-12-2006 18:30

Re: Stanley v Mansfield
 
:D same here. i dont know how they can justifie their wages because there isnt that big a bridge in class through the leagues apart from ronaldo and the odd few players. all down to murdoch the dictator a few years ago everybody said they wouldnt watch pay per view now they have been brainwashed into it its time to give the game back to the people and stanley are the club to do it...

K.S.H 30-12-2006 18:36

Re: Stanley v Mansfield
 
Exactly Macca, and the most annoying thing about it is the pitch didn't get any worse at half time, thats my gripe about it, if it was fit to play at 3pm it was fit to carry on playing on, i'm not saying it was, personally I think the game should never have started, I think the club realise this and thats why they are doing something about it

cmonstanley 30-12-2006 18:41

Re: Stanley v Mansfield
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by maccawozzagod (Post 358302)
from my point of view, the re-arranged game is an opportunity to give back to the fans. The club have paid todays costs via receiving full pay on the gate. The replay should be an opportunity to get some valuable Google Page Ranking, and score big brownie points via the press by offering a cost covering price. By no means do I mean this should be the price or this is the cost of hosting a match but charging a fiver a head and getting 3000 in would go a lot further than charging a tenner and getting 1000. Use the opportunity wisely please ASFC, these type of opportunities do not come around often. I believe that season ticket holders will pay no extra for the game whatsoever, if this is the case then why should anybody else?

agree with you 100% get a piece in local radio and local rags .:Banane26:

Rochdalecol 30-12-2006 18:44

Re: Stanley v Mansfield
 
In all fairness, Rochdale had a infamous abandonment at h/t vs Grimsby. Vouchers were issued while leaving ground entitling people to receive half price admission to the re-arranged game.

Those who could not make the re-arranged game could then send in their voucher prior to the new date and get a refund.

On the night, no voucher and you pay full whack

KIPAX 30-12-2006 18:50

Re: Stanley v Mansfield
 
http://www.kipax.com/mbgfx/splash.jpg

K.S.H 30-12-2006 19:14

Re: Stanley v Mansfield
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by KIPAX (Post 358344)

Bit of ice and the ball would have rolled no problem :rolleyes:

Doug 30-12-2006 19:19

Re: Stanley v Mansfield
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by KIPAX (Post 358344)


It was wetter on the Clayton end......:D Can't beat a nice action shot. :)

Bagpuss 30-12-2006 19:45

Re: Stanley v Mansfield
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Doug (Post 358405)
It was wetter on the Clayton end......:D Can't beat a nice action shot. :)

Look at all those softies under cover Doug, what's a bit of water.

Doug 30-12-2006 19:53

Re: Stanley v Mansfield
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Bagpuss (Post 358437)
Look at all those softies under cover Doug, what's a bit of water.

They won't want to stand there when we get a roo, there's no "f in roof"

It might be an idea to raise to pitch a little and put some back drains in so the water runs off to the Car Park not the centre of the park. I know today was a rare one off, but if our winters are going to get wetter we'll need to do something....

accymel 30-12-2006 20:00

Re: Stanley v Mansfield
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Doug (Post 358249)
Mel, you’re a lazy sod.
The only one who might like to take it as a criticism? Is the dodgy bird who didn’t want to get her hair wet. :D


OI!!! u cheeky ****ing get!!! No i dont want the flu spoiling my new year, plus after the thought of possibly being abandoned due to the weather - what is the point - have i missed owt other than getting ****ed wet through:confused: hopefully the re-scheduled one will have better weather:rolleyes: so what bit does that make me a lazy get???? I go to more matches than some people out there as much as i can afford & i stand in the clayton end under the sky - plus 2 matches a week is hard on the finances - i love the club but gee i got to ****ing live Y'know - & thats what some of u lot forget that some people cant afford to support the club as No 1 in your life - & thats just not that at all feesable for some!

There Dougies in the doghouse now:p

Doug 30-12-2006 20:07

Re: Stanley v Mansfield
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by accymel (Post 358445)
OI!!! u cheeky ****ing get!!! No i dont want the flu spoiling my new year, plus after the thought of possibly being abandoned due to the weather - what is the point - have i missed owt other than getting ****ed wet through:confused: hopefully the re-scheduled one will have better weather:rolleyes: so what bit does that make me a lazy get???? I go to more matches than some people out there as much as i can afford & i stand in the clayton end under the sky - plus 2 matches a week is hard on the finances - i love the club but gee i got to ****ing live Y'know - & thats what some of u lot forget that some people cant afford to support the club as No 1 in your life - & thats just not that at all feesable for some!

There Dougies in the doghouse now:p


**** me! :eek:

lancsdave 30-12-2006 20:11

Re: Stanley v Mansfield
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Doug (Post 358451)
**** me! :eek:

Blimey thats a bit forward :rolleyes:

Doug 30-12-2006 20:13

Re: Stanley v Mansfield
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by lancsdave (Post 358457)
Blimey thats a bit forward :rolleyes:


No it was a "**** me" :eek:. Not a "**** me" :D ........:)

Wynonie Harris 30-12-2006 20:47

Re: Stanley v Mansfield
 
Well, I enjoyed myself this afternoon. Had a good crack with my mates on the Clayton End and I thought the way the team played (as far as conditions allowed) was very encouraging. And I'm really looking forward to the replay!

Chimer 30-12-2006 22:48

Re: Stanley v Mansfield
 
Obviously time to raise the stakes. Let's go for a roof over the whole thing, not just the Clayton end :)

KIPAX 30-12-2006 22:54

Re: Stanley v Mansfield
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chimer (Post 358536)
Obviously time to raise the stakes. Let's go for a roof over the whole thing, not just the Clayton end :)


I am getting the word.....retracting... :)

a_ndy 30-12-2006 23:40

Re: Stanley v Mansfield
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by KiTChener (Post 358227)
As a relative 'newcomer' ( I am now in my fifth season) I do not recall any game being abandond (can't think how to spell this correctly!).... in fact, I can only recall one game when we got absolutely p***ed wet through... I think it was the pre-season Burnley friendly, if I remember rightly, a couple of years ago.

C'mon, you lot, I'd rather have a team than a roof.... buy yourselves a Stanley cagoule like thingy....
it might not be 100% weatherproof, but it certainly helped today!!


I'm in my 17th season and in all that time today was the first game to be abandoned! That said, I think the drainage has got progressively worse over the last 5 seasons. I've seen games played in far worse weather than todays and the pitch has held up ok.

longballking 31-12-2006 00:10

Re: Stanley v Mansfield
 
I agree with all the previous posts and the mansfield manager about the pitch.
If it wasn't fit to play the second half on, then it wasn't fit to play on at 3 o'clock as it hadn't got any worse. We shouldn't moan (too much) as the mansfield fans lost their money and had a two hour trip home on top of it. What i did notice was that although the conditions were bad we played the ball on the deck more today then we have in the last few weeks. Bizarre!

Shurm 31-12-2006 07:56

Re: Stanley v Mansfield
 
I'm sure the ref must have made an inspection of the pitch before the game ? If so he must have been pretty brave to call an end to it at half time because it does sort of bring his earlier decision to play the game into question. Soon as I heard the news I felt for the fans who had paid and will have to pay again I think some gesture from the club would be welcomed at this time of year however as mentioned its not there fault either.

Shurm 31-12-2006 09:59

Re: Stanley v Mansfield
 
Just seen Stanley Site regarding reduced admission :D nice one.

Hope You All Have A Happy New Year :D

lancsdave 31-12-2006 10:16

Re: Stanley v Mansfield
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Shurm (Post 358609)
I'm sure the ref must have made an inspection of the pitch before the game ? If so he must have been pretty brave to call an end to it at half time because it does sort of bring his earlier decision to play the game into question. Soon as I heard the news I felt for the fans who had paid and will have to pay again I think some gesture from the club would be welcomed at this time of year however as mentioned its not there fault either.


It's not that simple. Yes he will have inspected the pitch before the game. However he also has to try and second guess ( with some help from the groundsman) how much the pitch will stand up to more rain during the match, and how persistent the rain will be. It's quite feasible for the pitch to be okay at 3pm and not fit 45 minutes later, especially when it starts cutting up and the water then stays on top. Quite a few refs were caught out by it yesterday, and watching the championship this morning quite a few more wouldn't have lasted much longer.

Ironically the rain stopped just after the game was abandoned !!


All times are GMT. The time now is 23:06.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com