Re: Not Happy
 

Done with pride.:rolleyes:

Re: Not Happy
 

Thats better Bagpuss:D dont least a mindless plonk tell u different :D

Re: Not Happy
 

NICE ONE:D only thing left now is the answer to the question a number of us are asking " WHERE'S THE THREAD GONE !!!!!!":D

Re: Not Happy
 

Met him once and he seemed like a nice chappie, I really don't have a problem with him but if he was Russell (Do you know who I am) Whalley that would be different.:mad:

Re: Not Happy
 

and what was it all about!!!

Re: Not Happy
 

MMmmm thread deleted due to bad language :confused: erm no bad language as far as i could see on that thread tho:confused:

Re: Not Happy
 

Where did you get that from Mel?I Know There Was No Bad Language In That Thread!!!!and if so is the usual procedure not to stick it in over 18's???:)

Re: Not Happy
 

Look at Post no 32 MT on this thread :confused:

Re: Not Happy
 

I think we all need to calm down and remember that this is just a forum.

I deleted mthead's post above due to the content of bad language, as outlined in the thread I have included.

Apparently, a senior moderator deleted the Wimbledon thread before it became silly and a general slanging match. That's it. No conspiracy. Nobody being banned. No bad feelings.

Let's face it. By tomorrow afternoon we'll all be concentrating on more important matters than this. :)

Re: Not Happy
 

BoBody.......now there is a name that I haven't seen. I'm glad you named him!! BUT who is he?? :D:D

Re: Not Happy
 

Re: Not Happy
 

Fair do's,but the Wimbledon thread slanging match all started when a certain person slagged Bagpuss for something in his signature,which was totally out of the blue and no provocation,and the person is in a position of someone who should know better.Thats the bit what we are questioning as well as the deleting of the thread.Has the person in question got told he was wrong to do this in a position that he holds??:confused:

Re: Not Happy
 

Nice smiley ( frowny) weather changes you'll stick like that. ;)

Re: Not Happy
 

Well this is sad, just goes to show how people can get things so wrong.
It was I who removed the Wimbledon thread from the Stanley forums. The reason for doing so was because one of our well needed moderators had inadvertently compromised their identity and as some volunteer mods wish to remain anonymous then this really needed to be corrected, I’m sure most of you would understand without me having to explain, imagine if you were the volunteer you'll find it's often not a thankful job.

The thread in question was probably posted with good intention but from the word go members moaned about it being in the wrong forums and suggested that they were probably only spamming and therefore shouldn’t really be here, also members had a quiet unnecessary dig at the moderators and as a result prompted a reaction.
In total the thread had become trashed and with the privacy concern it was better/ simpler to just remove the thread rather than edit/ remove individual posts which would have generated complaints similar to what we have here.

I’ve said this before, if anyone has any complaint about moderator’s actions or what ever then contact admin, better doing that than creating new threads like this pointing the finger at the wrong mod and getting it wrong as we seam to have here.

Have a great day.

:)

Re: Not Happy
 

Well glad you made things clear Len.. and at the end of the day bagpuss is a scouser.. so no harm done! :)