![]() |
Re: David Brown
Quote:
|
Re: David Brown
and apparently it cost five hundred quid?
|
Re: David Brown
Bulls bollocks from the Hereford forum:-
"No surprise there really. Only surprise for me was that Twatrington bothered to appeal at all. I like Browner he gave his all here and still has a fair amount of ability but regardless of where it happened on the pitch he made no attempt to play the ball and viscously kicked Danny Thomas as he went past. Straight red for violent conduct ......spot on. " Viscously? How do you do that?<!--msgend--> |
Re: David Brown
that must mean it was a sticky tackle?
|
Re: David Brown
We should have blamed the pitch.
|
Re: David Brown
Having watched the incident several times,seemed like a clear 'hack down from behind' to me.Can't understand what the fuss is all about. ???
|
Re: David Brown
Quote:
|
Re: David Brown
I'll stand corrected but I always thought that by bringing someone down like that WAS deemed an act of violence,therefore the big red.
As I say I'll stand corrected. |
Re: David Brown
Quote:
Dangerous play though, no way, three matches is far too harsh, but resistance is useless. :) This last man bit is getting a bit irksome, since when could you not be sent off unless the goalie was the nearest player? :confused: |
Re: David Brown
Seems to be confusion about him being sent off because he was last man. The technical term for that is preventing a goal scoring opportunity and carries a 2 match ban. In this case it seems irrelevant if he was deemed last man because thats not what he was sent off for, in the opinion of the referee of course.
|
Re: David Brown
Quote:
|
Re: David Brown
Graham Turner does not think he should have been sent off. See:
http://www.herefordtimes.com/display.var.1294013.0..php |
All times are GMT. The time now is 01:38. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com