![]() |
Moneys to tight to mention
With all the speculation floating about at the moment i was just wondering if 99% of people on hear are/would still be against the devil itself 'myfootballclub' being interested in adding 50,000 fans/intersted people to the clubs fanbase.
|
Re: Moneys to tight to mention
this thing is all about a profit making scheme thats why they say its an investment all investor companys asset strip.so theyll probably sell all the players the rights to the name and sell the ground to build houses on most investors would want profit return.if its not that well probably read in the papers a couple of months down the line.footbal fans caught in idiotic fraud scam:rolleyes::rolleyes:just because its in the media doesnt mean its legit remember robert maxwell:rolleyes:
|
Re: Moneys to tight to mention
I'd like to think that Eric would keep the fans of this club posted with developments regarding the ownership of the club. Maybe, by the recent releases to the media he is signalling that the time is right for him to step aside:confused:
No one can underestimate the herculean task EW has had, raising this club from the obscurity of the Unibond league to the heights it has reached now. I, like many others ,thank him for those efforts. But with regard to selling out to a debatable consortium such as this, If the time has indeed come for Eric to hand the reins to someone else, be it an individual or consortium, I'd hope they'd have the best interests of the club and it's fans as their No 1 priority. With what I've read about this Myfootball business, I have grave doubts.:( |
Re: Moneys to tight to mention
Contrary to the characterization of MyFC as "the devil itself," I'd be very happy to answer any questions about MyFC. The posts I've read here and elsewhere suggest that there are huge misperceptions about what MyFC can and will do to whichever club it purchases
For example, the post suggesting we'd simply buy a club to strip it of its players and make a profit in development is totally based on false rumors. By definition, the MyFC trust which will purchase a club is a not-for-profit entity. The individual members can never profit from the enterprise, which means our only motivation is to keep the club going and growing stronger. Let me repeat, individually we are prevented BY LAW from profiting on the club. All the profits the club makes go right back into the club's growth. I'm sure there are other misunderstandings about MyFC also. I'm not a member of the management team and can only speak for myself, but I have studied the legal terms and conditions of MyFC and know what the trust can and will be able to do and what it absolutely cannot do. Before you paint us as "the devil," please take the time at least to understand accurately what you are condemning. |
Re: Moneys to tight to mention
If the options in the poll reflect the quality of the scheme, then it is certainly best avoided. If the poll organiser really wants to sound opinion, sensible options should be offered rather than the "loaded" and emotive ones here.
|
Re: Moneys to tight to mention
Quote:
I just setup the poll for supporters opinions, i have in fact signed up for myfc and chose stanley as a possible target. I made the poll options from hearing thoughts on here being aired. I do not work for myfc. Therfore the crap poll options in your articulate words should not be misrepresented of any myfc representitives. |
Re: Moneys to tight to mention
Quote:
|
Re: Moneys to tight to mention
Quote:
|
Re: Moneys to tight to mention
500000 supportter other night will also form
|
Re: Moneys to tight to mention
Quote:
|
Re: Moneys to tight to mention
sorry
50,000 Fans Will Be Generated OverNight If We Were To Be Took Over |
Re: Moneys to tight to mention
Quote:
|
Re: Moneys to tight to mention
no but you would become intrested in that club and be concerned about its welfare also you would have a soft spot and some of those members would become part-time supporters.. i sometimes go to blackburn games does that make me a fan ? .. face it the club is in need of a investor and this could be a good thing or a bad thing .. i personally would prefer ilayis khan (spelling ? ) to be involed in any takeover as he is a genuine fan as im sure many of you agree and he himselfs admin it's time to step over eric. a legend in the name of stanley a era has ended.
|
Re: Moneys to tight to mention
I define a fan as someone who likes/enjoys the subject that they are a fan of ie. a football fan may enjoy watching a particular club on tv and wish them to win everything they can or may just play football in the park/on the street etc. Many English and some British people are fans of Tim Henman
I would say a supporter is someone who contributes something to the cause of which they are a fan of. This would generally mean some one who pays money at the gate to watch their team or buys the merchandise/ takes part in fund raising/ gives their time freely, or cheaply to ensure the object of their desire can continue to exist and hopefully acheive success. Most of us cannot say we have supported Tim Henman based on this definition. Am I right or wrong |
All times are GMT. The time now is 00:38. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com