Accrington Web

Accrington Web (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/index.php)
-   Accrington Stanley (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f93/)
-   -   V Barnet (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f93/v-barnet-45084.html)

VALAIRIAN 25-01-2009 16:41

Re: V Barnet
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MCR ADIM (Post 672201)
Posted via Mobile Devicethis bored is full of negativity! Someone posts about rocky comein back from injury and all the posts were very negative! Post about running the club negative! No wonder the club took it off the site its a joke!!!

MCR It is not always just negativity, its just peoples opinions - thats what forums are for!! Do not take it all to heart, lets face it the club are not interested in what we think thats why they will put the seats where they want and sell the players that we(most of us) like.

Chimer 25-01-2009 16:47

Re: V Barnet
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ukcowboy (Post 672229)
Well ****** off elsewhere then ya muppet. How many times do you rose tinted glasses brigade need telling?this club is its own worse enemy and untill Mr Whalley sells up it always will be. Yes He has done a great deal in the time if has been here but face up to reality please He is out of his depth now and needs to go now before things get worse.
Posted via Mobile Device

No - an under-supported club is out of its depth due to the run of Whalley-funded / Coleman-managed against-the-odds successes that got us where we are now. With the exception of his appalling grasp of the art of public relations, Eric is more likely out of funds than out of his depth, and, especially in the present climate, nobody else is likely to throw serious money Stanley's way with no realistic hope of any financial return.

I don't think things are great, I just think they're probably as good as they're going to get, and I'm just enjoying it while it lasts. If that makes me a member of the rose-tinteds, so be it.

VALAIRIAN 25-01-2009 17:28

Re: V Barnet
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chimer (Post 672245)
No - an under-supported club is out of its depth due to the run of Whalley-funded / Coleman-managed against-the-odds successes that got us where we are now. With the exception of his appalling grasp of the art of public relations, Eric is more likely out of funds than out of his depth, and, especially in the present climate, nobody else is likely to throw serious money Stanley's way with no realistic hope of any financial return.

I don't think things are great, I just think they're probably as good as they're going to get, and I'm just enjoying it while it lasts. If that makes me a member of the rose-tinteds, so be it.

I don't think things are great, I just think they're probably as good as they're going to get, and I'm just enjoying it while it lasts. If that makes me a member of the rose-tinteds, so be it.

Like the last bit Chimer! Agree totally, but if this is a true reflection - money being tight - why not let us know and explain it rather than going on about poor support????

fc:stanley 26-01-2009 00:14

Re: V Barnet
 
Calm Down , Calm Down (In my best scouse accent) ;)


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:42.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com