Re: FOA Bagpuss
 

Who tagged this topic? :-)

Re: FOA Bagpuss
 

Well said Roy, i was waiting for you to comment on this subject, if the club had any issues as anybody else there is a pm system or even mail the admin should there be any serious problems, i know Roy is very aware of any legal implications cos it doesnt effect the club but himself more. I know both baggy & SR reasonably well, & having talked to both seperately, both are passionate with their point of view but mutually they have the club at heart. Think Baggy particulary is made a scape goat, because he does voice his point of view as he sees it - regardless of whether its the populas view or not but that is his view agreed with or not. Baggy come to the osc meeting, SR makes regular appearance & think a good opportunity for both of u & soon see whether the views can be acted appropiately on - just a suggestion lol!!

I have spoken my views on here & with the club people, i do beleive the club still needs to connect more with the fans & listen with hope to rectify problems such as whats voiced on this board, big reason why fans come on here to air their views is because they have tried in vain to speak to the club & yet have felt or appeared to be ignored by least not trying to act on issues - that is the pinnacle reason for the views on message board & a causation from the club itself, is IMHO, seems its one way street rather than take the good with the bad from the message board. Trust me many great ideas, insight to fans opinion & a great opportunity for the club to know whats good whats bad within the club & service, makes it a damn sight easier to pinpoint the problem areas to correct & keep it up with the good areas. The amusing thing is that if the club want something or need help, they come here but once a problem arises, its 'oh winging fans' bury head in sand attitude, message board is rubbish etc, but thats my point of view.

Re: FOA Bagpuss
 

I already know but others are still in the dark please post a link to the offending thread so everybody can have a read.;)

"Give us the old gree" you started this up again by posting some crap about slander, I see no evidence, please provide some for us all and for Roy in case he has to get his legal team on it.:rolleyes:

THE LINK WAS REMOVED BECAUSE CERTAIN PEOPLE WHERE BEING MADE TO LOOK AMATUER AND SHIRKED THEIR RESPONSIBILITIES, NOTHING TO DO WITH SLANDER.:(

Re: FOA Bagpuss
 

The first and the last? ;)

Re: FOA Bagpuss
 

No matter how many times I read this thread I can't help but obsess with the grammatical error FOA, insstead of FAO.

Anybody else?

Re: FOA Bagpuss
 

I spotted it but wouldn't say I'm obsessed ....:eek:

As I discovered to my annoyance, you can't edit a thread title even if you spot a typo immediately after you've posted the thread-starter - you just have to live with the embarassment :(

Re: FOA Bagpuss
 

Don't worry everytime it looks like it will drop off the front page I will post and keep it going until "Give Us The Old Gree" shows us some evidence of slander.:confused:

BTW "Gree" bugs me I keep want to put an "N" on the end, must have run out of letters when registering.:rolleyes:

Re: FOA Bagpuss
 

Or an 'F'. ;)

Re: FOA Bagpuss
 

Is it too late to change this to, "the last straw and the short straw?"

Thought so. :(

It's all about timing, isn't it. :o

Re: FOA Bagpuss
 

think ya will have a long wait baggy, just oer 200 posts in two n half years, perhaps someone could run a sweep on when it will be?:D;)

Re: FOA Bagpuss
 

Very good Shaker:D

Sorry Oggy I didn't get yours yet.;)

Re: FOA Bagpuss
 

surprised nobody has said that maybe you should check your own posts first before going on about grammatical errors and possibly spelling mistakes:confused:

Re: FOA Bagpuss
 

Despite making an appearence to the forum yesterday, "Give us the old gree" failed to show any evidence of slander on accyweb, therefore I will take it that I was correct and he has crawled back into a hole in shame.;):)

Re: FOA Bagpuss
 

Bump !

Still waiting "Give us the old gree".

THE LINK WAS REMOVED BECAUSE CERTAIN PEOPLE WHERE BEING MADE TO LOOK AMATUER AND SHIRKED THEIR RESPONSIBILITIES, NOTHING TO DO WITH SLANDER.