Re: v Bury
 

He would've had his work cut out if he'd come along on Saturday. There were thousands of 'em at the Gigg! :D

Re: v Bury
 

I've watched the replay and no matter how many times I watch it he didn't 'whack it in the top corner'. If he had have 'whacked it in the top corner' it would have been a goal. Cavanagh has had a bet on Stanley to lose and is being investigated, he should never have been in the position of taking a penalty which could have decided a Stanley game, in fact, he should not have even been on the pitch, and don't give me that 'innocent until proven guilty' rubbish. He has admitted he had a bet and forgot about it.

Re: v Bury
 

Dead right, Jeff. Cutting out the crap as usual.:D

Re: v Bury
 

just cannot understand why some make excuses.:confused:

Re: v Bury
 

The accyweb mafia is out in full shooting mode today aint it!

Re: v Bury
 

OK MCR ADIM - What are your views on Cavanagh and Williams? Are you happy that they have had a bet on Stanley to lose? Will you be supporting them if the FA suspend them? Will you be protesting if Stanley sack them for being found guilty?

Re: v Bury
 

Pity Cavanagh wasn't on Saturday.:D

Posted via Mobile Device
Come on lads games over season finished, right or wrong cav tuck the pen ok he mist, jeff i under stand where your coming from but letw the fa sort it now

Re: v Bury
 

Well said Mab, none of us know the ins and outs of what happened for sure, once we do and IF they are both guilty then we know they will be sacked, tittle-tattling about it on here beforehand doesn't do anyone any good.

Re: v Bury
 

Most of the threads on this messageboard are tittle-tattling about something or other, so why not close every thread or even the messageboard if it doesn't do anyone any good.

Re: v Bury
 

well what Jeff stated happened fer sure, or is that ok with you Accymad? dya think also he would have forgot to pick his winnings up if his accumulator had come up? get real.:rolleyes:

Re: v Bury
 

Nowhere did I say that anything to do with this betting saga is 'ok with me' Cashman, I felt sick to the stomach when it first came out, all I said was until we know for sure that either or both of them is guilty (and right now the only ones who do know for sure are the lads themselves) what's the point of raking it over time and again.
There are some on here who don't like Rocky and/or Cav and in my opinion have used this as an excuse to have a pop at them before they know the truth.

Re: v Bury
 

Stanley regret lack of goal threat

JC worries over wage budget

I agree some people do not like Cav/Rocky and will use any mistake be it on the pitch or not to have a go at them! The betting thing was totally wrong! But until the hearing is over and everyone knows the outcome whats the point in saying anything. We can take alot of positives out of the season and put forward into the next season.

Re: v Bury
 

Rocky has not denied that he bet against Stanley. Cav has admitted that he bet against Stanley but is pleading not guilty. If Cav has admitted it then he is guilty and anybody is justified haing a pop at him. He missed a penalty at a crucial stage in a game whilst under investigation. I personally think that it was disgraceful that he took the penalty. I think there are a lot on here who don't like Rocky and/or Cav probably because they feel cheated after paying good money to watch Stanley then finding out that they are involved in a betting scandal. I bet there are a lot on here who don't like Mannix, Harris and Mangan as well.

Re: v Bury
 

In my opinion, Cav should not have taken the penalty! He was probably thinking of going out in a blaze of glory, but with all things considered - Bury, Betting Etc. Was not the right thing to have happened. We have a penalty taker, if he was not up to it then we have a few who can hit it hard - Cav being one of them, but wrong decision for him - if Proccy was not up to it Cav, as captain could have nominated somebody, but as somebody has already posted, Cav got the ball straight away and nobody was getting it off him.