Accrington Web

Accrington Web (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/index.php)
-   Accrington Stanley (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f93/)
-   -   Silkmen back for Procter (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f93/silkmen-back-for-procter-47559.html)

shakermaker 23-05-2009 20:39

Re: Silkmen back for Procter
 
Ryan isn't stalling on his contract offer. All being well with the takeover, he'll be a Stanley player for 09/10.

With Charnock though, as Coley says, if Peterborough demand a transfer fee then we simply can't sign him.

rude-dog 23-05-2009 20:43

Re: Silkmen back for Procter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by shakermaker (Post 716153)
Ryan isn't stalling on his contract offer.

too right i have every faith that jimmy will make the right decision. he looks like he is enjoying his football here. my only worry is if we lose a few players like prock, mullers, cav miles etc that he then has 2nd thoughts., which is why i will only be happy when there is ink on the contracts

Kiwi John 23-05-2009 20:48

Re: Silkmen back for Procter
 
I thought Ryan was all sorted???? http://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f...ner-47255.html

VALAIRIAN 23-05-2009 21:29

Re: Silkmen back for Procter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kiwi John (Post 716155)

It's not yet signed and sealed.............

Tin Monkey 23-05-2009 23:46

Re: Silkmen back for Procter
 
We haven't actually 'signed' anybody, so when the contracts expire in June they'll all be free-agents and can go anywhere. I know Mullin has another year, but he's on the transfer list.

If this 'take-over' (take forever more like) isn't sorted very soon, then who knows who we'll have left for next season?

Bagpuss 24-05-2009 08:49

Re: Silkmen back for Procter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tin Monkey (Post 716169)
then who knows who we'll have left for next season?

I better have a look for my boots then, the Ultras have one or two that Coley could call on.:)

Haggis316 24-05-2009 09:18

Re: Silkmen back for Procter
 
I hope Coley has a fairly full dossier of non league Bosman hopefuls and released academy lads because I think this uncertainty is jeopardising the chances of hanging on to our better players and he may end up having to largely rebuild the team.

Morecambe_Red 24-05-2009 19:09

Re: Silkmen back for Procter
 
Jimmy Ryan is on his way to Christie.

we are in negotiations with Keiran Charnock but at the moment he thinks his worth is more than our offer.

shakermaker 24-05-2009 19:42

Re: Silkmen back for Procter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Morecambe_Red (Post 716264)
Jimmy Ryan is on his way to Christie.

Got to be bull****.
Jimmy has agreed to sign a contract with Stanley. If the takeover saga has damaged our ability to sign a player that has already agreed to sign a deal there will be outrage. Something is rotten in the state of Denmark.

Morecambe_Red 24-05-2009 19:46

Re: Silkmen back for Procter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by shakermaker (Post 716274)
Got to be bull****.
Jimmy has agreed to sign a contract with Stanley. If the takeover saga has damaged our ability to sign a player that has already agreed to sign a deal there will be outrage. Something is rotten in the state of Denmark.


these things happen.

we were 30 minutes from signing former Blackpool winger Andy Welch last season after agreeing terms and then Yeovil gazumped us.

MCR ADIM 24-05-2009 21:01

Re: Silkmen back for Procter
 
If Jimmy Ryan goes than theres one word GUTTED

maccawozzagod 24-05-2009 21:57

Re: Silkmen back for Procter
 
a post on the football forum regarding Proctor

Its looking like we are going to sign him..... sorry Accy, thats football....

Great addition when it does happen, well done KA


also goes on to mention that Coley and Keith Alexander were deep in conversation at Wembley yesterday

shakermaker 27-05-2009 20:04

Re: Silkmen back for Procter
 
Apparently Keef Alexander has said in a local paper that Macclesfield won't be signing Andy Procter as he's too expensive.

If that's true, how will our wage budget and structure be able to keep him here?

VALAIRIAN 28-05-2009 07:27

Re: Silkmen back for Procter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by shakermaker (Post 716995)
Apparently Keef Alexander has said in a local paper that Macclesfield won't be signing Andy Procter as he's too expensive.

If that's true, how will our wage budget and structure be able to keep him here?

I don't suppose it will Shaker, it just means he will go somewhere else.....

maccawozzagod 28-05-2009 08:50

Re: Silkmen back for Procter
 
Proccy is taking exams at the moment and is 'mulling over' the contract offer from Stanley. He reckons he'll know more next week when his exams are done with and he can concentrate on what he has on the table.

Meanwhile Macclesfield and Rochdale have enquired over Mullin but were put off when they discovered his expected wages. From the looks of that Mullin will be staying.


All times are GMT. The time now is 18:59.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com