![]() |
Re: Silkmen back for Procter
Ryan isn't stalling on his contract offer. All being well with the takeover, he'll be a Stanley player for 09/10.
With Charnock though, as Coley says, if Peterborough demand a transfer fee then we simply can't sign him. |
Re: Silkmen back for Procter
Quote:
|
Re: Silkmen back for Procter
I thought Ryan was all sorted???? http://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f...ner-47255.html
|
Re: Silkmen back for Procter
Quote:
|
Re: Silkmen back for Procter
We haven't actually 'signed' anybody, so when the contracts expire in June they'll all be free-agents and can go anywhere. I know Mullin has another year, but he's on the transfer list.
If this 'take-over' (take forever more like) isn't sorted very soon, then who knows who we'll have left for next season? |
Re: Silkmen back for Procter
Quote:
|
Re: Silkmen back for Procter
I hope Coley has a fairly full dossier of non league Bosman hopefuls and released academy lads because I think this uncertainty is jeopardising the chances of hanging on to our better players and he may end up having to largely rebuild the team.
|
Re: Silkmen back for Procter
Jimmy Ryan is on his way to Christie.
we are in negotiations with Keiran Charnock but at the moment he thinks his worth is more than our offer. |
Re: Silkmen back for Procter
Quote:
Jimmy has agreed to sign a contract with Stanley. If the takeover saga has damaged our ability to sign a player that has already agreed to sign a deal there will be outrage. Something is rotten in the state of Denmark. |
Re: Silkmen back for Procter
Quote:
these things happen. we were 30 minutes from signing former Blackpool winger Andy Welch last season after agreeing terms and then Yeovil gazumped us. |
Re: Silkmen back for Procter
If Jimmy Ryan goes than theres one word GUTTED
|
Re: Silkmen back for Procter
a post on the football forum regarding Proctor
Its looking like we are going to sign him..... sorry Accy, thats football.... Great addition when it does happen, well done KA also goes on to mention that Coley and Keith Alexander were deep in conversation at Wembley yesterday |
Re: Silkmen back for Procter
Apparently Keef Alexander has said in a local paper that Macclesfield won't be signing Andy Procter as he's too expensive.
If that's true, how will our wage budget and structure be able to keep him here? |
Re: Silkmen back for Procter
Quote:
|
Re: Silkmen back for Procter
Proccy is taking exams at the moment and is 'mulling over' the contract offer from Stanley. He reckons he'll know more next week when his exams are done with and he can concentrate on what he has on the table.
Meanwhile Macclesfield and Rochdale have enquired over Mullin but were put off when they discovered his expected wages. From the looks of that Mullin will be staying. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 18:59. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com