Accrington Web - Dave O'Neil statement

Page 5 of 7

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

Accrington Web (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/index.php)

- Accrington Stanley (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f93/)

- - Dave O'Neil statement (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f93/dave-oneil-statement-49770.html)

Wynonie Harris

05-10-2009 22:05

Re: Dave O'Neil statement

Quote:

Originally Posted by kenny254 (Post 750967)

Have you ever thought that Mr Khan might be a glory hunter, who is enjoying the discontent at the club.........

Yeah, that's right, never heard of him up to a few weeks ago. Who the hell is he, anyway? Soddin' bandwagon jumper! :rolleyes:

Nickelson

05-10-2009 22:05

Re: On stanley on>>>>>

Why start a new thread ?

Redskin

05-10-2009 22:09

Re: On stanley on>>>>>

Quote:

Originally Posted by kenny254 (Post 750978)

How can the present situation at Accrington Stanley be the fault of Dave O'Neill, he hasen't got the club into this financial mess, but people are determind to blame him and make him out to be the bad guy that we should be in favour of flogging... There are a lot of hard working people at Accrington Stanley, who work long hard hours for a very basic wage, people are to quick to judge. I for one are getting behind the local club who deserves backing and support from the people of Accrington.

Here, Here!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

kenny254

05-10-2009 22:09

Re: On stanley on>>>>>

Why not...

katei77

05-10-2009 22:14

Re: On stanley on>>>>>

dont think ppl are blaming him for the mess but are blaming him for no straight forward answers

Revived Red

05-10-2009 22:19

Re: On stanley on>>>>>

Quote:

Originally Posted by katei77 (Post 750989)

dont think ppl are blaming him for the mess but are blaming him for no straight forward answers

and for lack of leadership, and lack of initiative, and inability to communicate, and unwarranted personal attack on another individual, and failure to compromise, and losing the support of his vice-chairman ........

Redskin

05-10-2009 22:19

Re: On stanley on>>>>>

Some people use the media, some people don't!......and that's not a criticism!

Stanleymad

05-10-2009 22:21

Re: On stanley on>>>>>

Quote:

Originally Posted by kenny254 (Post 750985)

Why not...

Erm can we keep discussions on topics already threaded rather than starting new ones basically with same topic, or otherwise be unindated with new threads sayin same thing, so hence move to more appropiate place where this discussion is in existance, thank you please:D

Redskin

05-10-2009 22:22

Re: On stanley on>>>>>

Thank God for British Justice!!!!!!!!

Revived Red

05-10-2009 22:23

Re: On stanley on>>>>>

Quote:

Originally Posted by Redskin (Post 750993)

Some people use the media, some people don't!......and that's not a criticism!

He was quite happy to use the medium of the club programme to launch an attack on another individual. But he failed to use that medium to put forward a positive alternative plan.

yonmon

05-10-2009 22:35

Re: On stanley on>>>>>

Quote:

Originally Posted by Revived Red (Post 750996)

He was quite happy to use the medium of the club programme to launch an attack on another individual. But he failed to use that medium to put forward a positive alternative plan.

But has he got a positive alternative to put forward Red ?...If he has he didn't say anything in depth about it !.......Wish he would !!.......but..

I Bet that he doesn't do any more Radio interviews!

'Where to next ??????

katei77

05-10-2009 22:41

Re: On stanley on>>>>>

Quote:

Originally Posted by Revived Red (Post 750992)

that may be very ture but he didnt cause the mess iin the 1st place but have to agreed he could of handle things alot better when the mess came to light when he 1st came to stanley,he must of known of the mess when he took over

i still believe he should give straight forward answers but a oneill witch hunt will not pay the taxman

kenny254

05-10-2009 22:46

Re: Dave O'Neil statement

Like what? His time? No I think not, he is quick to judge and more than a little upset that he was not given first option to buy...sour grapes me thinks.
And he's clever enough to get people to belive his ever word, if he was as keen on saving the club as he says then why pull out? is it because people won't roll over and play dead to his demands? He wants it all and has thrown his dummy out when he was told no....

Willie Miller

05-10-2009 22:51

Re: Dave O'Neil statement

[quote=kenny254;751004]if he was as keen on saving the club as he says then why pull out?quote]

He has a point!

Revived Red

05-10-2009 22:53

Re: On stanley on>>>>>

Quote:

Originally Posted by kenny254 (Post 750978)

people are to quick to judge

Actually, you are quite wrong there. You should read the posts that were being written a couple of months ago. David O'Neill was trusted; people believed that he was the person to lead us out of the mess. There was some concern that he failed to act on the fundraising issue even before the last court hearing. Then after that court hearing, we waited ... and waited ... and waited. But no initiatives were forthcoming - except from the hardworking fans. Only now are the judgements being made, and he has brought that upon himself by those programme notes and by his failure to say exactly how he plans to pay off the debt. Of course, we may be wrong - he may have an ace up his sleeve. But now there is a huge cynicism within the fan base - and beyond it. No-one else is to blame for that.

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:49.

Page 5 of 7

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page