Accrington Web - we'd rather go under than ...

Page 3 of 6

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

Accrington Web (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/index.php)

- Accrington Stanley (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f93/)

- - we'd rather go under than ... (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f93/wed-rather-go-under-than-49784.html)

JEFF	06-10-2009 13:36

Re: we'd rather go under than ...

Last Annual Return made up to 16th November 2008 so the next one isn't legally due until 16th November 2009 and can be lodged up to 28 days after that date. So leaglly everything is OK.

VALAIRIAN

06-10-2009 18:51

Re: we'd rather go under than ...

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jimbo T Hornblower (Post 751058)

Perhaps they truly do not see ASSF as the way forward for the club? Do we know for certain that ASSF is the only 'offer on the table'?
Questions questions questions - as someone else's Gran said in another thread, there are 3 sides to every story...

Jimbo T :horn8:blower

I believe that there is not another offer on the table! That comes from a very sound, reliable source! :)

Bagpuss

06-10-2009 18:53

Re: we'd rather go under than ...

Quote:

Originally Posted by maccawozzagod (Post 751019)

Two people who have the future of the club within their control have stated that they would rather the club go under than ....

I just keep coming back to this thread and reading the above, we cannot let this go without doing something, I just can't get my head round it, still stunned.:(:(:(:mad:

VALAIRIAN

06-10-2009 18:56

Re: we'd rather go under than ...

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fatso (Post 751100)

I think the key point here is whether or not the statement cited above is the genuinely held belief of those who said it, and that they really would rather have no club (and no investment) than have someone they disapprove of in charge, or rather if it's just bluff and bluster; fighting talk if you will.

If it's the former, then it will not just be them that lose their investments, but everyone else who is a shareholder. And, most importantly, there will be no Stanley.

The A.S.S.F. Believe very strongly that this was not a bluff of any sort!

Just another angle, we must wonder why Peter Marsden felt he had to stand down???

Accrington Stanley Football Club Limited
Sunday 4th Oct 2009

Vice Chairman stands down
Accrington Stanley vice chairman Peter Marsden has today resigned as a director of Accrington Stanley.

Speaking about his decision Peter explained "Personally I think the main protagonists involved in the off-field war of words afflicting our club should be locked in a room and not let out until they have resolved their differences.

"If required I would be happy to act as a mediator - not as a director but as an independent shareholder - but you can only help people if they want to be helped.

Food for thought????? :)

VALAIRIAN

06-10-2009 18:57

Re: we'd rather go under than ...

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bagpuss (Post 751295)

I just keep coming back to this thread and reading the above, we cannot let this go without doing something, I just can't get my head round it, still stunned.:(:(:(:mad:

Spot on Baggy :)

Tin Monkey

06-10-2009 18:59

Re: we'd rather go under than ...

Funny how all these little stories suddenly start dripping through today isn't it? I wonder if there's a pattern developing?

Bagpuss

06-10-2009 19:16

Re: we'd rather go under than ...

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tin Monkey (Post 751299)

Funny how all these little stories suddenly start dripping through today isn't it? I wonder if there's a pattern developing?

Explain???

sherry

06-10-2009 19:23

Re: we'd rather go under than ...

Is this the way to treat our team when they are doing their best?
With tonight's match postponed will they still get their pay at weekend? :(

Accrington Stanley v Shrewsbury preview: Captain shrugs off wage delay (From Lancashire Telegraph)

Tealeaf

06-10-2009 19:26

Re: we'd rather go under than ...

In the absence of any transparency in:

a) The full accounts of the club

b) Board minutes or directors statements pertaining to the above

.....I wonder if someone could possibly stick on here an excel spreadsheet showing the figures on the balance sheet as deposited at Companies House for the last 5 or 7 years or so? I know we've seen a Jpeg or PDF file relating to individual years posted on here before but it could be a useful exercise just to now reveal how the club has reached this position over the last few years. I know there are a few accountants on here....which I suppose, raises the question of how prior years accounts have been signed off with what now appears to be a serious understatement of financial liabilities.

KiTChener

06-10-2009 19:30

Re: we'd rather go under than ...

Quote:

Originally Posted by JEFF (Post 751088)

These two Directors are probably friends of EW and are carrying on his gripe. They should be named and shamed so that the fans can let them know what they think of them.

Ahem, at the risk of being libelous(SP), can I say one word R*****!!

Revived Red

06-10-2009 19:34

Re: we'd rather go under than ...

I've just been re-reading the SOS Press Release of 03/09/09 and Rob Heys' statement of 02/09/09 which are on the SOS website. Five weeks on, they really do make interesting reading.

smudgie

06-10-2009 19:58

Re: we'd rather go under than ...

1 word comes to my mind............. PROTEST!!!!

Bagpuss

06-10-2009 22:38

Re: we'd rather go under than ...

The Stanley Boys, The Stanley Boys.
In 20-9 they'll close the doors.
We're going to die because of Eric Whalley.
And the b*stards on the board who don't belong.

ukcowboy

06-10-2009 22:44

Re: we'd rather go under than ...

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bagpuss (Post 751374)

The Stanley Boys, The Stanley Boys.
In 20-9 they'll close the doors.
We're going to die because of Eric Whalley.
And the b*stards on the board who don't belong.

Since when has songwriting been one of your forte's Baggy?................Must say Im impressed mate :theband:

Bet it wont get sung tho!:(

cmonstanley

06-10-2009 22:51

Re: we'd rather go under than ...

Quote:

Originally Posted by VALAIRIAN (Post 751292)

I believe that there is not another offer on the table! That comes from a very sound, reliable source! :)

ive heard that as well ... but ive also heard d.s. ???

All times are GMT. The time now is 03:59.

Page 3 of 6

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page