Accrington Web

Accrington Web (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/index.php)
-   Accrington Stanley (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f93/)
-   -   we'd rather go under than ... (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f93/wed-rather-go-under-than-49784.html)

Revived Red 07-10-2009 12:44

Re: we'd rather go under than ...
 
I must be short of good reading material. Yet again, I've been reading Rob Heys' statement of 2 September. Let me pick out one small section:

Over the next few days and weeks we will be announcing a number of initiatives to bring in funds to be specifically used to clear this debt, some of which will bring in relatively small amounts, some hundreds of pounds, some thousands of pounds and some tens of thousands of pounds.

So what has happened? Especially to the intiatives that will bring in "tens of thousands of pounds"?

Willie Miller 07-10-2009 15:40

Re: we'd rather go under than ...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ukcowboy (Post 751376)
Since when has songwriting been one of your forte's Baggy?................Must say Im impressed mate :theband:

Bet it wont get sung tho!:(

Thats a bi harsh... when stuff needs saying, we can be trusted to say it....

We sung about the gamblers, we protested anout Mullin sale/loan, we sung on saturday of "not caring about O'Neill/Illyas... just about saving Stanley!"

If the time comes, we will be at the front of any protest, thats for sure....:p

Jase
Stanley Ultras

Willie Miller 07-10-2009 15:41

Re: we'd rather go under than ...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Bagpuss (Post 751374)
The Stanley Boys, The Stanley Boys.
In 20-9 they'll close the doors.
We're going to die because of Eric Whalley.
And the b*stards on the board who don't belong.

You got a talent buster!:D

Bagpuss 07-10-2009 18:25

Re: we'd rather go under than ...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Willie Miller (Post 751482)
You got a talent buster!:D

No I just changed the words to your/ultras song the credit is yours.:D

Stanleymad 07-10-2009 18:53

Re: we'd rather go under than ...
 
Some of u will have noted that posts have been removed seems there is an issue regarding post that could be a can of worm opener for ALL concerned with asfc not just the club. Possibly could have serious potential to cause harm to the sos cause & we all want to keep the club even if opinion is opposite. Please i know its hard to post feelings & questions but please think carefully about what u post, bare in mind the effects this can have - especially if said without proof if its even at the hint of accusation, but the balance is the hard thing between opinion or accusation/suggestion.

Bagpuss 07-10-2009 18:58

Re: we'd rather go under than ...
 
Back to whispering in darkened corners of pubs then.

Agree with you they had to go - FOR NOW!!!

lancsdave 07-10-2009 19:09

Re: we'd rather go under than ...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Bagpuss (Post 751558)
Back to whispering in darkened corners of pubs then.

Agree with you they had to go - FOR NOW!!!

I rarely go to the pub but if you have any rumours feel free to call in the shop :D

yerself 07-10-2009 19:19

Re: we'd rather go under than ...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Bagpuss
Agree with you they had to go - FOR NOW!!!

I'm in complete agreement with the plastic scouser. The cheek of some people, suggesting United fans are cockneys. :D

Stanleymad 07-10-2009 19:30

Re: we'd rather go under than ...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Bagpuss (Post 751558)
Back to whispering in darkened corners of pubs then.

Agree with you they had to go - FOR NOW!!!

Lol yep for now least till there is some truth in the matter best way :)

lindsay ormerod 07-10-2009 19:50

Re: we'd rather go under than ...
 
I think we are all in agreement on that one, for now. Just as an aside I mentioned the current situation to Sky's number 1 cricket commentator this week, let's just say he wasn't at all suprised........:eek:

Haggis316 07-10-2009 20:36

Re: we'd rather go under than ...
 
Its reached the world of business recovery accountancy.

Accrington Stanley edges towards administration - Accountancy Age

lindsay ormerod 07-10-2009 20:48

Re: we'd rather go under than ...
 
Having worked for 2 companies in administration I have to say it's very rare to make it back from the brink. Now would most definitely be the time for some very, very grovelly phone calls to Ilyas. Certain people need to swallow whatever pride they have left and go and do the right thing.....you know who you are !:eek:

simon 07-10-2009 20:53

Re: we'd rather go under than ...
 
Thanks Haggis,

There version of accounts seems to match the ASSF version, that we only got the 8week stay due too offer from ilyas of share issue...

lancsdave 07-10-2009 20:56

Re: we'd rather go under than ...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Haggis316 (Post 751595)
Its reached the world of business recovery accountancy.

Accrington Stanley edges towards administration - Accountancy Age

Administration ?

Wynonie Harris 07-10-2009 21:06

Re: we'd rather go under than ...
 
The Evening Telegraph's opinion...

Why Accrington Stanley's survival surpasses even the derby (From Lancashire Telegraph)


All times are GMT. The time now is 16:42.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com