Re: Peter Cavanagh is Innocent
 

This is the last post im going to do on this. My opinion is that Cav deserves another go at playing for stanley, i wouldnt say captain stanley as we are doing mighty fine with Proccy as captain but as a player, he is a good player and as ive been told he`s still keeping fit ready for when his ban has finished! So yes I would love to see cav back at the club and given another go playing for Stanley! I think he deserves it, hes done his punishment now move on!

Anyway, everyone has their own opinion and thats mine.

Thankyou and Goodnight :130:

Re: Peter Cavanagh is Innocent
 

His low free kick in the last minute against Torquay kept us IN league football. Im with the give him another go crowd. If the stay away proves that he has turned to dogpoo, then let him go.

Jimbo T :horn8:blower

Re: Peter Cavanagh is Innocent
 

let him back then we let them all back. its stanley not we love cav

Re: Peter Cavanagh is Innocent
 

I can't for the life of me see how a player would risk his career for a measly 5 pound bet ... I say if Coleman and Bell want him back,then back he comes. They more than anyone would know of what effect his presence will have on the team/club and fans.
Trust their judgement (it hasn't been too bad so far.) :)

Re: Peter Cavanagh is Innocent
 

He couldn't time a tackle to save his life. Cav was a Conference player at the best. I'm with cashman, I'd rather watch the dingles than a Stanley team with Cav as a member.
Guilty as charged.

Re: Peter Cavanagh is Innocent
 

After reading back the thread and a few other similar ones the same thing keeps popping up again and again, anybody else notice it?

Re: Peter Cavanagh is Innocent
 

The word Cav?

Re: Peter Cavanagh is Innocent
 

Anybody else see the irony of somebody called Russ taking the pee out of somebody else gambling :D

Re: Peter Cavanagh is Innocent
 

:confused:

Re: Peter Cavanagh is Innocent
 

:confused:

Sorry, missed the quote first time :o :o

Re: Peter Cavanagh is Innocent
 

Cav was a good player and a good captain but I dont think he will ever be as good as he once was (and some people will question how good that was). I personally wouldn't risk bringing the clubs name back into negative publicity for the limited possible gain. A fully fit, galloping down the wing like in the Unibond and early Conference, Cav would be worth the gamble - maybe. But a laboured and tired Cav, or an injured 50% of the time Cav certainly wouldn't.

Personally I love the guy and what he has done for the club over the years. I also think he was hard done by in getting charged. But it would be a no from me.

Re: Peter Cavanagh is Innocent
 

no no from here would be a backward step no player is bigger than the club.

Re: Peter Cavanagh is Innocent
 

im sorry but people calling for his return have a screw loose.


HE BET ON HIS OWN TEAM TO LOSE, I DONT CARE IF IT WAS 1P OR 100K!! AND WAS FOUND GUILTY OF DOING SO!!!!!!!!!

Yes he was a decent player, but we are 1000000% better off without him.

As agreed with somebody else, if ever the day he, rocky, mangan or Harris step foot back on our pitch is the day I walk

Re: Peter Cavanagh is Innocent
 

"I've never placed any bets on any game I've been involved in" - Peter Cavanagh, 2009.

I believe him. Always have, always will. Would love to have him in the squad again. If that brands me a fool then so be it. :)

Re: Peter Cavanagh is Innocent
 

What a terrible backwards step to the tainted Whalley era that would be. I fervently hope that Ilyas would veto any such move, otherwise honestly I would turn my back on the club, much as it would hurt to do so.