Accrington Web

Accrington Web (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/index.php)
-   Accrington Stanley (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f93/)
-   -   On behalf statement (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f93/on-behalf-statement-54073.html)

Stanleymad 19-07-2010 15:06

On behalf statement
 
RE: thread O'Neils statement

It has been removed at request by the club so the approved version will be posted soon and can be posted here too no probs, best see fishy site for details when the details have been edited on.

Please dont re post until official confirmation has been made otherwise i have to delete it as no permission has granted. As a few people have tried to post it & i've had to remove it im afraid.

Sorry im put inbetween, have to do whats right as far as any legalities go.

Nickelson 19-07-2010 15:25

Re: On behalf statement
 
shame it was a cracking read, I wonder what the new version will say.

Redash 19-07-2010 15:50

Re: On behalf statement
 
Oh dear, media censorship? the first step to total control?

shakermaker 19-07-2010 15:52

Re: On behalf statement
 
"Don't you see that the whole aim of Newspeak is to narrow the range of thought?"

Nickelson 19-07-2010 15:59

Re: On behalf statement
 
The article is still availible from certain sources ;).

Wynonie Harris 19-07-2010 16:06

Re: On behalf statement
 
They can't even do that right...you've gotta laugh, or else you'd cry!

cashman 19-07-2010 16:11

Re: On behalf statement
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Nickelson (Post 829881)
shame it was a cracking read, I wonder what the new version will say.

Hope someones copied the old un, could be interesting.:D

cashman 19-07-2010 16:16

Re: On behalf statement
 
they have.:D:D:D:D:D:D

Stanleymad 19-07-2010 16:16

Re: On behalf statement
 
My hands are a little tied with this as could be legal issue for owner of this site, altho they did post it on the fishy site its a grey area atm. Can only hope the club re posts it edited as required soon.
Posted via Mobile Device

Nickelson 19-07-2010 16:19

Re: On behalf statement
 
The arcticle is still on their website it is just removed from the homepage. So as far as im aware there should be no issue.

Stanleymad 19-07-2010 16:23

Re: On behalf statement
 
Yeah i noticed i can access the original link but cannot access from home page so begs its removed from public view but only from history database. Thats the bit im trying to ascertain.
Posted via Mobile Device

Wynonie Harris 19-07-2010 16:27

Re: On behalf statement
 
You really couldn't make it up, could you?

(Sorry, SM, not getting at you, you're obviously right to err on the side of caution).

Doug 19-07-2010 16:35

Re: On behalf statement
 
I appear to have missed all this; what statement are you on about and what have I missed.

Doug 19-07-2010 16:48

Re: On behalf statement
 
Intresting. It would seem the natural way to go, just wish I had a pot............

shakermaker 19-07-2010 16:48

Re: On behalf statement
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Doug (Post 829900)
I appear to have missed all this; what statement are you on about and what have I missed.

1) DO posts a statement on the official website.
2) DO pulls down said statement shortly afterwards for an as yet unknown reason.
3) In between (1) and (2), some access the site and read the statement. One member of this forum posts a link to the piece.
4) DO tells Stanleymad to remove the link from this forum.

About as clear as mud? Have a drink! Join the party on the old (sinking) ship Stanley.


All times are GMT. The time now is 20:38.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com