Accrington Web

Accrington Web (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/index.php)
-   Accrington Stanley (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f93/)
-   -   Port Vale Thread (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f93/port-vale-thread-55831.html)

lancsdave 28-11-2010 09:22

Re: Port Vale Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Trapdoor (Post 865063)
What happened to that post from the Bradford fan? I need something to laugh at...

Bantams only use fowl language ;)

football19 28-11-2010 11:43

Re: Port Vale Thread
 
Reamer,all i was doing was giving my opinion on your post " it was a poor performance tonight" and "they played good footy", If we dont have many shots and they dont either(check the match stats,acci nearly double theres),why were we poor and them good?
I accept a couple of players may have not have performed to there normal levels,but to say it was poor was a bit harsh as i couldnt see anybody not trying,even if on the night it wasnt coming off for them

Reamer 28-11-2010 12:46

Re: Port Vale Thread
 
All you can do is give your opinion, football19, and yours differs from mine. This forum is full of opinions on all sorts of topics but to say someone's 'having a go' just because they have a different opinion to you is out of order. I had an opinion and I gave my reasons, now if I were to call someone I was chatting to 'a plonker' without justification, I would consider that 'having a go'
Anyway you've neglected to mention that I also gave some positives in my original post, which is more ,apparently, than JC could do in his post match reflections
By the way, I didn't consult the match stats before forming my impression of the game. My opinion was based on what I saw

lancsdave 28-11-2010 17:13

Re: Port Vale Thread
 
Ooops that was a costly defeat, you lost out on your cup final ;)

AccyMad 28-11-2010 17:19

Re: Port Vale Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by lancsdave (Post 865172)
Ooops that was a costly defeat, you lost out on your cup final ;)

So have you :D :rolleyes:

Redash 28-11-2010 17:31

Re: Port Vale Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by lancsdave (Post 865172)
Ooops that was a costly defeat, you lost out on your cup final ;)

Do you already know who we would have got in the fourth round? :rolleyes:

jaysay 28-11-2010 17:34

Re: Port Vale Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by lancsdave (Post 865172)
Ooops that was a costly defeat, you lost out on your cup final ;)

Wouldn't have happened Dave Stanley's number would have been 1 and would be at home to dirty Leeds:D

lancsdave 28-11-2010 17:36

Re: Port Vale Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Redash (Post 865180)
Do you already know who we would have got in the fourth round? :rolleyes:


Crewe away :)

lancsdave 28-11-2010 17:38

Re: Port Vale Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 865181)
Wouldn't have happened Dave Stanley's number would have been 1 and would be at home to dirty Leeds:D

Not this round, numbers were done last week. Port vale or Accrington were always number 60

Revived Red 28-11-2010 17:40

Re: Port Vale Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by lancsdave (Post 865172)
Ooops that was a costly defeat, you lost out on your cup final ;)

Where were they published, Dave?

football19 28-11-2010 17:45

Re: Port Vale Thread
 
Reamer,you did make some fair points,but what i said was you was "a bit harsh",not out of order,on this occasion we will agree to disagree !!!!,
I also thought JCs comments were harsh,but he will have his reasons( probably hates losing!),at least we agreed Barnett had a top game,so we had something in common !

lancsdave 28-11-2010 17:51

Re: Port Vale Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Revived Red (Post 865189)
Where were they published, Dave?


I guess the FA published them on Tuesday, thats the day they were on Clarets Mad board

jaysay 28-11-2010 17:58

Re: Port Vale Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by lancsdave (Post 865187)
Not this round, numbers were done last week. Port vale or Accrington were always number 60

Sorry Dave didn't know that, so Stanley have missed the chance of visiting Anfield in round 4:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes :

Revived Red 28-11-2010 18:04

Re: Port Vale Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by lancsdave (Post 865200)
I guess the FA published them on Tuesday, thats the day they were on Clarets Mad board

Thanks, Dave. I wasn't aware of that.

lancsdave 28-11-2010 18:07

Re: Port Vale Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 865204)
Sorry Dave didn't know that, so Stanley have missed the chance of visiting Anfield in round 4:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes :


In a strange sort of way it might not be a bad thing. Lack of cup money might actually be better in the long run if it brings things to a head sooner :rolleyes:


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:16.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com