Team v. Bury
 

Lets have 11 proper players on from the start. If Putterill had come on with half an hour to go I'm sure we would have finished Chesterfield off. How come he can't get a start after galvanising our play when he came on at Morecambe to secure the win? To bring him on today with only 5 minutes to go was ludicrous. Coley's subbing, or lack of it, drives me crazy:(

Re: Team v. Bury
 

Subs:
Dunbavin
Hessey
Richardson
Parkinson
Putterill
McConville
Boulding

Re: Team v. Bury
 

Have to agree with you Redraine,we should have countered there subs with a sub or two of our own.but we're not the manager;):)

Re: Team v. Bury
 

i would start with 4 4 2. i think 4 5 1 at home is too negative and with their big centre backs it wont work.

Cisak
winnard long edwards jacobsen
mcconville proctor ryan putterill
craney gornell

Re: Team v. Bury
 

would go for 4132
cisak
jacoeson long edwards winnard
barnett
joyce craney ryan
putterill ( razor)
gornell

subs use them
any one that will come on

Re: Team v. Bury
 

:eek:

Exactly what was negative about our playing philosophy yesterday?

Re: Team v. Bury
 

I could answer that but will refrain, for fear of being accused of pursuing a vendetta.:D

Re: Team v. Bury
 

He did not rest anybody after a gap of one day, what makes you think he will change it after four????

To be honest, even if he does, it is too late!! Monday was the time to change it, but he did not!! 60mins was the time to change it/freshen it up, but he did not!!

We all know the score, it is his weak point, but I just wish that he would learn...

Would not change it too much, but Ray Putterill, from the start, I feel is a must!!

Re: Team v. Bury
 

Winnard has not played well for a while now and if Jacobson was staying on loan then i would say drop him and play bateson at right back. That would be only change as the rest of team were alright apart from 5 minutes saturday. Altough i would of considered taking mcconville, who apart from the goal and one good corner did nothin, and craney who ran out of steam off for putterill and turner for something different.

But now craney, long and jacobson's loans have ran out changes will have to be made anyway

Re: Team v. Bury
 

agree about winnard decent defender but distribution leaves alot to be desired. assuming loans are extended i would go
bavvo
richardson long sunbed jacobson
proctor barnett
ryan craney sean mc
terry

agree sean doesnt do alot but has a knack for sniffing out a goal so i would leave him in. putteril to come on late with all his energy

Re: Team v. Bury
 

Where is Bateson anybody know????????

Re: Team v. Bury
 

Chris Turner out with foot injury!! And having a scan to see what damage there is, likely to be out till end of jan:(

Re: Team v. Bury
 

Accy aggro , u seem 2 have a downer on deano, as u are a new member,are u a friend or related to someone who he's keeping out the team ?, u want him out the team when coleman doesn't

Re: Team v. Bury
 

Hahaha, pot calling Kettle, too funny.

Re: Team v. Bury
 

Really ??? where did u get that from ? hmmmmm:rolleyes: