![]() |
Time to go 2 up front
Rory Boulding posed more of a threat to the Shrew's goal during the few minutes he was allowed on the pitch than a certain player in the starting 11 whose name I can't bring myself to mention. Those who were there tonight will know who I mean. For all our great football we don't get enough shots on target, but Rory has always impressed me as a guy who will work the goalie, and he again looked lively tonight. Surely it's time to give him a start on Saturday?
|
Re: Time to go 2 up front
He would stand more chance of starting if he had an Uncle Jimmy on the coaching staff!!!:rolleyes:;)
|
Re: Time to go 2 up front
Some fair points Redraine but I don't think we can go two up front unless we go three at the back and that would mean losing the full-back aspect to our game which is a big plus for us.
I do think though that later in games when we need to go more direct we should bring on Andy Owens up front. So often our profligacy is down to a lack of a physical presence in the box. Sometimes we need to just get uglier. |
Re: Time to go 2 up front
Quote:
|
Re: Time to go 2 up front
Quote:
|
Re: Time to go 2 up front
We'd get overrun in midfield and our small defence would have no protection. As we saw so many times last season with a 4-4-2, there were gaping holes down the middle of the park. It only got better when we started to plug the gap with Peter Murphy/Johnny Flynn towards the end of the season.
|
Re: Time to go 2 up front
Quote:
|
Re: Time to go 2 up front
Completely agree Redraine. Still can't believe that decision.
|
Re: Time to go 2 up front
who actually understands that bloody law......certainly not refs or linos lets get back to basics if hes off hes off
|
Re: Time to go 2 up front
Another point about the man in question is why does he have to take every set piece and all he does every time is float it in jimmy and Charlie are both good set piece takers who can float it and whip it in as the did once he had gone off just an idea
|
Re: Time to go 2 up front
I tend to agree 4-4-2 has to be a viable option at times
|
Re: Time to go 2 up front
Quote:
|
Re: Time to go 2 up front
Quote:
|
Re: Time to go 2 up front
Rory Bouldings not the answer, hes lazy , cant pass and is greedy. Hes never been a success anywhere and i dont think he can be a success at stanley unless we shove him somewhere on loan for the rest of the season and gets his confidence up somewhere else. Same with Parkinson, i dont rate him at all and i think players like that bring our squad down. We lost two vital players last season, bobby and symes. We havent replaced them.
|
Re: Time to go 2 up front
I think it was always going to be difficult replacing Symes, Grant & Kee who as we all know were superb for us last season.
I think to label Boulding as that is abit unfair after his handful off appearances. Whenever ive seen him he has looked decent, and dont forget that equaliser against Wycombe when we were dead and buried. I think its a difficult thing to change a formation which has had relative success. Lets not forgot last night 2 of our first choice defenders where out, just look at Man U without Rio & Vidic, obviously 2 different levels but the concept is the same. Id keep the same formation BUT if its not working after an hour, then CHANGE IT and give Boulding more than 5 mins here & there and dont wait for the inevitable opposition goal. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 10:25. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com