Accrington Web - Rotherham Thread

Page 6 of 7

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

Accrington Web (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/index.php)

- Accrington Stanley (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f93/)

- - Rotherham Thread (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f93/rotherham-thread-56829.html)

cashman

15-02-2011 21:03

Re: Rotherham Thread

Quote:

Originally Posted by new red (Post 883886)

Totally agree Larry. Same 14 used week in week out regardless of performance. Some players are in a comfort zone and others like Bateson dont get a look in.

not knocking tonights performance but that has really bugged me fer a long while.:(

Grimps

15-02-2011 21:04

Re: Rotherham Thread

all i can see is down . with all thats going on at the club can the board keep a league team

DaveinGermany

15-02-2011 21:07

Re: Rotherham Thread

All to familiar, we played well, the better team, but unlucky to lose on the night/day ! Is it me or is this getting a little tiresome ? :(

new red

15-02-2011 21:13

Re: Rotherham Thread

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaveinGermany (Post 883893)

All to familiar, we played well, the better team, but unlucky to lose on the night/day ! Is it me or is this getting a little tiresome ? :(

Very tiresome but what we expect each time we dont get a result I'm afraid. And we are getting closer to that relegation zone:mad::confused::confused::confused::eek:

mab	15-02-2011 22:48

Re: Rotherham Thread

Quote:

Stanley had the ball in the Millers' net fifteen minutes from time, but the linesman had already called offside before Gornell lashed home.

Seems to be the story of our season sofar,why we ant winning theses sort agames with stats from tonights game we should have run out 3/4 2 winners,don't get me wrong Gornell is a good player,and has 10 so far but he needs help from a Andy Bishop type of player a propper goal poacher banging them in for the fun of it:)IMHO

nige b

15-02-2011 22:57

Re: Rotherham Thread

mab totally agree fella we need that predatory striker bishop,lowe, le fondre (again tonight with his puffy french name) but to get them i sadly believe is so well beyond our means and it's down to coley an jimmy to once again discover these nuggetts for peanuts

cashman

15-02-2011 23:06

Re: Rotherham Thread

meself wi what we got would like to see Putterill wi Gornell fer a few starts, think that duo may bear fruit,, but i aint a manager.:confused:

Grimps

15-02-2011 23:12

Re: Rotherham Thread

cash same here 442

cashman

15-02-2011 23:15

Re: Rotherham Thread

Quote:

Originally Posted by Grimps (Post 883951)

cash same here 442

agree 1 up aint doin too great.

Redraine

15-02-2011 23:16

Re: Rotherham Thread

We are powder puff in front of goal and never seem to be able to convert the half chances. My heart sank when Coley brought on McConville for Charlie, leaving Putterill still on the bench, for God's sake. Sure enough, his only contribution was a terrible miss, weakly shooting straight at the keeper's midriff from a great position in the box with an open goal beckoning. God, what an awful place to watch football, the home crowd silent until the last 10 minutes. Should have taken my binoculars.

MartynBiddulph

16-02-2011 00:17

Re: Rotherham Thread

ASFC News Story > 3862 The gaffer's thoughts on the game. Just got back, apologies there was not more updates but the internet kept dropping off at the ground!
Jimmy Ryan's thoughts on the game will be on the fishy site tomorrow afternoon.

dabeast

16-02-2011 11:11

Re: Rotherham Thread

Quote:

Originally Posted by Larry Lobster (Post 883881)

I know any criticism of Coleman is seen as blasphemy but hang on a minute. For a start it's a 2-0 defeat. It might be the 1st defeat this year but how many have we played? It's also just 7 wins out of 27 played.

Stanley must have one of the biggest squads in the League, one that they can ill afford to keep yet almost a full team of 1st team Pro's never get a look in. Too many players know they will start every match regardless of their performances.

I'd like to see a few fringe players given a chance, but i won't happen. It will be same again come Saturday.

Sneaky edit there to change it to a 2 nil defeat Mr Beast !!:)

Yeah in hindsight it looks like a bit of a rollicking larry....wasn't meant to - just genuinely wondered how you would change things. We do have the squad players and I don't automatically defend coley - but I don't get to many games (certainly not reserve games) so don't really know how the others are performing.

Revived Red

16-02-2011 12:04

Re: Rotherham Thread

Quote:

Originally Posted by new red (Post 883886)

Some players are in a comfort zone and others like Bateson dont get a look in.

I agree entirely about Jonny Bateson. What on earth has happened? He doesn't even make it to the list of subs now.

Not sure I agree about some players being in the comfort zone, though. I think we have a solid "first" squad of about 13 or 14, and those not in that group are really not up to it. That first squad generally plays well - the problem is the lack of a stiking partnership. In the absence of a Le Fondre or Bishop type player, surely it is time to let Terry Gornell and Craig Lindfield try to establish a partnership.

football19

16-02-2011 15:06

Re: Rotherham Thread

Its a funny one with Jon Bateson ( whos a very good player),the only reason I can think of is that in his last two starts the team conceeded 8 goals and got himself sent off when the game was lost against Bury.
I dont know if he responded with mom displays in the resis or not as I only saw the preston match and he was subbed.
The manager and coaches see all the players train daily,so to me ,its upto the player to catch there eye.
Same with Micheal Hall,who is a good player ,but couldnt force his way into the first team,

fc:stanley

16-02-2011 17:51

Re: Rotherham Thread

Not the best performance ever at the worse and only running track in the league! Gornell ran his socks off for nothing. Both Craney and especially Jimmy were just fustrated all the time and there keeper pulled of superb saves to stop us getting anything! Boring , boring game!

All times are GMT. The time now is 04:29.

Page 6 of 7

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page