Accrington Web

Accrington Web (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/index.php)
-   Accrington Stanley (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f93/)
-   -   Stevenage Thread (part one) (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f93/stevenage-thread-part-one-57847.html)

Preston Red 15-05-2011 15:16

Re: Stevenage Thread (part one)
 
I've got butterflies too! But so proud of the team & Coley & Jimmy, I believe & we are going to do this! My old Dad would never have believed this, let's do it for us & all the old fans no longer with us.

SamF 15-05-2011 15:25

Re: Stevenage Thread (part one)
 
Let's have 'em.

Larry Lobster 15-05-2011 17:04

Re: Stevenage Thread (part one)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by maccawozzagod (Post 906194)
Hessey back for me. All the clean sheets aat the beginning and end of the season have been the same back four - leave well alone.

Craney in for Barnett. I gotta admit I was one of those who surprised at Craneys return. I didn't think he offered us anything that we didn't already have (Putterill). But his return coincided with the resurgence in results and I dont think it is an accident. Cracking goals in February but more than that it is the way that he can pick a pass out that splits defences. He has to return.

I also think that Turner has to be at least on the bench. He might not fit into the team with the shape that we currently play, but he is an option if you have to chase a game. It means changing the entire formation though, but if needs must he terrifies full backs with his pace. I think he's a good outlet if we are winning and just want to punt it forwards hoping for the best. "chase that Chris"

Not quite the same, Bateson played the first 12 but i take your point and agree with it. Tonight might just be a game for experience, and with Hessey and Sunbeds in the centre of defence, it's there in abundance.

rishton 15-05-2011 17:09

Re: Stevenage Thread (part one)
 
Stevenage

  • 16 Day
  • 02 Wilson
  • 03 Laird
  • 04 Charles
  • 05 Ashton
  • 14 Roberts
  • 25 Henry
  • 08 Long
  • 13 Byrom
  • 24 Bostwick
  • 10 Reid
Substitutes

  • 29 Welch,
  • 31 Marjarson,
  • 07 Murphy,
  • 17 Winn,
  • 20 Beardsley,
  • 26 Harrison,
  • 27 Maamria

Accrington Stanley

  • 01 Cisak
  • 03 Winnard
  • 04 Hessey
  • 12 Edwards
  • 26 Jacobson
  • 06 Procter
  • 07 Ryan
  • 11 McConville
  • 14 Joyce
  • 27 Craney
  • 24 Gornell
Substitutes

  • 25 Dunbavin,
  • 05 Long,
  • 13 Richardson,
  • 17 Murphy,
  • 08 Barnett,
  • 10 Putterill,
  • 09 Lindfield
From the BBC

Kiwi John 15-05-2011 17:13

Re: Stevenage Thread (part one)
 
c'mon stanley

heth 15-05-2011 17:20

Re: Stevenage Thread (part one)
 
Come on lads!!!

Squeky bum time!!! :D :D :D

Doug 15-05-2011 17:21

Re: Stevenage Thread (part one)
 
Come on you Men of Stanley; be proud and play like you're playing for life itself. Accrington and the whole of Lancashire is your 12th man. On, Stanley On!

Doug 15-05-2011 17:23

Re: Stevenage Thread (part one)
 
Don't you just love John Colman…….The man is Proud. "Determination" Get them in Stanley.

Outback Ozzy 15-05-2011 17:32

Re: Stevenage Thread (part one)
 
Got the pics - bum also squeaky gl boys

Doug 15-05-2011 18:12

Re: Stevenage Thread (part one)
 
Whats that on the back of the lads shirts

caretaker 15-05-2011 18:31

Re: Stevenage Thread (part one)
 
could be three down, not a good first half

Doug 15-05-2011 18:36

Re: Stevenage Thread (part one)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by caretaker (Post 906383)
could be three down, not a good first half


They have got to fight back; and they have to want it. come on John, get some arse's kicked.

caretaker 15-05-2011 19:29

Re: Stevenage Thread (part one)
 
I think we were lucky not to have conceeded more goals, I have seen us play better. Still its only half time

new red 15-05-2011 19:34

Re: Stevenage Thread (part one)
 
Too many poor performances for me and a very costly sitter missed. Hope they play with more passion and strength friday or we are going nowhere.

Reamer 15-05-2011 19:43

Re: Stevenage Thread (part one)
 
Think you've got it right there New Red, Stanley were second to every ball and Stevenage wanted it more. Thought McConville should have smashed it past the keeper instead of trying to round him. Hope that miss don't come back to haunt us.


All times are GMT. The time now is 18:09.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com