![]() |
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
|
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
Stevenage deserved to go through as they were the better team over the 2 games. We couldn't cope with the physical element of the game and this is a weakness we need to address if we are to push on for next season. They were first to every ball and every header and this helped them to implement their game plan. Stevenage had done their homework and knew they couldn't let us have time on the ball, so they hurried us in possession and forced us to resort to long ball tactics which meant Gornell wouldn't get a sniff. Our full backs were also pegged back to stop the link up play between the wide players.
When you look back over both games we only really created 2 clear chances which just shows how well Stevenage stuck to their tasks both individually and as a team. Charles would be sort the of player we need in our squad to help give us a Plan B, which is so lacking at the minute. I can only hope that JC will learn from this and bring in some "physical" players that can help to boss a game so to speak. I think Chris seemed to offer a bit more to the game in 30 minutes than Craney did for the 140 minutes in the two legs. Ian didn't seem fit and wasn't ever really in the game, he shouldn't have played in the second leg in my opinion. I also don't understand why we didn't play Kevin Long who at least has some height that would have helped us to deal with all the set pieces and stop Charles bossing the game for them. We can blame the referee and the Stevenage antics but at the end of the day we just weren't good enough. That said 5th place was a brilliant achievement, its just a bit disappointing that we didn't make the most of this great opportunity. We need to keep the majority of this team together with JC and JB and we may just have a chance of maintaining the high standards that have been set this season. |
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
Compliments from Boro fans:-
Borochat - Congratulations Luton Town Well done to their fans too. They seemed to get quite animated at times, but I couldn't hear them at all from the middle of the Clayton End racket. Did they sing? |
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
2 compliments.
500+ negative. I really do detest 99.9% of that club and its fans. |
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
There's one thread where they're calling Dave a retard like the rest of us when we all know he's a Dingle:
Borochat - Congratulations Luton Town :) |
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
Quote:
|
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
Quote:
Do you think that your boss' attempts to create some kind of hatred between our clubs, had any effect on you getting two players sent off? It was clear on the night, that your players were pumped up - did Coleman go too far? My honest view of the game is that you huffed an puffed a lot and didn't create a whole lot (and the one decent effort you had was hand ball). We did what we needed to do to break your rhythm. It wasn't pretty, but even if we wanted to play nice football that joke of a pitch would have stopped it. I know this will provoke some vitriol about GW - but I thought he handled himself with dignity in both legs - despite Coleman's attempts to try and create issues between our clubs. |
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
Your manager's name & dignity do not go together well in any sentence - ask Farnborough!
|
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
Quote:
He's clearly also being more successful. There's a lot of hyperbole about the Farnbrough incident - the truth is no one really knows what happened. But that doesn't stop his critics speculating. |
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
Not much speculation needed really is there? He conned (sorry - persuaded) Vic Searle to take on Farnboorough & legged it leaving them in considerable debt which meant they had to go into liquidation - pretty straight forward really but as long as he's now seen the error of his ways I suppose that makes him an ok bloke???? Doubt you'd be saying that if it'd been your club that had been on the wrong end of his dealings
|
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
Quote:
Accrington Stanley 0 Stevenage 1: I’ve phoned this one in » The Seventy Two |
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
Quote:
|
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
Quote:
|
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
Quote:
|
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 01:27. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com