![]() |
Stevenage Thread (part two)
Hello all
Apologies for my lack of updates this week - it's a touch busy as you might expect!!! Here are a couple of things to get you built up for tonight's BIG game: Preview - ASFC News Story > 4098 Alex Cisak - ASFC News Story > 4101 Ian Craney - ASFC News Story > 4102 Perhaps more later! Dan |
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
For those of you who want a sneak peak at tonight's (shiny and exciting) programme... ASFC News Story > 4103
|
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
We really need to get out of this division! Look at the Div.2 newcomers for next season. Plymouth, Crawley, Dagenham, Bristol Rovers, Swindon, and either Wimbledon FC or Luton, plus at least 8 other Southern clubs from the current season.
|
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
C'mon stanleyyyyyyyyyyyy
|
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
After 15, and there's only one team in it.. :)
|
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
Really don't know why we haven't started with Kevin Long after all the problems we had at the back in the first leg. At least DJ is on the bench.
|
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
Hı folks Turkey calling - on Stanley on ...
|
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
Chimer!! were going good, just no goals-YET
|
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
Why do we keep 'lobbing' short balls into the box-we ain't wining them. On the deck would be better, or attack from out wide..
|
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
Dam..I have to go to my kids footy..Relying on SPARKIE updates. GO STANLEY. I BELIEVE.
|
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
On t´ınternet on and off durıng last dınner of holıday - Mrs Chimer not entırely approving ...
|
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
Quote:
|
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
ian craney off chris turner on
|
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
the bbc website ... text ...
62:52 The ball is sent over by Dean Winnard, Lawrie Wilson manages to make a clearance. 61:17 Substitution Chris Turner joins the action as a substitute, replacing Ian Brady. :p:p:p |
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
İve been womdering where Craney was. havıng seen the Beeb team lists ....
|
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
joe jacobsen got a red card .....
|
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
mcconville a red card ....
|
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
Don't blame the lads, stay with it John. We will be back.
|
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
sean mcconvilles red card for violent conduct so dan has been told .. he doing the commentary on radio lancs
|
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
That will make thıngs a bıt more dıffıcult ......
|
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
The guy is a leg iron
|
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
torquay is through in the other play off ....
|
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
beardsley has just scored for stevenage ...
|
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
4 mins of added time
|
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
What a shame. I would have liked to see Chris Turner getting some more time on the pitch tbh. Theres always next year.
|
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
Well that was stıll one hell of a good season ...
I belıeve - on Stanley on !! |
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
the ref and assistants made a quick exit ... the players didnt know what was going on ...
next year ... there will always be next year ... |
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
Shameful display, the only credit tonight goes to the fans. I was embarrassed by the attitude and behaviour of some of our players and the pitch looked like some kind of Somme re-enactment. We don't deserve to go anywhere based on that performance. I will now be concentrating my efforts on A.C.C, and if anyone wants to watch proper sportsmanship on a pitch rather than a cabbage patch you are free to join me. ( Well done to D Lloyd for finding some positives from that mess):eek:
|
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
Worst set of officials ever.
|
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
Quote:
|
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
Like Fulham game. Another big build up. Even bigger crowd. One or more players get sent off with a lot of the match to go. Thereafter no hope of retrieving anything. Just anti climax. Knew the writing was on the wall when we didn't win at Shrewsbury and got stuck in the play offs.
Typical play offs. The teams that finished higher ie us and Shrewsbury miss out:(:(:( |
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
Quote:
|
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
hard luck folks. Really wanted you to do it but still a great effort this season. I 1st red was a definate but the second was a bit of a joke and their player got the man sent off. Also the way Ryan Lowe was talking after the gane on sky he seems to think Coleman will be on his way.
|
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
"Don't care how a ref plays the game as long as he is consistent. It was one rule for them and another for us. He legged it off the pitch for christ's sake he knew what he'd done. "
Not from where I was sitting, in the comfort of my home watching the whole sorry tale unfold on Sky. You cannot defend either of those red cards, both stupid, and in the end Stevenage defended well and we didn't take advantage of playing on our home turf. No way around unfortunately, we were outplayed and outclassed in both legs and showed a real immature streak tonight. |
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
Nice to see most Stanley fans staying behind to applaud the team at the end. The team deserve that for the season they've had. Disappointing tonight of course, but to reach the playoffs is an achievement they can be proud of.
|
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
Bit ironic who should have scored the decisive second for Stevenage in the first leg.
Joel Byrom - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia One of our old boys - I remember he was a successful triallist back in 2006. |
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
So proud to be a red. Shame the Coppice End never took off with some vocals, they also left early. Excellent display by the Ultras...
|
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
Quote:
|
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
Quote:
think what everyone is forgetting accy stanley were favourites at the bookies and everywhere else for that matter ... for relegation at the start of the season ... they've done well ... so whats it going to be like next season ..... thats what we got to look forward to .... |
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
Quote:
|
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
Quote:
|
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
When a player goes down 30 seconds after the start of the game feigning cramp you get an idea whats coming up.
|
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
Quote:
|
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
Quote:
|
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
Quote:
You can also see the ridiculous dives when no contact was made.... and sadly I am referring to Stanley there. |
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
In fact I have the whole thing on Sky saved, I'll have a look back who it was but it was a Stanley player in the first half, went to ground clutching his head and on the Sky replay he hadn't been touched.
|
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
Quote:
|
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
I've watched Stanley a few times this season and the 2 games against Stevenage were by far the worst performances I've seen. Problem is when you are a footballing side you need to have a plan B to play teams who have no interest in playing football.
Just think if stevenage keep getting promoted the fixture list one day will read Stoke v stevenage. I wouldn't want to be at that game if you paid me a million pounds. The end of football as we know it. |
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
well i sure hope they beat torquay in the final, sure as hell have no wish to play them again.:eek:
|
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
Quote:
|
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
I agree that you may see more at the match than you might on Sky but for those close call "tackles" and a Sky replay that confirms no contact?? Both teams were guilty of some seriously over the top diving and theatrics but our hot-headedness was well out of order.
|
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
The lads played poor football of that there can be little doubt; something went wrong before or after the last league game and Coleys body language says it all; even before both games he was distant and closed off to my eyes, not the same man, he looks drawn and disillusioned what worries me more is I don't think it’s the boys or their performance. The team were never in the playoff's. Not one goal, not even a good chance in two games; that's not the Accrington Stanley we have come to know.
What I would like to see is the fan's and the club to get 100% behind the team and John and Jimmy and build for next season; keeping as much of this seasons team together and training to win the league outright next season; with commitment and investment it can be done. Forget the last two weeks; what a bloody fantastic season we've had. On, Stanley On! |
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
wrong doug there was a gift fer McConville in first game,
|
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
Quote:
|
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
Your 1st paragraph pretty much sums up what i have said in another thread. I have been labled a"sad loser" for saying it. I have never seen John Coleman stand their with such a look of indignation on his face. He looked like the game was up after 15 minutes.
Sadly, (in my view) these have been a couple of games too far in what has been a terrific season. One that will be a very hard act to follow. |
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
Just seen some bloke is predicting end of world tonight,he has said it before though so he's probally wrong again.;)
so its not the end of the world folks,always next season. |
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
Quote:
|
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
Well sky missed what rest of us saw, u had to be there to see the off camera antics, least wasn't as bad as Sunday's play, boro's creeping to the ref all the little winks liner that did one got, something dodgy going on, but Stanley weren't allowed to play & wasn't without trying! Ref debarcle will be one for question of sport what happens next? & footy gaffs shows :rolleyes:
We won something - trended on twitter, most of em now know Accrington Stanley now ;) even if it were to also disgust at officials runner, we can't have it all. We did well to get where we were, we lost it basically on 1st leg more than tonite, we really played better with 9 men a bit more willing. Also re slating of our facilities - excuse me this is the proper football pitches are, not bowling greens or plastic/astro false turf style, the winter damaged it nothing we can do unless all the people slating it puts money in a jar for it then !! |
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
Let's not forget our achievement because of tonight and last Sunday; this as been the best season Accrington Stanley 1968 have ever had. We finished fifth in the league; League two. John had no money; very little pitch and a team from out of nothing.
Accrington Stanley are a first class outfit and a force to be reckoned with. On, Stanley On! |
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
Yeah, disappointed we didn't give ourselves 90 before pressing the self destruct button - a bridge too far as it turned out - but,hey, at one stage we would have welcomed having a Stanley, even if back in the conf. What we have got is a boardroom we can trust and the basis of a side we can have high hopes for next season. Clouds on the horizon are probably the potential loss of John 'n Jimmy + maybe one or two players. Being south coast based I bow to the wiser heads who have watched Stanley far more often than I, but have always thought we lacked a serious threat from what was known as an inside forward in my day. My hope is that we can unearth from the conference the quality which Peterboro' did with the likes of Mikail-Smith, Boyd & Aaron McLean.Well done to all the players for a great season and best wishes to all my fellow messageboarders for a great summer ( or winter downunder, eh Kiwi ! ).
|
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
What silly postings Lindsay Ormerod, not even interested as to why you weren't at the match. As others have said, the off the ball thuggery was ridiculous, you had to be there - they are an absolute disgrace & so were the officials! Agree, we were posibly guilty of being naive and even John Coleman said they had done a number on us - lets hope they get hammered in the final.
|
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
Couldn't get there tonight as working, but feel gutted for the whole team at the crown. That said, I also feel immensley proud of the team for the way they managed to get into the play offs, we were after all expected to be further down the league at the start of the season lol.
This summer could be an interesting and possibly trying one for us fans, will the dynamic duo still be with us........I hope so, but you never know. No matter what tho, thanks to the generosity of the town, fellow football supporters and two very special gentlemen one thing is for sure, we will be back next season! Thanks asfc for a tremendous effort, its been fun! |
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
Of course if we had won the play offs we would not have had renewing our rivalries with Steve Evans to look forward to - or at least it would have been deferred for another season.:):):)
And Wimbledon could be in the League with us. |
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
This is a variant on some of the other coverage:
Accrington 0 Stevenage 1 (Agg 0-3): Visitors Set Sights on Successive Promotions - FanHouse UK |
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
Well we can talk about poor officials all day long.
But the fact of the matter is we where beaten by a better side over the 2 games. The pitch yet again was an absolute disgrace as was Mark Roberts in getting Mcconville sent off. I really do detest that man. We Will Be Back. |
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
Westley's post match comment looks innocent enough, but hides a cynicism about their play such as I have never before witnessed on a football field.
" It was important not to let them allow their game to develop." They suckered Stanley into losing their heads trying to fight fire with fire, but I don't want our players "to learn from that" as he suggests. I am stuck between hoping Torquay give them a stuffing, but at the same time never wanting to be subjected to their ugly ploys again. Wonderful support from the Stanley faithful last night, especially at the end, which I thought was quite moving, but then I'm a sentimental old get. I am grateful for an astonishing season with some wonderful performances, but I have a nagging feeling that, if Coley had fully used the squad he is always going on about, we would easily have been in the automatic play-off positions. |
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
Agree with most of the posts,and stevenages game plan worked home and away.The key was the second balls,and again they won that battle.
But whats happened to the pitch?,they have had 3 weeks at least to prepare it,and the sight of a wheelbarrow filling up holes with topsoil takes the biscuit. Talk about playing into there hands,unbelievable!!!. Someone must be accountable for it,thats all the neutrals talked about. Its impossible to play fast one and two touch footie in the middle,even Barca would struggle,so how was we going to beat them?,no wonder Coleman seemed deep in thought all the time,he must have been so frustrated. |
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
i'd have been deep in thought wi NO planB thats the bottom line IMHO.
|
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
An excerpt from an article by Paul Fletcher on the BBC site:
Back in March the Football League wrote to Stevenage asking them for their response to suggestions that players were systematically feigning injury during games so that Westley could use the stoppages to relay tactical information to his team and provide them with fluids to refuel. "The Football League asked the club to be mindful of certain aspects of the spirit of the game," said Westley in March. "There's no specific criticism in there." Here's the link: BBC - Paul Fletcher: Westley steering Stevenage to new heights |
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
Definitely noticing a difference in reaction from those who were at the game (including neutral journos) and those who watched it on Sky.
|
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
Quote:
Not sure how many games have been played on it in that time but it has been used for local cup-finals. |
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
We were better than Sunday but allowed Stevenage as others have said to dictate the pattern of play again last night.
I expected a big change of game plan last night but it never materialised with play being broke up or injurys being feigned on both sides putting paid to that. We literally fell down our own trap of focussing more on what they had done rather than what we were capable of doing and then falling hook, line & sinker for it all again. As daft as it was it seemed we created more when we went down to nine men than when we played with eleven? It has been a wonderful journey this season with great football along the way but for it to end as it did is a hard pill to swallow. |
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
Over the two legs I think we failed in two key aspects. Firstly, our tactics. In the first leg we allowed Stevenage to isolate our key attacking players and give us no options through their high pressing. We should've been quicker on the ball and better in our movement off it. In the second leg we were too reliant on the hope that Terry could somehow outjump/outmuscle two goliath centre-halves and singlehandedly provide a second phase that our midfield could capitalise on. It didn't work. Obviously, the pitch halted our normal passing game, but we should've adapted and exploited the channels that Stevenage dominated in both legs. Granted, Coley tried to bring some width to our game in the likes of Chris Turner but it was too little too late (well done to Chris though, he did well with what he was given).
Secondly, our mentality was not strong. Perhaps it's down to the average age of the starting eleven being so young (apart from Grandad Hess), but we allowed Stevenage's bullying tactics to diminish our will to fight on. Stevenage had very, very simple tactics but were 100% concentrated on them over 180 minutes. We on the other hand often looked clueless. I do think that resting the majority of the first team at Burton was a massive mistake and only made the players lose their winning mentality by giving them more time off the pitch to get overwhelmed by the prospect of the play-offs. Our weaknesses were exploited well and we got what we deserved out of the two legs: Nowt. |
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
"On the evidence of what I saw on Friday, Accrington should not be too disheartened because they have a lot going for them. The Crown Ground was awash with red and white flags and Stanley's fans deserve great credit for the effort they put in to making the ground as colourful and atmospheric as possible. I thought there was an intimacy about watching a game there that you rarely experience. Many of the players were on first-name terms with the fans and the local community appears to be at the very heart of the club."
|
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
It was always going to be an uphill battle but the same "key" players that let the team down in the first leg did the same in the second. Especially McConville who with his sending off put the game to rest. Fair enough Jacobsen (who had played very well IMHO) was red carded for a bad challenge but the latter card was avoidable. Pat on the back for all the others on the pitch they battled to the end and kept the score respectable. Coley's body language wasnt good from the off and he looked like a man with a lot on his mind. Big question now who should stay and who should go. Lets hope next season brings as many highs as this one. Play offs were just that bridge too far but would settle for the same next season.
|
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
|
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
Stevenage deserved to go through as they were the better team over the 2 games. We couldn't cope with the physical element of the game and this is a weakness we need to address if we are to push on for next season. They were first to every ball and every header and this helped them to implement their game plan. Stevenage had done their homework and knew they couldn't let us have time on the ball, so they hurried us in possession and forced us to resort to long ball tactics which meant Gornell wouldn't get a sniff. Our full backs were also pegged back to stop the link up play between the wide players.
When you look back over both games we only really created 2 clear chances which just shows how well Stevenage stuck to their tasks both individually and as a team. Charles would be sort the of player we need in our squad to help give us a Plan B, which is so lacking at the minute. I can only hope that JC will learn from this and bring in some "physical" players that can help to boss a game so to speak. I think Chris seemed to offer a bit more to the game in 30 minutes than Craney did for the 140 minutes in the two legs. Ian didn't seem fit and wasn't ever really in the game, he shouldn't have played in the second leg in my opinion. I also don't understand why we didn't play Kevin Long who at least has some height that would have helped us to deal with all the set pieces and stop Charles bossing the game for them. We can blame the referee and the Stevenage antics but at the end of the day we just weren't good enough. That said 5th place was a brilliant achievement, its just a bit disappointing that we didn't make the most of this great opportunity. We need to keep the majority of this team together with JC and JB and we may just have a chance of maintaining the high standards that have been set this season. |
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
Compliments from Boro fans:-
Borochat - Congratulations Luton Town Well done to their fans too. They seemed to get quite animated at times, but I couldn't hear them at all from the middle of the Clayton End racket. Did they sing? |
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
2 compliments.
500+ negative. I really do detest 99.9% of that club and its fans. |
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
There's one thread where they're calling Dave a retard like the rest of us when we all know he's a Dingle:
Borochat - Congratulations Luton Town :) |
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
Quote:
|
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
Quote:
Do you think that your boss' attempts to create some kind of hatred between our clubs, had any effect on you getting two players sent off? It was clear on the night, that your players were pumped up - did Coleman go too far? My honest view of the game is that you huffed an puffed a lot and didn't create a whole lot (and the one decent effort you had was hand ball). We did what we needed to do to break your rhythm. It wasn't pretty, but even if we wanted to play nice football that joke of a pitch would have stopped it. I know this will provoke some vitriol about GW - but I thought he handled himself with dignity in both legs - despite Coleman's attempts to try and create issues between our clubs. |
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
Your manager's name & dignity do not go together well in any sentence - ask Farnborough!
|
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
Quote:
He's clearly also being more successful. There's a lot of hyperbole about the Farnbrough incident - the truth is no one really knows what happened. But that doesn't stop his critics speculating. |
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
Not much speculation needed really is there? He conned (sorry - persuaded) Vic Searle to take on Farnboorough & legged it leaving them in considerable debt which meant they had to go into liquidation - pretty straight forward really but as long as he's now seen the error of his ways I suppose that makes him an ok bloke???? Doubt you'd be saying that if it'd been your club that had been on the wrong end of his dealings
|
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
Quote:
Accrington Stanley 0 Stevenage 1: I’ve phoned this one in » The Seventy Two |
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
Quote:
|
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
Quote:
|
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
Quote:
|
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
Quote:
|
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
Quote:
|
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
I have stopped reading it.
It really is pathetic what they come out with. No wonder they are hated throughout football. |
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
Quote:
How memorable is your football club? » The Seventy Two! ;) |
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
Superb find Mike !!!
"ASFC a club that will ALWAYS be more famous AND have more friends in football than Satanage" |
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
an S.S. eleven would have more friends than Satanage smudge.:D
|
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
Quote:
Congratulations to our fans, an absolute credit to the town / club. And congrats to Stanley for a great season - not good enough over the two games, but still an excellent achievement. |
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
Satanage have sold 2500 play off final tickets so far. :p
|
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
Quote:
|
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
Quote:
|
Re: Stevenage Thread (part two)
Theyve sold just under 4000 apparently and Torquay 7000! Going to be dead at all Trafford !! Especially with two of the quietest teams in the league !!! Ha
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 01:17. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com