![]() |
Re: wes ?
|
Re: wes ?
Was probably played in his correct position.:rolleyes:
|
Re: wes ?
From my perspective he never looked interested after his first game. Maybe his nose was put out of joint by being asked to play in a different position, I don't know. Maybe he thought he was better than League 2 football. If he's happier playing in Burnley's ressies than the Football League, well fair play to him. All the best. Sinnabit.
|
Re: wes ?
I too noticed, that in the last few games he played, he didn't seem interested at all.
|
Re: wes ?
Maybe he's 1k - 2k a week even in reserves???? who knows???? :o
|
Re: wes ?
Joined The Alex until Jan!!!
|
Re: wes ?
strange move that one,as crewe are no better than Acci and its further away!!,wish him all the best tho,got a load of talent,but time will tell
|
Re: wes ?
A source said that there's a clause in the loan deal, making sure that Fletcher is only ever played up front and never has to track back and is under no pressure to score goals.*
*This may not be true. |
Re: wes ?
now now shaker,he may blossom as there "loan"striker:)
|
Re: wes ?
scored a nice goal yesterday,still think he will turn into a very good player,notice hes playing up front:)
|
Re: wes ?
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 07:44. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com