Accrington Web

Accrington Web (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/index.php)
-   Accrington Stanley (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f93/)
-   -   stanley forum (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f93/stanley-forum-6056.html)

rob 18-10-2004 13:09

stanley forum
 
our messageboard on the whole is great, however there have been more and more comments recently with 'insider information' or statements about things that someone has been told etc... just a couple of examples from the last day or so, both of which are absolute nonsense :-) :

"to be fair i dont think we can afford anything on gate money considering this seasons budget is relying on 2000 a game and were not getting that."

"i was told that if howson played more than eight games his wages would be increased as he was the lowest payed at the club."

no problems with these appearing on here, but this is just a reminder to everyone not to believe everything they read or hear :-)

rob

Wynonie Harris 18-10-2004 13:24

Re: stanley forum
 
Glad to hear it, Rob (especially concerning the first staement)! Although it probably won't stop me whinging about gates...

rob 18-10-2004 13:32

Re: stanley forum
 
it won't stop us whinging about gates either :-) the more the merrier!

Mik Griff 18-10-2004 13:43

Re: stanley forum
 
Glad to hear :)

Bazf 18-10-2004 13:47

Re: stanley forum
 
Good to see the club responding to some of the drivel thats been on the forum recently we seem to have more insiders then buckingham palace. Although I did hear the other day that a .............................................

Mik Griff 18-10-2004 14:02

Re: stanley forum
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Bazf
Good to see the club responding to some of the drivel thats been on the forum recently we seem to have more insiders then buckingham palace. Although I did hear the other day that a .............................................

Kev didnt tell you did he? :D

accystankev 18-10-2004 20:42

Re: stanley forum
 
Glad the second one isn't true. If he had been shipped out because we didn't want to pay more wages then it would have been extremely stupid!

Also, glad the first one isnt true too as we'd be having trouble financially if this was true. I dont think anyone will stop conplaining about the gates. we couldn't even get a good croud in fopr a tv game

Jimbo T Hornblower 19-10-2004 07:38

Re: stanley forum
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by rob
our messageboard on the whole is great, however there have been more and more comments recently with 'insider information' or statements about things that someone has been told etc... just a couple of examples from the last day or so, both of which are absolute nonsense :-) :

"to be fair i dont think we can afford anything on gate money considering this seasons budget is relying on 2000 a game and were not getting that."

"i was told that if howson played more than eight games his wages would be increased as he was the lowest payed at the club."

no problems with these appearing on here, but this is just a reminder to everyone not to believe everything they read or hear :-)

rob

I cant believe you had to post that Rob.. I suppose some people on here WOULD need telling that the content of half the forum posts now are utter bilge (probably the ones posting it....) whereas its common sense to ignore it for most people...

Jimbo T :horn8:blower

Oldgobbin 19-10-2004 07:53

Re: stanley forum
 
Well said Jimbo. I notice our old friend Henry Morton has made a similar point in another thread about the drivel posters who come on here. The trouble is, he's used long words like "metaphorically", "antipathy" and "oblivion", so there's no way they'll understand what he's on about - their standards being the likes of "croud", "goin" and "cumin" (a pleasant spice!). I'm afraid this forum seems now to have been largely taken over by the Kindergarten brigade and seems to be going the way of the much-lamented old official forum. An idea.... why don't they all go off to Accything dot com and stay there? At least they'll all understand each other and can post bilge to their hearts' content!

Wynonie Harris 19-10-2004 09:32

Re: stanley forum
 
Alright, alright, I admit it, I'm gullible. However, the "2,000 gates to break even" rumour is one I've heard a few times (including on the tube travelling back from Dagenham from a Stanley fan I bumped into). Anyway, I'm very glad that Rob's rubbished that particular myth and I promise to be more sceptical when I hear rumours in future. Sorry, chaps!

Won't stop me grumbling about attendances, though...

simon 19-10-2004 10:14

Re: stanley forum
 
If you click on a person's avitar the next page offer you the option to either place this person on your buddy list OR your IGNORE list :) When a person is on ignore it still show's they have posted but with no more.

On my ignore list is, Accystankev, Princesshales, knowthescore, K3mpy, Confused, Dr.d.

Have I missed any??????

Worth a try :)

Shurm 19-10-2004 10:46

Re: stanley forum
 
You missed Shurm hehehehehehe :)

Jimbo T Hornblower 19-10-2004 12:17

Re: stanley forum
 
Wynonie, the point about low attendance is a good and valid one - keep grumbling! Half the crap on here is both pointless and factless at the moment - thats the stuff we need to ignore...

Jimbo T :horn8:blower

Wynonie Harris 19-10-2004 12:41

Re: stanley forum
 
Couldn't agree more, Jimbo, but the more dim-witted posters tend to get fed up and move on to a new fad after awhile. Jon Tickle for example!

baldy 19-10-2004 17:37

Re: stanley forum
 
how about to keep everyone happy why dont all the people that type in there own language go on the footy mad website therefore accystankev will be happy and we will be happy

well i tried


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:13.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com