Accrington Web
Page 9 of 11 12345678 9 1011
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

Accrington Web (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/index.php)
-   Accrington Stanley (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f93/)
-   -   Leam gong ?????... (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f93/leam-gong-64158.html)

cashman 01-05-2013 18:56
Re: Leam gong ?????...
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by DAV007 (Post 1056813)
No one criticised the man, on the contrary his personality and history with the club was praised.
Cobblers yeh said he wasn't up to the job, or is that praise n i'm stupid?:rolleyes:

Div3North 01-05-2013 19:47
Re: Leam gong ?????...
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Div3North (Post 1056428)
If I'd had to spend weeks reading mindless posts about "sack the manager" and "bring back Coley", and someone offer to double my salary (or whatever) I'd probably have walked too ...........

Damn shame, but if you feel unwanted it's another factor in the decision .......
Quote:
Originally Posted by DAV007 (Post 1056502)
Its clearly the fault of the fans who questioned are worst ever run in the league.

Who is the snake now!

He who laughs last laughs longest!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Div3North (Post 1056771)
A number of people on here showed him neither loyalty or respect just a few short weeks ago

Say what you like, that will have an effect on anybody's morale

Should we perhaps wait until the true story comes out before we brand him "snake" as well? I think he deserves better than that ...........
Quote:
Originally Posted by DAV007 (Post 1056813)
No one criticised the man, on the contrary his personality and history with the club was praised.
In both replies you "quoted" my earlier post above

Explain, please, your last post above, bearing in mind your use of the phrase "who is the snake now". Is that not a criticism?

Revived Red 01-05-2013 21:56
Re: Leam gong ?????...
 
I have now realised that what makes it so difficult to have any kind of rational and meaningful debate with DAV007 (and now Alvin and a couple of others) is that, as Exile on Spencer St said, they inhabit a kind of parallel universe. In their universe, comparatively simple words take on a strange new meaning and are interpreted in ways that are incomprehensible to those of us in the real world.

I think that is why so many threads quickly degenerate into mud slinging when these people become involved. Those of us hoping for intelligent debate and discussion are constantly confounded by having our thoughts and words twisted to fit into that other universe.

Like most people on here, I have no problem at all with opinions that may differ from mine. But I do have a problem when my words, and the words of others, are twisted in an attempt to make them say what they never said.

DAV007 01-05-2013 22:41
Re: Leam gong ?????...
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Div3North (Post 1056829)
In both replies you "quoted" my earlier post above

Explain, please, your last post above, bearing in mind your use of the phrase "who is the snake now". Is that not a criticism?
The above statement was made AFTER he had decided to leave Stanley.
You now think it had a bearing on his decision as well?
Logic?

DAV007 01-05-2013 22:43
Re: Leam gong ?????...
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Revived Red (Post 1056857)
I have now realised that what makes it so difficult to have any kind of rational and meaningful debate with DAV007 (and now Alvin and a couple of others) is that, as Exile on Spencer St said, they inhabit a kind of parallel universe. In their universe, comparatively simple words take on a strange new meaning and are interpreted in ways that are incomprehensible to those of us in the real world.

I think that is why so many threads quickly degenerate into mud slinging when these people become involved. Those of us hoping for intelligent debate and discussion are constantly confounded by having our thoughts and words twisted to fit into that other universe.

Like most people on here, I have no problem at all with opinions that may differ from mine. But I do have a problem when my words, and the words of others, are twisted in an attempt to make them say what they never said.
Rather than throw mud, why not give an example?

Div3North 01-05-2013 23:52
Re: Leam gong ?????...
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by DAV007 (Post 1056866)
The above statement was made AFTER he had decided to leave Stanley.
You now think it had a bearing on his decision as well?
Logic?
No, I don't think you calling him a snake had any bearing on his decision to resign. Nor did I suggest it did.

I said that some people showed him no loyalty or respect. I never mentioned criticism ..... You bought that word up. Criticism is not the same as lack of loyalty or respect. Your response was not a reply to what I'd said - it was a non-sequitur of your making.

However, since you had said no-one had criticised him even though you called I'm a snake, I invited you to comment on the anomaly. You either missed the point completely, or elected to ignore it. Either way I think Revived Red is right

maccawozzagod 02-05-2013 00:12
Re: Leam gong ?????...
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Revived Red (Post 1056857)
Like most people on here, I have no problem at all with opinions that may differ from mine. But I do have a problem when my words, and the words of others, are twisted in an attempt to make them say that I love Anneka Rice and wouldn't mind pudding my Treasure into her Hunt what they never said.

bloody hell RR, steady on old chap!!!! :eek:

winstanley asfc 02-05-2013 00:52
Re: Leam gong ?????...
 
I ended up with 8 of those Leam Richardson masks given out before last Saturday's game. Does anyone want them?:o

DAV007 02-05-2013 07:08
Re: Leam gong ?????...
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Div3North (Post 1056871)
No, I don't think you calling him a snake had any bearing on his decision to resign. Nor did I suggest it did.

I said that some people showed him no loyalty or respect. I never mentioned criticism ..... You bought that word up. Criticism is not the same as lack of loyalty or respect. Your response was not a reply to what I'd said - it was a non-sequitur of your making.

However, since you had said no-one had criticised him even though you called I'm a snake, I invited you to comment on the anomaly. You either missed the point completely, or elected to ignore it. Either way I think Revived Red is right

Again, your wrong.
I did not call him a snake, I wrote ' who is the snake now?'.
Sorry to dampen your agenda, but its important to be factual.

cashman 02-05-2013 07:21
Re: Leam gong ?????...
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by cashman (Post 1056817)
Cobblers yeh said he wasn't up to the job, or is that praise n i'm stupid?:rolleyes:
Summat else also Factual, funny yeh aint commented?:D

DAV007 02-05-2013 08:08
Re: Leam gong ?????...
 
Your right cashman, I got it badly wrong.
B

AsFc62 02-05-2013 11:39
Re: Leam gong ?????...
 
The handbags of DAV007 & Cashman continue... Makes a good read.

ianray 02-05-2013 13:57
Re: Leam gong ?????...
 
Just for the records SNAKE NO1 Paul Cook SNAKE NO 2 Leam Richardson Reason being Leam had been sorting out a deal long before he left ASFC

cashman 02-05-2013 14:32
Re: Leam gong ?????...
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by ianray (Post 1056956)
Just for the records SNAKE NO1 Paul Cook SNAKE NO 2 Leam Richardson Reason being Leam had been sorting out a deal long before he left ASFC
Perhaps they are constructing a "Nest Of Vipers"?:D

Revived Red 02-05-2013 16:04
Re: Leam gong ?????...
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by cashman (Post 1056961)
Perhaps they are constructing a "Nest Of Vipers"?:D
Nothing can be addered to that. Ok, I'll get my coat!:D


All times are GMT. The time now is 21:44.
Page 9 of 11 12345678 9 1011
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com