Accrington Web

Accrington Web (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/index.php)
-   Accrington Stanley (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f93/)
-   -   Crooks? (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f93/crooks-68202.html)

Inspector Morse 18-04-2016 14:17

Crooks?
 
Anyone know if Crooks is fit for tomorrow?

LET suggest Brown and Gornell out.

Red-Osbornello 18-04-2016 14:19

Re: Crooks?
 
Match preview on the fishy site suggests he's back in training.

I'd be surprised if he's thrown straight back in though.

smudgie 18-04-2016 14:42

Re: Crooks?
 
Buxton in there for me.

cashman 18-04-2016 15:14

Re: Crooks?
 
Gotta agree wi Buxton if crooksy aint ready.

AccyMad 18-04-2016 15:41

Re: Crooks?
 
Or Rommy??

Exile on Spencer St 18-04-2016 15:49

Re: Crooks?
 
What's the problem with Terry Gornell? He played a good part in the win at Luton and I did wonder, given Professor Coleman's preference for sticking with an unbeaten team, whether Billy Kee might have to wait.
Didn't see the game on Saturday but suspect Crooks' absence was a big issue. As someone else noted, Dr.Proctor is a Stanley hero but unlikely to be many folks' first choice as an attacking midfielder.
I wonder if Bucko could do Captain Conneely's more defensive role and the captain adapt to the attacking midfield role?
Edit: of course, had overlooked M.Boco.

Inspector Morse 18-04-2016 16:04

Re: Crooks?
 
I think Gornells ill.

What about Pearson in midfield and Buxton at LB?

I think Buxton's a good player but seems easily wandered at times.

smudgie 18-04-2016 17:00

Re: Crooks?
 
Gornell is ill apparently..............

football19 18-04-2016 17:00

Re: Crooks?
 
I would have experimented with bucko earlier in the campaign,but not now,too Mitch at stake,then again you could drop windass back and put boco or ANother up with Billy

baldy 18-04-2016 18:48

Re: Crooks?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by football19 (Post 1166573)
I would have experimented with bucko earlier in the campaign,but not now,too Mitch at stake,then again you could drop windass back and put boco or ANother up with Billy

Rommy alongside Seamus for me, You know you'll get a shift out of him and prefer Windass on the attack!

Anthony Barry isn't a bad player, Just depends how match fit he is!

cashman 18-04-2016 18:58

Re: Crooks?
 
Agree wi baldy Windass is much preferable in attack. Bucko or Rommy alongside Seamus. Bucko played great in that position at Leeds the other year, so either for me will be fine.:)

monkey hanger 19-04-2016 08:29

Re: Crooks?
 
if it was earlier in the season we could move a few players around but now its to keep as many lads in the same position or play like for like. I,d try bucko in place of brown with romy to come on if things are not going too well.

smudgie 19-04-2016 17:25

Re: Crooks?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by baldy (Post 1166580)
Rommy alongside Seamus for me, You know you'll get a shift out of him and prefer Windass on the attack!

Anthony Barry isn't a bad player, Just depends how match fit he is!


Would be a massive surprise to see him picked for me.

smudgie 28-04-2016 10:26

Re: Crooks?
 
Out for the season and has kicked his last ball for stanley.......

Taken from Dan Jewell on Twitter.

cashman 28-04-2016 10:29

Re: Crooks?
 
Shame for the lad, his replacements aint let the side down though.


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:38.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com