Re: Well, here it is . . . . . .
 

I’m sure everyone grasps that more a case of amazement that after arguably the greatest feat of footballl management in the UK he gets stick AFTER the event for picking the side that won the title.

Re: Well, here it is . . . . . .
 

Sorry meant to post this much earlier

No idea, but haven't checked if Crewe's team ticked boxes.

Following issues last year; new rules voted in last year by EFL.

From late March ALL teams must have on every team sheet 10 outfield players who were on previous games team sheet.
Ie no playing the U18's and no mass changes to assist the opposition.

Ie : IF Cov's manager didn't like Barnet; he could play the Youth Team v Morecambe; sure there are other better examples.

Coley could have made a few changes; but not the numbers that some people were asking for.

Surprised EFL haven't got this out into the public domain more.

Re: Well, here it is . . . . . .
 

The EFL have much more important things to worry about - like who buys the burgers;)

Re: Well, here it is . . . . . .
 

Presumably that includes the subs used or otherwise? In theory he could have made 8 changes?

Re: Well, here it is . . . . . .
 

think it should be more to do with the game that was taking place. if there is nothing on the result of the game and it did not effect promotion or relegation than it would not really matter what side is put out by any side.

Re: Well, here it is . . . . . .
 

Just clocked the comment a page back about Accyweb giving Coley stick. I see it on twitter every now and again.

It seems a bit weird to have a go at a forum in this way. A public forum is, by nature, an ever changing collection of views and people, each laying out their opinions and rationale. I'm not sure how you can actually dislike that. I suppose people might pick out the bits they dislike (eg, "I think coley blundered by picking Smithers-Jones at right back today") and assume everyone hates Coleman?

I feel the same way about "What's wrong with Accrington, why don't they support the club more?" How can you get angry at a community of 35,000 diverse people?

I know the demographic on twitter tends to be younger and more upbeat and it's bloody marvellous for it, but I don't see what the problem with a place where it's a bit more critical from time to time.

Interesting.

Re: Well, here it is . . . . . .
 

Myself i regard it as just being "Thick" i see no problem at all with someone disagreeing, they are entitled too, its their opinion, but that dont suit some, if it aint their view, then they sulk like kids.

Re: Well, here it is . . . . . .
 

Yes includes outfield subs, but not keepers, so I think 6 changes??