Accrington Web - The Crewe match thread, or the 'Annoy Accy Mad' thread.

Page 9 of 14

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

Accrington Web (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/index.php)

- Accrington Stanley (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f93/)

- - The Crewe match thread, or the 'Annoy Accy Mad' thread. (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f93/the-crewe-match-thread-or-the-annoy-accy-mad-thread-70819.html)

choirboy

11-11-2019 19:36

Re: The Crewe match thread, or the 'Annoy Accy Mad' thread.

One other point;
Hughes will get a ban!:behead:

choirboy

11-11-2019 19:39

Re: The Crewe match thread, or the 'Annoy Accy Mad' thread.

Quote:

Originally Posted by cashman (Post 1233581)

well thats speaks volumes for people that crack on they know it all, but know nowt. i know very little dont pretend i do, but i also looked and could NOT find a rule that covered this abomination, also i cannot understand why our club did not seem to have checked this out, they had enough time to do so.

Fully agree Cashy....That is why I started my response with your quote.:s_love:

StanleyJosh

11-11-2019 19:50

Re: The Crewe match thread, or the 'Annoy Accy Mad' thread.

Choirboy, 4 announcements were made over the tannoy system from 16.10 (5 mins after 2nd half due to start) until 16:55 when it was announced fame would resume at 17:10

StanleyJosh

11-11-2019 19:54

Re: The Crewe match thread, or the 'Annoy Accy Mad' thread.

Quote:

Originally Posted by cashman (Post 1233581)

Cashy, the handbook isn’t publicised. It’s sent to competing clubs before the season starts.
The FA who run the competition were contacted and the decision was made.
I agree it was the wrong decision, but if we won... I wouldn’t care less.
We lost, and even with 2 lino’s we still would have lost

choirboy

11-11-2019 20:07

Re: The Crewe match thread, or the 'Annoy Accy Mad' thread.

Quote:

Originally Posted by StanleyJosh (Post 1233584)

Choirboy, 4 announcements were made over the tannoy system from 16.10 (5 mins after 2nd half due to start) until 16:55 when it was announced fame would resume at 17:10

I accept about the times being announced StanleyJosh but I still feel that I was not kept well enough informed regarding the replacement refereeing situation.:mad:

cashman

11-11-2019 20:14

Re: The Crewe match thread, or the 'Annoy Accy Mad' thread.

the point is not we would still have lost, we were utter garbage on sat, that to me was due to the way stanley were set up to play.

StanleyJosh

11-11-2019 20:15

Re: The Crewe match thread, or the 'Annoy Accy Mad' thread.

Quote:

Originally Posted by choirboy (Post 1233586)

I accept about the times being announced StanleyJosh but I still feel that I was not kept well enough informed regarding the replacement refereeing situation.:mad:

Every 10 minutes surely enough? No other news was broadcast because we didn’t know what was happening. It was down to the officials and managers, not a PA.
Soon as PA knew, everyone knew.

choirboy

11-11-2019 20:16

Re: The Crewe match thread, or the 'Annoy Accy Mad' thread.

Quote:

Originally Posted by StanleyJosh (Post 1233585)

StanleyJosh. You appear to have just agreed above in your own words that the Football Association had no adequate rules to cover this situation, hence the phone call. Also you have agreed that the Football Association made the wrong decision!
I find your comment..."but if we won... I wouldn’t care less" very disappointing. IMHO had we won this would have been no less of a RIDICULOUS thing to have happened.:mad:

I have sent a transcript of my earlier post to The football Association but I doubt if I will get any response!:cool:

AccyMad

11-11-2019 20:17

Re: The Crewe match thread, or the 'Annoy Accy Mad' thread.

And look what we would have won (apart from £36,000 of course) - an away tie at Stourbridge or Eastleigh, not very enticing

cashman

11-11-2019 20:19

Re: The Crewe match thread, or the 'Annoy Accy Mad' thread.

a good draw makes no difference at all to the stupid way the problem was resolved.

StanleyJosh

11-11-2019 20:22

Re: The Crewe match thread, or the 'Annoy Accy Mad' thread.

Quote:

Originally Posted by choirboy (Post 1233589)

Would it have been less ridiculous. No.
Would I have been as bothered. No.
Winning is the most important end goal.

In my opinion, a decision was made by the relevant people, I don’t agree with it but have to accept it. Having 1 linesman or 2 - we were still awful and would not have won regardless.

cashman

11-11-2019 20:27

Re: The Crewe match thread, or the 'Annoy Accy Mad' thread.

so somethings that so blatantly wrong you accept? well sorry i was brought up better than that.

StanleyJosh

11-11-2019 20:27

Re: The Crewe match thread, or the 'Annoy Accy Mad' thread.

Just a thought....

Possibility that game was agreed to continue to save managers having to agree on a replacement if couldn’t find a suitable one.
If we were 1-0 playing like Crewe were, you’d bet your house Coley would want to continue playing by any means

StanleyJosh

11-11-2019 20:28

Re: The Crewe match thread, or the 'Annoy Accy Mad' thread.

Quote:

Originally Posted by cashman (Post 1233593)

so somethings that so blatantly wrong you accept? well sorry i was brought up better than that.

What can you do about it now.
What other options were there?
Should the game have been called off?

cashman

11-11-2019 20:29

Re: The Crewe match thread, or the 'Annoy Accy Mad' thread.

Quote:

Originally Posted by StanleyJosh (Post 1233594)

thats all that is a possibility. if we had been winning it still should not have continued in that manner. it just demonstrates to me me how USELESS the F.A. are.also anyone at our club who agreed to continue in that manner. by the way i heard nothing at all about us being sanctioned.

All times are GMT. The time now is 13:50.

Page 9 of 14

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page