|
Re: Lincoln papa John's thread
Quote:
|
Re: Lincoln papa John's thread
Quote:
|
Re: Lincoln papa John's thread
yer first name yeh unsure about sama, the one yeh keep on about i think is poor.
|
Re: Lincoln papa John's thread
Quote:
Savin 6 Perritt 4 Mohammed.3 Hughes 5 Sama 3 Maguire 3 Uwakawe 5 Barclay 5 Roberts 4 Cassidy 5 Fenlon 6 Subs:- Charles 4, Pritchard 4, Bishop 4, Bolton 4, Butcher 5, |
Re: Lincoln papa John's thread
Quote:
Haha joking... presume you mean Zehn? |
Re: Lincoln papa John's thread
conneely is playing much better these days, something like when he first came here,yep i do mean the other guy think hes not a league standard player by any means.
|
Re: Lincoln papa John's thread
[QUOTE=andyd; The academy is still relatively new and Savin, Sykes are 2 examples of how well we do but football is about opinions and not everyone sees the games the same.[/QUOTE]
finding 2 players in a short time to become regular starter for the first team from the youth system is something many sides just dream of. looks good for the future as prospective players know they,d get a chance at stanley if they do their jobs. |
Re: Lincoln papa John's thread
Quote:
If we were to reach the promised land then big decisions need to be made financially. Run with what we've got and deal with the consequences or invest and give it a go. Anyway back to reality and where we are. Eagerly awaiting transfer window developments and where we try and strengthen. |
Re: Lincoln papa John's thread
[QUOTE=andyd;1249088] , players like Ogle 22 in March Mohammed 20 should not there fault have appearances under their belts now, Harry Pickering has an example at Crewe at 21 has well over 120 appearances hence Blackburn interest. Stanley have a low budget and our squad has performed miracles but some of our youngest members are probably on very low wages.
can look at this two ways. with the possibility of low wages being played is it a good thing for future signings to see that players like this are not disguarded by the club at the first opportunity given. then on the other hand are they really up to it and are taking places of others to get their chances. |
Re: Lincoln papa John's thread
Quote:
|
Re: Lincoln papa John's thread
That's the unsolvable problem of what you do with a team that's good enough to get you promotion, but which you suspect is not good enough to survive. Give them the chance to play at the higher level and see what they're made of, or cold-heartedly dump them and start again?
Rather similar to the cry of "he's taken the club as far as he can" which tends to arise whenever a certain manager climbs up yet another level :rolleyes:. I still remember being called up for a rare first team appearance for my hockey club towards the end of one season when they had a chance of promotion. The captain's pre-match team talk basically said we needed to get promotion so the club could recruit better players. He didn't actually say "so I don't need to pick you lot any more", but you could hear him thinking it ...... :D |
Re: Lincoln papa John's thread
looking back on the game think young fenlon will make a good un in a couple of years,
|
Re: Lincoln papa John's thread
[QUOTE=Chimer;1249112]That's the unsolvable problem of what you do with a team that's good enough to get you promotion, but which you suspect is not good enough to survive. Give them the chance to play at the higher level and see what they're made of, or cold-heartedly dump them and start again?
if they never get the chance then no one knows if any player can perform at a higher level. there are players you think would but sometimes its the others who are more succesful. thats whats wrong with the window system where managers cannot keep everyone to give em a chance in newly promoted sides but have to get the majority of a new squad up and running pre season. |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 11:28. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com