![]() |
Re: Fleetwood away thread.
Quote:
However,reading other posts I do not seem to be alone in thinking that Stanley's current midfielders are not the best, or performing to a degree where there is the Zest and thrust emanating from that area of play which ensures our pair of strikers time and opportunity to score the goals which will win games. I'm certain that the Manager knows this also and some of his work in progress will be devoted to improving these deficiencies. As to our striking duo,and I'm probably wrong in thinking this. It is apparent more often as the season progresses, that they are both in need of a period of R and R ... I think others have noticed this using the terms 'jaded' and 'tired. However, in the absence of replacements to form a rotation of forward players then I guess that they will have to soldier on regardless and score when and wherever the odd chance comes their way !. It goes without saying that I take some satisfaction from our current league position and maintain the pride I have always held for the team which I have followed and supported for so long. So if I do have a gripe now and again, it does I hope never appear to be sarcastic in any way !..KEEP THE FAITH ! ON STANLEY... ON TO GREATER THINGS !!. |
Re: Fleetwood away thread.
Quote:
|
Re: Fleetwood away thread.
A general comment, but I prefer it when Tariq plays some part in the games as he tends to keep wide and puts crosses into the box for Dion, Colby and whoever else makes a forward run......
|
Re: Fleetwood away thread.
Coley,s post match interview spot on did we deserve 3 points no probably not started well but then opened up and give them space, Stanley need to find their mojo back the spark from earlier in the season has gone. Thinks there was nothing wrong with the disallowed Smyth goal and although the ref got little wrong I agree watching again with Coley the goal should have stood fine margins.
|
Re: Fleetwood away thread.
[QUOTE=Twenty Eight;
What’s negative about what I’ve put ? I think the word you’re seeking is realistic. for some unknown reason being realistic is classed as negative for some unknown reason. think fans like those at all clubs do tend to get above themselves when players and the side are doing well. think the majority would have jumped for say 12th place in the league at this stage back in august. would anyone have really moaned about an away draw against fleetwood if it had been the first game of the season. not the best game yesterday but have seen far worse and was happy getting something out of it. |
Re: Fleetwood away thread.
We wuz robbed! This is from Dan on Twitter:
Great fun to do a full commentary on a really exciting game at Higbury for nobody at all to hear. Cheers iFollow! |
Re: Fleetwood away thread.
dan must think like me IFOLLOW is pretty rubbish
|
Re: Fleetwood away thread.
Quote:
|
Re: Fleetwood away thread.
Quote:
If you start following this trollop and give it credence ......... NEARLY as bad as some of the MOM selections I witnessed in the good old days when fans were there. |
Re: Fleetwood away thread.
Quote:
|
Re: Fleetwood away thread.
Quote:
|
Re: Fleetwood away thread.
Quote:
|
Re: Fleetwood away thread.
Quote:
Should a keeper who saves a pen to earn a draw, be higher rated than a keeper keeping a clean sheet? |
Re: Fleetwood away thread.
A centre-forward who scored a hat-trick, but also missed an open goal, would still probably get M-o-M. So why wouldn't a keeper who made three game-saving saves, including a penalty, but also let in a soft one, be considered?
Answers on a postcard to the Goalkeepers' Union ...... |
Re: Fleetwood away thread.
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 19:41. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com