Accrington Web

Accrington Web (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/index.php)
-   Accrington Stanley (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f93/)
-   -   Peterborough (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f93/peterborough-73387.html)

Greger 18-04-2023 19:17

Peterborough
 
Not looking good!
Posh obviously a better side, but our defending not impressive. Just play the ball forward and our three backs will lose the foot race.

Greger 18-04-2023 19:31

Re: Peterborough
 
Getting worse. Rodgers losing track of his man again.

VALAIRIAN 18-04-2023 19:39

Re: Peterborough
 
Watching on iFollow and both goals looked offside to me..... :(


:)

Greger 18-04-2023 19:39

Re: Peterborough
 
We have been poor going forward, but not terrible imo. But the defending? Ouch!

Greger 18-04-2023 19:42

Re: Peterborough
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by VALAIRIAN (Post 1272101)
Watching on iFollow and both goals looked offside to me..... :(


:)

Thought so too, the second at least. Couldn’t be certain, though. But the defending was still awful. Of that I AM certain.

Lord Stiffupperlip 18-04-2023 19:45

Re: Peterborough
 
We are on the verge of relegation & playing at home with 1 striker up front.
We're now 0-2 down. For God's sake JC do something!
Drop Pressley & get Nolan & Lowe on.
The annoying thing is Cambridge are losing. If we could win this game we'd be out of the bottom four.
Waiting to see if anything will change

Lord Stiffupperlip 18-04-2023 20:14

Re: Peterborough
 
OMG! He must be reading this.

Kiwi John 19-04-2023 07:49

Re: Peterborough
 
Just watched the highlights (if you can really call them that when we loose))...First goal marginal and in real time I can understand the flag staying down, but the second was clearly offside, didn't need a frame by frame..I await Cashys summation of the officiating .

choirboy 19-04-2023 08:09

Re: Peterborough
 
The Posh showed why they are challenging for promotion with their slick passing and clever interplay. Stanley got back into the match after the substitutions in the second half and through the hard work by the likes of Hamilton, Clarke, Quirk, Longelo, Leigh and the fresh legs of Lowe and Nolan. Our team has constantly had gaps and shortcomings and has been subject to too many changes all season mainly caused by injuries and suspensions.
Even from the Clayton End I thought that the second goal would have been cancelled for offside. I looked straight away to the linesman but obviously I was not in the best place to judge it. At half time Valairian texted me to say both goals were offside as he was watching on I follow.
The Clayton End maintained their superb support and helped to lift the players in that good spell when we scored.
It is clearly very difficult to see us surviving but please let us maintain our full support for the boys in red!
KEEP THE FAITH:jimbo:
ON STANLEY ON
:theband::jimbo:

choirboy 19-04-2023 08:18

Re: Peterborough
 

KEEP THE FAITH:jimbo:
ON STANLEY ON
:theband::jimbo:

choirboy 19-04-2023 08:29

Re: Peterborough
 
1 Attachment(s)
Just watched the highlights and agree with Kiwijohn that the first goal was marginal but the second was clearly offside. I froze the play at 58 seconds, IMHO clearly offside! More poor work from the match officials!

Lord Stiffupperlip 19-04-2023 09:08

Re: Peterborough
 
The 11 players who ended the match should have been on from the start.
Notice most of the assists/efforts came from Longelo.
He was also the most fouled player - says everything!

Watchdog 19-04-2023 09:27

Re: Peterborough
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Lord Stiffupperlip (Post 1272112)
The 11 players who ended the match should have been on from the start.
Notice most of the assists/efforts came from Longelo.
He was also the most fouled player - says everything!

Spot on LS. Nolan should have been given an extended run in the team long since.
We are always lastminute.com making substitutes. The two substitutes should have been given a chance from half time when it was obvious things were not going to plan.

Exile on Spencer St 19-04-2023 10:06

Re: Peterborough
 
Stanley put up another battling second half counter-offensive but found it impossible to beat their fitter, faster, and better coached opponents, with the help of another weak referee and linesmen.
Couldn’t see any of the goals from the Clayton End but both Posh goals looked offside to me. The second was so offside their scorer was in a different post code.

Then I noticed this opening statement on Wikipedia about the company that runs the refereeing business …
“Professional Game Match Officials Limited (PGMOL) is the body responsible for fixing games in English professional football.”

That explains a lot.:rolleyes:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Profes...ed#Sponsorship

VALAIRIAN 19-04-2023 10:45

Re: Peterborough
 
Brilliant find Exile :)

How can such a 'Professional Body' not realise such a howler....????


:)

Twenty Eight 19-04-2023 12:09

Re: Peterborough
 
As bad as the decision was for the second one (I've no issues with the first one, very tight) again this is just papering over cracks and evading the issue(s) that matter.
I'm really bored and have been for a few months now with all this nobody likes us rhetoric, deliberately picking on us, not getting the rub of the green blah blah blah.
Let's just be honest for once.
The squad is not a League One squad. Indeed it will need a major overhaul not only if we survive but should we drop down.
It's been coming for a while now.

Crown Grounder 19-04-2023 12:15

Re: Peterborough
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Twenty Eight (Post 1272118)
As bad as the decision was for the second one (I've no issues with the first one, very tight) again this is just papering over cracks and evading the issue(s) that matter.
I'm really bored and have been for a few months now with all this nobody likes us rhetoric, deliberately picking on us, not getting the rub of the green blah blah blah.
Let's just be honest for once.
The squad is not a League One squad. Indeed it will need a major overhaul not only if we survive but should we drop down.
It's been coming for a while now.

Glad you've posted my clear thinking friend. Of course, you know Coley can't speak some of the truth until its confirmed we are......down...down....down.......otherwise the players would not try at all.......although I do sometimes wonder if that would actually make any difference.

choirboy 19-04-2023 12:17

Re: Peterborough
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by VALAIRIAN (Post 1272116)
Brilliant find Exile :)

How can such a 'Professional Body' not realise such a howler....????


:)

They are definitely ‘Offside’ with that one Val and Exile!:dummy2:

MikeA 19-04-2023 18:54

Re: Peterborough
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by VALAIRIAN (Post 1272116)
Brilliant find Exile :)

How can such a 'Professional Body' not realise such a howler....????


:)

It's Wikipedia. Somebody's probably changed it as a joke! :)

Exile on Spencer St 19-04-2023 19:22

Re: Peterborough
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MikeA (Post 1272121)
It's Wikipedia. Somebody's probably changed it as a joke! :)

I’m certain they have, MikeA, but a joke must have a kernel of truth to be funny.;)


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:08.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com