Mullers Gone To Bantams - Page 11

cashman · 21-03-2009, 10:48

Quote:

Originally Posted by Willie Miller

20th march 2009, the day loyalty died!

Quote:

Originally Posted by cashman

grow up.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Willie Miller

Yeah oh wise one, sorry about that.

PS Its prob more childish to respond to my point of view with just........."grow up"

there you are willie highlighted the one you asked for, which was in response to your silly quote n then ya have the arrogance to call mine childish,

you really are a silly child.

ukcowboy · 21-03-2009, 10:50

Quote:

Originally Posted by Willie Miller

20th march 2009, the day loyalty died!

Quote:

Originally Posted by ukcowboy

On whos part?

Quote:

Originally Posted by cashman

grow up.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Willie Miller

Those quotes just highlight my point

Try highlighting the one when my opinion was quashed with a "grow up"

As requested Jase, along with my reply to your original quote.............IMHO you sounded like a 5yr old who couldnt get His own way...........Hence the rather curt replies from both myself and Cashy.

edit:- Posted at same time as Cashy's reply

Haggis316 · 21-03-2009, 11:06

I am always interested in Jase's contributions to this Forum and I for one hope he keeps posting.

cashman · 21-03-2009, 11:10

Quote:

Originally Posted by Haggis316

I am always interested in Jase's contributions to this Forum and I for one hope he keeps posting.

why on earth shouldn't he Haggis? people disagree with me, but me toys stay in the pram.

Willie Miller · 21-03-2009, 11:10

Yeah, I questioned Mullins loyalty and was told to grow up.......

Couldn't give a toss how I come across TBH

Stanleymad · 21-03-2009, 11:12

Posted via Mobile Device I think its more to the clubs benefit than paul's imho if paul was banging them in week in week out then i dont think the club would of let him go to easily. The club seem to be struggling to stay in the black & the season tickets arn't going to plan. The club ignore fans & was a Rubbish announcement.

AccyMad · 21-03-2009, 11:14

Quote:

Originally Posted by Willie Miller

I think Mullins opinion on the deal should have been secondary......

Who will be at fault if we get relegated.......

I still think Paul's opinion on this move WAS secondary, no-one will convince me otherwise than that the financial part of it was the real reason behind it. If only the club would admit it, I would have more respect for them right now.

Stanleymad · 21-03-2009, 11:16

Quote:

Originally Posted by Willie Miller

Yeah, I questioned Mullins loyalty and was told to grow up.......

Couldn't give a toss how I come across TBH

Posted via Mobile Device thing is unfortunately there's no such thing as loyalty anymore be it club or player, the only people that do have more loyalty is the fans! Think thats the upsetting part.

Willie Miller · 21-03-2009, 11:17

Exactly Diane, then fans like me would n't be questioning his loyalty to the red shirt!

Relegation haunts his parent club, yet he says "I fancy a day out at Wembley......"

No, but its what we have been told so

cashman · 21-03-2009, 11:24

Quote:

Originally Posted by Willie Miller

Exactly Diane, then fans like me would n't be questioning his loyalty to the red shirt!

Relegation haunts his parent club, yet he says "I fancy a day out at Wembley......"

No, but its what we have been told so

that aint what the bradford manager says, re haggis link, the way i see it, hes lost his pace, aint been very prolific this time, aint laid that many on either, gives 110% great servant, no question about that, so i weigh all that up n its a good deal to me.

Willie Miller · 21-03-2009, 11:29

He was the one who got in front of his man & released Miles in the run up to the opener against Macc. He is also a legend.

Some things you cannot get your head around, this is one....

Its financial & I just wish the club would say so, then Mullin could be put back on the pedestal marked "loyal footballer"

Willie Miller · 21-03-2009, 11:30

Quote:

Originally Posted by cashman

hes lost his pace

He never had any! Even in the Unibond!

But he gets fitter every season IMHO

cashman · 21-03-2009, 11:36

Quote:

Originally Posted by Willie Miller

He never had any! Even in the Unibond!

But he gets fitter every season IMHO

agree he was never the quickest, but fer me was sure quicker a couple of yrs ago. Stanley need money thats beyond doubt, punching above their weight but are potless, the loyalty to see the club get by in the light of their financial state over rides any other loyalty to me.

mab · 21-03-2009, 11:48

When i first heard the news,which wasn't until late afternoon,it was one of disbelive and of sadness and anger that a player of pauls status and being the clubs only main striker would be loaned out at this stage of the season. Having had time to think things over and read through all the posts and those off the bradford forum. paul will be mist can't get away from that but a new challange waits him self and for stanley,i wish him well over at bradford,andhope we don't have a mullin hangover today and that everyone gets behind the lads on the pitch and behind the club

cashman · 21-03-2009, 11:55

Quote:

Originally Posted by mab

When i first heard the news,which wasn't until late afternoon,it was one of disbelive and of sadness and anger that a player of pauls status and being the clubs only main striker would be loaned out at this stage of the season. Having had time to think things over and read through all the posts and those off the bradford forum. paul will be mist can't get away from that but a new challange waits him self and for stanley,i wish him well over at bradford,andhope we don't have a mullin hangover today and that everyone gets behind the lads on the pitch and behind the club

thats the way it should be mab, hope yer right n the sulkers get behind whoever replaces him.